Method for simulating prosthetic implant selection and placement

• US 20070066917A1
• Filed: 09/20/2005
• Published: 03/22/2007
• Est. Priority Date: 09/20/2005
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Zimmer Technology Incorporated (Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc.)
• Original Assignee: Zimmer Technology Incorporated (Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc.)
• Inventors: Hodorek, Robert, Grimm, James
• Application Number:
  US11/231,156
• Publication Number:
  US 20070066917A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 600/595
• CPC Class Codes: A61B 2034/105 Modelling of the patient, e.g. for ligaments or bones
• CPC Class Codes: A61B 2034/108 Computer aided selection or customisation of medical implants or cutting guides
• CPC Class Codes: A61B 2034/2055 Optical tracking systems
• CPC Class Codes: A61B 34/10 Computer-aided planning, simulation or modelling of surgical operations
• CPC Class Codes: A61B 34/20 Surgical navigation systems; Devices for tracking or guiding surgical instruments, e.g. for frameless stereotaxis
• CPC Class Codes: A61B 90/36 Image-producing devices or illumination devices not otherwise provided for

Abstract

A method and apparatus are provided for preoperatively or intraoperatively determining prosthetic implant selection and placement to achieve acceptable alignment and spacing of anatomical structures affected by the prosthetic implant and to achieve acceptable soft tissue balance proximate the prosthetic implant without requiring trial-and-error selection of implant size and placement during surgery. In one exemplary embodiment, the method and apparatus of the present invention are used to choose appropriate tibial, meniscal and femoral prosthetic components to achieve acceptable alignment, acceptable spacing of the tibia and femur, and acceptable soft tissue balance over a full range of motion of the knee.

Claims

1. A method for simulating prosthetic implant selection and placement in an anatomical structure using a computer-assisted surgery system, comprising the steps of:

generating a virtual model of the anatomical structure;

registering the anatomical structure with the virtual model of the anatomical structure in the computer-assisted surgery system;

determining a mechanical axis correction of the anatomical structure;

inputting the mechanical axis correction into the computer-assisted surgery system;

determining soft tissue balance in the anatomical structure;

inputting the soft tissue balance into the computer-assisted surgery system;

selecting a simulated implant component corresponding to the mechanical axis correction and the soft tissue balance;

simulating implantation of the simulated implant component;

verifying that the simulated implant component provides the mechanical axis correction and the soft tissue balance; and

selecting an actual implant component corresponding to the simulated implant component if the simulated implant component provides the mechanical axis correction and the soft tissue balance.

2. The method of claim 1, further comprising the additional step of implanting the selected actual implant component in the anatomical structure.

3. The method of claim 2, further comprising the additional step of performing soft tissue releases subsequent to or prior to said implanting step.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein said step of determining a mechanical axis correction comprises manipulating the anatomical structure to form a correct mechanical axis.

5. The method of claim 4, wherein said step of manipulating the anatomical structure comprises moving the anatomical structure through a range of motion and periodically recording a position of the anatomical structure in the computer-assisted surgery system while forming the correct mechanical axis.

6. The method of claim 1, wherein said step of determining soft tissue balance comprises tensioning the anatomical structure to a desired tension.

7. The method of claim 6, wherein said step of tensioning the anatomical structure to a desired tension comprises moving the anatomical structure through a range of motion and periodically recording the desired tension in the computer-assisted surgery system.

8. The method of claim 1, wherein said step of verifying comprises moving the anatomical structure through a range of motion and periodically verifying the simulated implant component provides the mechanical axis correction and the soft tissue balance.

9. A method for simulating prosthetic implant selection and placement in a knee joint using a computer-assisted surgery system, the knee joint including a femur and a tibia, comprising the steps of:

generating a virtual model of the knee joint;

registering the knee joint with the virtual model of the knee joint in the computer-assisted surgery system;

determining a mechanical axis correction of the knee joint;

inputting the mechanical axis correction into the computer-assisted surgery system;

determining soft tissue balance in the knee joint;

inputting the soft tissue balance into the computer-assisted surgery system;

selecting a simulated implant component corresponding to the mechanical axis correction and the soft tissue balance;

simulating implantation of the simulated implant component;

verifying that the simulated implant component provides the mechanical axis correction and the soft tissue balance; and

selecting an actual implant component corresponding to the simulated implant component if the simulated implant component provides the mechanical axis correction and the soft tissue balance.

10. The method of claim 9, further comprising the additional step of implanting the selected actual implant component in the knee joint.

11. The method of claim 10, further comprising the additional step of performing soft tissue releases subsequent to or prior to said implanting step.

12. The method of claim 9, wherein the selected actual implant component comprises one of a distal femoral implant component, a meniscal implant component, and a proximal tibial implant component.

13. The method of claim 9, wherein said step of determining a mechanical axis correction comprises manipulating the knee joint to form a correct mechanical axis.

14. The method of claim 13, wherein said step of manipulating the knee joint comprises moving the knee joint through a range of motion and periodically recording positions of the femur and the tibia in the computer-assisted surgery system while forming the correct mechanical axis.

15. The method of claim 9, wherein said step of determining soft tissue balance comprises tensioning the knee joint to a desired tension.

16. The method of claim 15, wherein said step of tensioning the knee joint comprises moving the knee joint through a range of motion and periodically recording in the computer-assisted surgery system the desired tension between the femur and the tibia.

17. The method of claim 9, wherein said step of verifying comprises simulating movement of the knee joint through a range of motion and periodically verifying the simulated implant component provides the mechanical axis correction and the soft tissue balance.

18. The method of claim 9, further comprising, prior to said simulating step, the additional steps of:

selecting a simulated implant component cut plane corresponding to the mechanical axis correction and the soft tissue balance; and

simulating cutting of the knee joint along the simulated implant component cut plane.

19. The method of claim 18, subsequent to said step of selecting a simulated implant component cut plane, further comprising the additional step of selecting an actual implant component cut plane corresponding to the simulated implant component cut plane if the simulated implant component cut plane provides the mechanical axis correction and the soft tissue balance.

20. The method of claim 19, further comprising the additional step of physically cutting the selected actual implant component cut plane in the knee joint.