System and method for intelligence building in an expert system

• US 20070067181A1
• Filed: 09/22/2005
• Published: 03/22/2007
• Est. Priority Date: 09/22/2005
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: International Business Machines Corporation
• Original Assignee: International Business Machines Corporation
• Inventors: Dettinger, Richard, Kolz, Daniel, Djugash, Judy
• Application Number:
  US11/232,766
• Publication Number:
  US 20070067181A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 705/2
• CPC Class Codes: G06N 5/022 Knowledge engineering; Knowledge acquisition
• CPC Class Codes: G16H 40/20 for the management or administration of healthcare resources or facilities, e.g. managing hospital staff or surgery rooms
• CPC Class Codes: G16H 50/20 for computer-aided diagnosis, e.g. based on medical expert systems
• CPC Class Codes: G16H 70/60 relating to pathologies

Abstract

A method, system and article of manufacture for intelligence building in expert systems and, more particularly, for evaluating treatment decisions overriding recommended treatments that are generated by expert systems. One embodiment provides a method of evaluating treatment decisions, comprising receiving a specification of a decided treatment for a patient having a given disease. The decided treatment differs from a recommended treatment identified by an expert system in response to analysis of symptomatic data corresponding to the patient. The patient is monitored subsequent to being treated according to the decided treatment. The decided treatment is evaluated on the basis of data captured by the monitoring. On the basis of the evaluation, feedback with respect to the decided treatment and the recommended treatment is generated.

Claims

1. A computer-implemented method of evaluating treatment decisions, comprising:

receiving a specification of a decided treatment for a patient having a given disease, the decided treatment differing from a recommended treatment identified by an expert system in response to analysis of symptomatic data corresponding to the patient;

creating an outcome test specification defining at least one check point with respect to the given disease which is suitable for evaluation of a treatment result obtained with the decided treatment;

creating, on the basis of the outcome test specification, a database watcher configured to analyze data which is subsequently provided for the patient with respect to the at least one check point to monitor progress of the given disease;

executing the database watcher to determine the treatment result on the basis of the analyzed data; and

notifying a medical institution of the determined treatment result.

2. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

comparing the decided treatment and the recommended treatment to identify all deviations of the decided treatment from the recommended treatment.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein the at least one check point identifies one of a diagnosis and a test to be performed on the patient to provide feedback to the database watcher with respect to the progress of the given disease.

4. The method of claim 1, further comprising at least one of:

(i) auditing a doctor having determined the decided treatment to identify reasons for overriding the recommended treatment; and

(ii) notifying the medical institution of the decided treatment.

5. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

creating, for the at least one check point, a trigger condition to trigger determination of the treatment result, wherein the treatment result is determined only if the trigger condition is satisfied.

6. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

associating the database watcher with a predefined execution duration.

7. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

comparing the treatment result with a result which has previously been obtained for another patient by adopting the recommended treatment; and

updating the expert system on the basis of the comparison.

8. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

persistently storing the symptomatic data, the decided treatment and the treatment result.

9. A computer-implemented method of evaluating treatment decisions, comprising:

receiving a specification of a decided treatment for a patient having a given disease, the decided treatment differing from a recommended treatment identified by an expert system in response to analysis of symptomatic data corresponding to the patient;

monitoring the patient subsequent to being treated according to the decided treatment;

evaluating the decided treatment on the basis of data captured by the monitoring; and

on the basis of the evaluation, generating feedback with respect to the decided treatment and the recommended treatment.

10. The method of claim 9, wherein monitoring the patient comprises:

creating an outcome test specification defining at least one check point with respect to the given disease which is suitable for evaluation of a treatment result obtained with the decided treatment;

creating, on the basis of the outcome test specification, a database watcher configured to analyze the captured data which is subsequently provided for the patient with respect to the at least one check point to monitor progress of the given disease; and

executing the database watcher to determine the treatment result on the basis of the analyzed data.

11. The method of claim 10, wherein the at least one check point identifies one of a diagnosis and a test to be performed on the patient to provide feedback to the database watcher with respect to the progress of the given disease.

12. The method of claim 10, further comprising:

creating, for the at least one check point, a trigger condition to trigger determination of the treatment result, wherein the treatment result is determined only if the trigger condition is satisfied.

13. The method of claim 10, further comprising:

associating the database watcher with a predefined execution duration.

14. The method of claim 9, further comprising:

comparing the decided treatment and the recommended treatment to identify all deviations of the decided treatment from the recommended treatment, wherein the feedback includes all identified deviations.

15. The method of claim 9, further comprising at least one of:

(i) auditing a doctor having determined the decided treatment to identify reasons for overriding the recommended treatment; and

(ii) notifying a medical institution of the decided treatment.

16. The method of claim 9, wherein the feedback includes a conclusion regarding a doctor'"'"'s judgment in electing the decided treatment instead of the recommended treatment.

17. The method of claim 9, further comprising:

comparing the treatment result with a result which has previously been obtained for another patient by adopting the recommended treatment, wherein the feedback includes a result of the comparison.

18. The method of claim 9, further comprising:

updating the expert system on the basis of the feedback.

19. The method of claim 9, further comprising providing the feedback to a medical institution.

20. A system, comprising:

an expert system configured to determine a recommended treatment in response to analysis of symptomatic data corresponding to a patient having a given disease; and

an intelligence unit for evaluating treatment decisions, the intelligence unit being configured to;

receive a specification of a decided treatment for the patient, the decided treatment differing from the recommended treatment;

create an outcome test specification defining at least one check point with respect to the given disease which is suitable for evaluation of a treatment result obtained with the decided treatment;

create, on the basis of the outcome test specification, a database watcher configured to analyze data which is subsequently provided for the patient with respect to the at least one check point to monitor progress of the given disease;

execute the database watcher to determine the treatment result on the basis of the analyzed data;

evaluate the decided treatment on the basis of the treatment result; and

generate, on the basis of the evaluation, feedback with respect to the decided treatment and the recommended treatment.