Method and system for network-based comparision shopping

• US 20070073592A1
• Filed: 09/28/2005
• Published: 03/29/2007
• Est. Priority Date: 09/28/2005
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Pronto, Inc. (IAC/InterActiveCorp), IT University of Copenhagen
• Original Assignee: Redcarpet Incorporated
• Inventors: Foley, John, Perry, Bradley, Marcus, Jonathan, Marriott, Daniel, Strauss, Tracey
• Application Number:
  US11/238,697
• Publication Number:
  US 20070073592A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 705/26
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 30/0601 Electronic shopping [e-shopping]
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 30/0603 Catalogue ordering

Abstract

A method and system is provided that in a fully automated manner facilitates comparison shopping retail products online. An exemplary method according to the invention is a method for automated comparative shopping. A product for sale by a first merchant that is displayed to a user on a web page is first identified and first records relating to the product are extracted from the web site, including the price of the product and the name of the first merchant. Second records from a database system are retrieved, including the price of the product and the name of the one or more second merchants selling the product, and are formatted into one or more merchant listings, each merchant listing including at least the name of the merchant and the price of the product. The merchant listings are then provided for display to the user.

Claims

1. A method for automated comparative shopping, the method comprising:

a. identifying a product for sale by a first merchant that is displayed to a user on a web page;

b. extracting first records from the web page, including the price of the product and the name of the first merchant;

c. retrieving second records from a database system, including the price of the product and the name of the one or more second merchants selling the product;

d. formatting the second records into one or more merchant listings, each merchant listing including at least the name of the merchant and the price of the product;

e. providing the merchant listings for display to the user.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the merchant listings are provided for display in a specific format.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein the merchant listings are provided for display in the form of a grid.

4. The method of claim 3, wherein the merchant listings on the grid are sorted to display the merchant with the lowest price in the best position relative to the other merchant listings.

5. The method of claim 4, wherein the lowest price is the lowest net effective price, including shipping and taxes.

6. The method of claim 4, further comprising providing the first merchant with the ability to offer the user a discount that reduces the net effective price of the product.

7. The method of claim 6, wherein the discount can be dynamically adjusted to assure that the first merchant offers the lowest net effective price.

8. The method of claim 1, further comprising providing the first merchant with the ability to place its merchant listing in the best position relative to all other merchant listings displayed to the user.

9. The method of claim 8, wherein the best position relative to all other merchant listings displayed to the user is immediately above the merchant listing with the lowest price for the product.

10. The method of claim 1, wherein the second merchants have the ability to influence the position of their merchant listing relative to the other merchant listings.

11. The method of claim 10, wherein the second merchants have the ability to influence the position of their merchant listing relative to the other merchant listings by offering the user a discount.

12. The method of claim 11, wherein the second merchants can set automated logic rules that control the amount of the discount.

13. The method of claim 12, wherein the automated logic rules that control the amount of the discount can be dynamically adjusted based on product inventory.

14. A system comprising:

a first computer having a first computer-readable medium containing first records relating to a plurality of first products available for sale by one or more first merchants; and

a second computer coupled to the first computer and having a second computer-readable medium containing a program configured to identify and extract information about a second product available for sale on a second merchant web page;

wherein second records containing the information extracted about the second product are transmitted from the second computer to the first computer for comparison with the first records to determine whether the second product matches any of the plurality of first products.

15. The system according to claim 14, wherein the second computer displays a notification when the second product matches any of the plurality of first products.

16. The system according to claim 15, wherein the notification is in the form of a toast.

17. The system according to claim 14, wherein information from the first records for any product that matches the second product is displayed to the user.

18. The system according to claim 17, wherein the information is displayed as a price comparison grid.

19. The system according to claim 18, wherein the first and second merchants can set automated logic rules that will offer promotions to users of the comparative shopping system.

20. The system according to claim 14, wherein the manufacturer of the first product can set automated logic rules that will offer promotions to users of the comparative shopping system.

21. The system according to claim 14, wherein the manufacturer of the second product can set automated logic rules that will offer promotions to users of the comparative shopping system.