Aggregation of asset use indices within a process plant

• US 20070067142A1
• Filed: 09/20/2005
• Published: 03/22/2007
• Est. Priority Date: 09/20/2005
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Fisher-Rosemount Systems Incorporated (Emerson Electric Company)
• Original Assignee: Fisher-Rosemount Systems Incorporated (Emerson Electric Company)
• Inventors: Kavaklioglu, Kadir, Dillon, Steven, Westbrock, Jon, Rome, Gregory
• Granted Patent: US 7,272,531 B2
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 702/182
• CPC Class Codes: G05B 2219/32286 Monitoring items connected to certain different entities, activities
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 11/008 Reliability or availability analysis
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 3/0482 Interaction with lists of selectable items, e.g. menus

Abstract

A method of monitoring an entity within a process plant wherein the entity includes a plurality of lower level entities, includes acquiring a plurality of use indices, acquiring a plurality of weighting values, and creating an aggregate use index from a combination of the lower level use indices and weighting values, wherein the aggregate use index represents status information regarding the entity. Each use index pertains to status information regarding one of the plurality of lower level entities, and each weighting value pertains to the importance of a lower level entity among the plurality of lower level entities.

Claims

1. A method of monitoring an entity within a process plant wherein the entity includes a plurality of lower level entities, the method comprising:

acquiring a plurality of use indices, each use index pertaining to status information regarding one of the plurality of lower level entities;

acquiring a plurality of weighting values, each weighting value pertaining to the importance of a lower level entity among the plurality of lower level entities; and

creating an aggregate use index from a combination of the lower level use indices and weighting values, wherein the aggregate use index represents status information regarding the entity.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein each use index comprises a use index created from data pertaining to the operation of the lower level entity.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein the weighting value is based on the impact of the lower level entity on the entity and the frequency of failure of the lower level entity.

4. The method of claim 3, wherein the weighting value comprises the product of the impact of the lower level entity on the entity and the frequency of failure of the lower level entity.

5. The method of claim 3, wherein at least one of the impact of the lower level entity on the entity and the frequency of failure of the lower level entity is based on maintenance data pertaining to the lower level entity.

6. The method of claim 3, wherein at least one of the impact of the lower level entity on the entity and the frequency of failure of the lower level entity is based on process data pertaining to the lower level entity.

7. The method of claim 3, wherein at least one of the impact of the lower level entity on the entity and the frequency of failure of the lower level entity is based on diagnostic data pertaining to the lower level entity.

8. The method of claim 3, wherein at least one of the impact of the lower level entity on the entity and the frequency of failure of the lower level entity is based on on-line monitoring data pertaining to the lower level entity.

9. The method of claim 3, wherein at least one of the impact of the lower level entity on the entity and the frequency of failure of the lower level entity is based on heuristic data pertaining to the lower level entity.

10. The method of claim 1, wherein the weighting value pertains to the criticality of the lower level entity to the entity.

11. The method of claim 1, wherein a range of values for the weighting value is the same among each of the plurality of lower level entities.

12. The method of claim 1, wherein the range of values for the use indices for each of the plurality of lower level entities is the same among each of the plurality of lower level entities.

13. The method of claim 1, wherein the aggregate use index is an aggregate health index indicating the health of the entity.

14. The method of claim 1, wherein the aggregate use index is an aggregate performance index indicating the relative performance of the entity.

15. The method of claim 1, wherein the aggregate use index is an aggregate variability index indicating an amount of deviation of a parameter of the entity.

16. The method of claim 1, wherein the aggregate use index is an aggregate utilization index indicating a degree of exploitation of the entity.

17. The method of claim 1, wherein creating an aggregate use index comprises creating a weighted average of the use indices of the lower level entities.

18. The method of claim 1, wherein creating an aggregate use index comprises:

combining the weighting value of a lower level entity with the use index of the lower level entity to produce a combined value for each of the plurality of entities; and

summing the combined values for each of the plurality of lower level entities to produce a summed value;

dividing the summed value by the sum of the plurality of weighting values.

