Application portfolio assessment tool
First Claim
1. A method of creating rankings for applications, comprising:
- providing a first set of application inquiries to assess the manageability of a first application;
receiving a response to at least one application inquiry in said first set;
determining a manageability score for said first application based on said response to said at least one application inquiry in said first set;
providing a second set of application inquiries to assess the criticality of said first application;
receiving a response to at least one application inquiry in said second set;
determining a criticality score for said first application based on said response to said at least one application inquiry in said second set; and
creating a ranking for said first application based on said manageability score and said criticality score.
3 Assignments
0 Petitions
Accused Products
Abstract
An application portfolio assessment tool and related techniques are provided. The manageability and criticality of a software application implementation are determined to evaluate and compare one or more applications. Sets of application inquiries to assess the manageability and criticality of the application are provided and responses received. Each response is scaled and multiplied by a weighting associated with the corresponding application inquiry. The determined values for each inquiry directed to manageability can be used to calculate a manageability score and the determined values for each inquiry directed to criticality can be used to calculate a criticality score. The results can be graphically depicted to illustrate the relative characteristics of one or more applications. Application risk exposure assessments can also be made using application inquiries. Using the manageability and criticality scores, applications can be selected for performance profiling.
-
Citations
58 Claims
-
1. A method of creating rankings for applications, comprising:
-
providing a first set of application inquiries to assess the manageability of a first application;
receiving a response to at least one application inquiry in said first set;
determining a manageability score for said first application based on said response to said at least one application inquiry in said first set;
providing a second set of application inquiries to assess the criticality of said first application;
receiving a response to at least one application inquiry in said second set;
determining a criticality score for said first application based on said response to said at least one application inquiry in said second set; and
creating a ranking for said first application based on said manageability score and said criticality score. - View Dependent Claims (2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29)
-
-
14. The method of claim 14, wherein said step of providing an assessment of an availability of said first application and an assessment of a performance of first said application comprises:
-
determining and providing an availability percentage of said first application;
determining and providing a performance capacity percentage of said first application. - View Dependent Claims (15, 16, 17, 18)
-
-
30. One or more processor readable storage devices having processor readable code embodied on said one or more processor readable storage devices, said processor readable code for programming one or more processors to perform a method comprising:
-
providing a first set of application inquiries to assess the manageability of a first application;
receiving a response to at least one application inquiry in said first set;
determining a manageability score for said first application based on said response to said at least one application inquiry in said first set;
providing a second set of application inquiries to assess the criticality of said first application;
receiving a response to at least one application inquiry in said second set; and
determining a criticality score for said first application based on said response to said at least one application inquiry in said second set; and
creating a ranking for said first application based on said manageability score and said criticality score. - View Dependent Claims (31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38)
-
-
39. A method of evaluating applications, comprising:
-
receiving at least one response to a first set of application inquiries, said first set of application inquiries directed to assessing manageability of a first application and including a weighting for each application inquiry in said first set;
receiving at least one response to a second set of application inquiries, said second set of application inquiries directed to assessing criticality of said first application and including a weighting for each application inquiry in said second set;
determining a manageability score for said first application based on said at least one response to said first set of application inquiries;
determining a criticality score for said first application based on said at least one response to said second set of application inquiries; and
creating a graphical representation based on said manageability score and said criticality score. - View Dependent Claims (40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51)
-
-
52. A method of creating rankings for applications, comprising:
-
receiving at least one response to a first set of application inquiries, said first set of application inquiries directed to assessing manageability of a first application and including a weighting for each application inquiry in said first set;
receiving at least one response to a second set of application inquiries, said second set of application inquiries directed to assessing criticality of said first application and including a weighting for each application inquiry in said second set;
determining a manageability score for said first application based on said at least one response to said first set of application inquiries;
determining a criticality score for said first application based on said at least one response to said second set of application inquiries; and
performing performance profiling on said first application if said manageability score is above a first threshold value. - View Dependent Claims (53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58)
-
Specification