METHOD OF ANALYZING OIL AND GAS PRODUCTION PROJECT

• US 20070078637A1
• Filed: 09/30/2005
• Published: 04/05/2007
• Est. Priority Date: 09/30/2005
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Siemens Energy Incorporated (Siemens AG)
• Original Assignee: Berwanger, Inc.
• Inventors: Kimble, David, Martin, Alex, Eifert, David
• Application Number:
  US11/162,994
• Publication Number:
  US 20070078637A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 703/6
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/06 Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling

Abstract

A method is disclosed for analyzing an oil and gas production project with a computer system. Using a computer program, a user inputs characteristics of systems for the project and inputs characteristics of the expected production of the project, such as production life (years) and the production rate of the project. Based on the characteristics, the program generates a plurality of projected case profiles, each of which defines characteristics of the systems for a period of the production life of the project. A controlling case is then created using information from the plurality of case profiles. In the controlling case, each of the systems is analyzed to determine in which profile the system has the greatest cost, weight, area, or other criterion. From the analysis, characteristics of the systems are generated for the project that best meet the expected production over the entire production life of the project.

Claims

1. A computer-implemented method of analyzing an oil and gas production project, comprising:

creating a model of systems and pipelines for the project;

creating a plurality of profiles from the model, each profile containing system requirements and pipeline requirements to meet a given period of production for the project;

selecting at least two of the profiles;

selecting one of the system requirements from the at least two profiles;

selecting one of the pipeline requirements from the at least two profiles; and

creating a controlling case for the project based on the selected system requirements and the selected pipeline requirements.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the systems are selected from the group consisting of:

separation systems, crude metering and export pump systems, gas compression systems, gas dehydration systems, gas sweetening systems, hydrocarbon dew point control systems, condensate disposal systems, produced water treatment systems, relief systems, water injection systems, power systems, heating and cooling medium, systems, raw water systems, fire protection systems, drilling systems, accommodations, and structural steel.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein the system requirements are selected from the group consisting of process calculations, utility balances, system equipment, system capacity, system weight, system area, system cost, substructure size, and substructure cost.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein the pipeline requirements are selected from the group consisting of diameter, cost, length, and type of pipeline.

5. The method of claim 1, wherein selecting one of the system requirements from the at least two profiles comprises selecting a weight for a given system in one of the profiles that is greater or lesser than the weight for the same system in the other profiles.

6. The method of claim 1, wherein selecting one of the system requirements from the at least two profiles comprises selecting a cost for a given system in one of the profiles that is greater or lesser than the cost for the same system in the other profiles.

7. The method of claim 1, wherein selecting one of the system requirements from the at least two profiles comprises selecting a capacity for a given system in one of the profiles that is greater or lesser than the capacity for the same system in the other profiles.

8. The method of claim 1, wherein selecting one of the system requirements from the at least two profiles comprises selecting an area for a given system in one of the profiles that is greater or lesser than the area for the same system in the other profiles.

9. The method of claim 1, wherein selecting one of the system requirements from the at least two profiles comprises:

automatically comparing the system requirements for a given system in each of the at least two profiles; and

automatically selecting one of the system requirements for the given system based on the comparison.

10. The method of claim 1, wherein selecting one of the pipeline requirements from the at least two profiles comprises selecting a diameter, a cost, a length, or a type for a given pipeline in one of the profiles that is greater or lesser than that for the same pipeline in the other profiles.

11. The method of claim 1, wherein creating the plurality of profiles from the model comprises performing process simulations using information pertaining to the systems, the pipelines, and the production to determine the system requirements and the pipeline requirements for the profiles.

12. The method of claim 1, further comprising calculating controlling requirements for the systems and the pipelines of the project using information associated with the controlling case.

13. The method of claim 12, wherein calculating controlling requirements for the systems and the pipelines of the project using information associated with the controlling case comprises recalculating structural requirements to support area and weight requirements associated with the controlling case.

14. A computer-readable device having program instructions for performing a computer-implemented method of analyzing an oil and gas production project, the method comprising:

creating a model of systems and pipelines for the project;

creating a plurality of profiles from the model, each profile containing system requirements and pipeline requirements to meet a given period of production for the project;

selecting at least two of the profiles;

selecting one of the system requirements from the at least two profiles;

selecting one of the pipeline requirements from the at least two profiles; and

creating a controlling case for the project based on the selected system requirements and the selected pipeline requirements.

15. The computer-readable device of claim 14, wherein the systems are selected from the group consisting of:

separation systems, crude metering and export pump systems, gas compression systems, gas dehydration systems, gas sweetening systems, hydrocarbon dew point control systems, condensate disposal systems, produced water treatment systems, relief systems, water injection systems, power systems, heating and cooling medium, systems, raw water systems, fire protection systems, drilling systems, accommodations, and structural steel.

16. The computer-readable device of claim 14, wherein the system requirements are selected from the group consisting of process calculations, utility balances, system equipment, system capacity, system weight, system area, system cost, substructure size, and substructure cost.

17. The computer-readable device of claim 14, wherein the pipeline requirements are selected from the group consisting of diameter, cost, length, and type of pipeline.

18. The computer-readable device of claim 14, wherein selecting one of the system requirements from the at least two profiles comprises selecting a weight for a given system in one of the profiles that is greater or lesser than the weight for the same system in the other profiles.

19. The computer-readable device of claim 14, wherein selecting one of the system requirements from the at least two profiles comprises selecting a cost for a given system in one of the profiles that is greater or lesser than the cost for the same system in the other profiles.

20. The computer-readable device of claim 14, wherein selecting one of the system requirements from the at least two profiles comprises selecting a capacity for a given system in one of the profiles that is greater or lesser than the capacity for the same system in the other profiles.

21. The computer-readable device of claim 14, wherein selecting one of the system requirements from the at least two profiles comprises selecting an area for a given system in one of the profiles that is greater or lesser than the area for the same system in the other profiles.

22. The computer-readable device of claim 14, wherein selecting one of the system requirements from the at least two profiles comprises:

automatically comparing the system requirements for a given system in each of the at least two profiles; and

automatically selecting one of the system requirements for the given system based on the comparison.

23. The computer-readable device of claim 14, wherein selecting one of the pipeline requirements from the at least two profiles comprises selecting a diameter, a cost, a length, or a type for a given pipeline in one of the profiles that is greater or lesser than that for the same pipeline in the other profiles.

24. The computer-readable device of claim 14, wherein creating the plurality of profiles from the model comprises performing process simulations using information pertaining to the systems, the pipelines, and the production to determine the system requirements and the pipeline requirements for the profiles.

25. The computer-readable device of claim 14, wherein the method further comprises calculating controlling requirements for the systems and the pipelines of the project using information associated with the controlling case.

26. The computer-readable device of claim 25, wherein calculating controlling requirements for the systems and the pipelines of the project using information associated with the controlling case comprises recalculating structural requirements to support area and weight requirements associated with the controlling case.