19. The method of claim 1, wherein creating the aggregate use index comprises computing the aggregate use index as:

$u=\frac{\underset{i=1}{\overset{n}{\sum <br><br>}}<br><br>w_i<br><br>u_i}{\underset{i=1}{\overset{n}{\sum <br><br>}}<br><br>w_i}$

wherein;

u=the aggregate use index of the higher level entity

n=the number of lower level entities within the plurality of entities

u_i=the use index of the i^th lower level entity

w_i=the weighting value of the i^th lower level entity

20. A method of monitoring an entity within a process plant, wherein the process plant comprises a system hierarchy having a plurality of levels and a plurality of devices, the method comprising:

acquiring a plurality of use indices, each use index pertaining to the status of a device;

assigning a weighting value to each device, the weighting value pertaining to the priority of the device among the plurality of devices;

combining the use index and weighting values assigned to each of the devices; and

creating an aggregate use index at each level of the system hierarchy from the combined use indices and weighting values.

21. The method of claim 20, wherein acquiring a use index pertaining to the status of each device comprises periodically acquiring a use index from each device.

22. The method of claim 20, wherein each use index comprises a use index created from data pertaining to the operation of the device.

23. The method of claim 20, further comprising creating a use index for each device based upon data pertaining to the operation of each of the plurality of entities while each entity is in operation.

24. The method of claim 20, wherein the weighting value is based on the impact of the device among the plurality of devices and the frequency of failure of the device.

25. The method of claim 20, wherein the aggregate use index comprises a weighted average of the plurality of use indices.

26. The method of claim 20, wherein creating an aggregate use index at each level of the system hierarchy from the combined use indices and weighting values comprises utilizing a weighted sum of the use indices and the weighting values.

27. The method of claim 20, wherein creating an aggregate use index at each level of the system hierarchy from the combined use indices and weighting values comprises utilizing a weighted average of the lower level use indices.

28. The method of claim 20, wherein the use index is a performance index indicating the relative performance of the device.

29. The method of claim 20, wherein the use index is a variability index indicating an amount of deviation of a parameter of the device.

30. The method of claim 20, wherein the use index is a utilization index indicating a degree of exploitation of the device.

31. The method of claim 20, wherein the use index is a health index indicating the health of the device.

32. The method of claim 20, further comprising displaying the aggregate use index for at least one level of hierarchy of the system hierarchy.

33. A system for displaying an aggregate use indices for a process plant having a plurality of entities, the system comprising:

a processor;

a display;

a database adapted to store use indices for each of the plurality of entities, each use index pertaining to the status of the entity and adapted to store weighting values for each of the plurality of entities, each weighting value pertaining to the importance of the entity among the plurality of entities;

a routine adapted to be executed by the processor which stores a representation corresponding to a higher level entity plurality of entities in the database, the higher level entity comprises the plurality of entities;

a routine adapted to be executed by the processor which generates an aggregate use index from a combination of the plurality of use indices and the plurality of weighting values, the aggregate use index pertaining to the status of the higher level entity; and

a routine adapted to be executed by the processor which displays the representation and which displays the aggregate use index proximately to the corresponding representation.

34. The system of claim 33, wherein the weighting value is based on the impact of the entity on the higher level entity and the frequency of failure of the entity.

35. The system of claim 33, wherein the aggregate use index comprises a weighted average of the product of each use index and each weighting value.

36. The system of claim 33, wherein the aggregate use index comprises a performance index indicating the relative performance of the higher level entity.

37. The system of claim 33, wherein the aggregate use index comprises a variability index indicating an amount of deviation of a parameter of the higher level entity.

38. The system of claim 33, wherein the aggregate use index comprises a utilization index indicating a degree of exploitation of the higher level entity.

39. The system of claim 33, wherein the aggregate use index comprises a health index indicating the health of the higher level entity.

40. The system of claim 33, wherein the representation of the higher level entity is a representation of the process plant.