MULTIPARAMETER INDEXING AND SEARCHING FOR DOCUMENTS

• US 20070088751A1
• Filed: 11/29/2006
• Published: 04/19/2007
• Est. Priority Date: 02/21/2003
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Practice Technologies, Inc. (Gannett Co., Inc.)
• Original Assignee: Practice Technologies, Inc. (Gannett Co., Inc.)
• Inventors: McGregor, Russell, DeFelice, Rudy
• Application Number:
  US11/564,577
• Publication Number:
  US 20070088751A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 1/1
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 16/345 Summarisation for human users
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 16/93 Document management systems

Abstract

A multiparameter abstract and search system for documents, e.g. legal documents. The documents are abstracted by an abstract creation engine. The abstract creation engine may process the documents based on objective criteria and subjective criteria. The processing creates a searchable abstract file that can be searched in various ways.

Claims

1. A system, comprising:

a user interface which receives a request for information about a legal task, including at least a legal category, a document type, and a jurisdiction; and

an information provider, which returns information based on said legal task, document type and jurisdiction, said information including jurisdiction-specific law for said legal issue, narrative information about the jurisdiction-specific law, and links to specific sources including information about the jurisdiction-specific law, and also includes specific local information including local information about the document type for the jurisdiction.

2. A system as in claim 1, wherein said information includes a specific judge'"'"'s rules for a certain task.

3. A system as in claim 1, wherein said information provider also returns procedural checklists for a specific task.

4. A system as in claim 1, wherein said information also includes court specific rules for a specific task.

5. A system as in claim 1, wherein said information provider includes document specific rules including information about a format of a document for a specific task.

6. A system, comprising:

an abstract creation element, receiving information about a plurality of documents, and determining, from each document, specific information about each document, based on the actual words within the document, and context of said words within the document, where said context includes at least the presence of at least one of a plurality of specified other words within the document, and which produces an abstract based on said specific information, in a searchable form.

7. A system as in claim 6, wherein said specific information includes a point of law discussed by the document.

8. A system as in claim 6, wherein said specific information includes a court name within the document.

9. A system as in claim 6, wherein said specific information includes a cite to a statute, and wherein said database includes information enabling determination of the full text of the statute.

10. A system as in claim 6, wherein said database is in hyperlinked format.

11. A system as in claim 10, wherein said database is in XML format.

12. A system as in claim 10, wherein said plurality of documents include documents produced by users of the system, and documents representing external information, and said specific information includes at least one cite to the external information, and produces a database which enables viewing said external information based on said cite.

13. A system as in claim 6, wherein said specific information includes first information enabling determination of a proper name of a specific category of person referenced within the document while excluding other proper names within the document, and second information enabling determination of a document category.

14. A system as in claim 13, wherein said proper name is a lawyer'"'"'s name, and said specified other words within the document include at least one of “

Esq”

or “

LLP”

.

15. A system as in claim 13, wherein said proper name is a judge'"'"'s name.

16. A system as in claim 13, wherein said document category represents a point of law being discussed in the document.

17. A system as in claim 13, wherein said document category represents a type of the document.

18. A computer-readable storage medium having a set of instructions for a computer having a user interface, a database, and access to a plurality of documents, the set of instructions comprising:

a first objective-extracting instruction set determining information within each document based on analysis of words in the document and a position of those words within the document to look for a specific pre-enumerated item of information from within the document;

a second subjective-extracting instruction set, determining a category for the document by searching the document; and

a third instruction set, producing a document index in a searchable form based on first and second instruction sets.

19. A medium as in claim 18, said instruction sets determine information about legal documents.

20. A medium as in claim 19, further comprising instructions which determine references to statutes within the documents, and wherein said document index includes a link to a full text of the statutes.

21. A medium as in claim 18 further comprising instructions to determine a size of the document, to compare said size of said document to a minimum size, and to prevent said first instruction set and said second instruction set from operating when said document is smaller than said minimum size.

22. A medium as in claim 18, further comprising instructions to determine specific words in the document which indicate that the document should not be indexed, and to prevent said first instruction set and said second instruction set from operating when said words are determined.

23. A medium as in claim 22, wherein said words include words indicating that the document should be discarded.

24. A medium as in claim 19, further comprising instructions to determine specified names of a certain type within the documents while excluding other names which are not of said certain type.

25. A medium as in claim 22, further comprising instructions to determine words within the document which indicate that the document is one which is intended to be discarded, and to prevent said first instruction set and said second instruction set from operating when said words are determined.

26. A medium as in claim 19, further comprising instructions to determine cites to legal statutes within the document, and to create links to full text of said legal statutes.

27. A method comprising:

using a computer to review contents of a plurality of documents;

using said computer to determine specified items of information within said documents based on context and position within the documents, while ignoring other information of the same type within the document; and

creating a searchable abstract of the documents, based on said specified items of information.

28. A method as in claim 27, wherein said specified item of information is a name of a specified kind of person, and said other information is other names within the document.

29. A method as in claim 27, wherein said specified item of information is a specified type of law.