Functional testing and verification of software application

• US 20070101196A1
• Filed: 11/01/2005
• Published: 05/03/2007
• Est. Priority Date: 11/01/2005
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Aberro Incorporated
• Original Assignee: Aberro Incorporated
• Inventors: Rogers, William, Barta, Joseph
• Application Number:
  US11/264,416
• Publication Number:
  US 20070101196A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 714/38
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 11/3664 Environments for testing or debugging software
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 11/3688 for test execution, e.g. scheduling of test suites

Abstract

The present disclosure provides methods for testing a software application using the natural input flow of the application. In one respect, a method includes observing the software application under test to determine a current, active input site of the application. The method generates a stimulus for the current, active input site based on the current execution state of the application and applies the stimulus to the current, active input site. The response of the stimulus may be evaluated. In one respect, the response may be evaluated prior to and after the stimulus is applied.

Claims

1. A method for testing a software application, comprising:

providing a tester for testing the software application, where testing comprises;

monitoring the software application during natural execution to determine an active focus site of the software application;

generating a stimulus for the active focus site based on a current execution state of the application;

applying the stimulus to the active focus site; and

monitoring a response of the application to the stimulus.

2. The method of claim 1, further comprising evaluating a rule associated with the active focus site prior to the step of applying the stimulus.

3. The method of claim 2, the rule comprising a filter portion and a check portion.

4. The method of claim 2, the rule comprising an expected result from the software application after the stimulus is applied.

5. The method of claim 2, where a result of the step of evaluating a rule comprises Pass, Fail, Schedule, Immediate, or Ignore.

6. The method of claim 5, where if the result of evaluating the rule is Schedule, the method further comprises evaluating the rule after the step of monitoring the response to the application.

7. The method of claim 5, where if the result of evaluating the rule is Immediate, the method further comprises evaluating the rule prior to applying the stimulus to the active site.

8. The method of claim 1, further comprising determining a next active focus site.

9. The method of claim 8, where the next focus site occurs naturally in the application after the active focus site.

10. The method of claim 8, where the next focus site is selected randomly.

11. A program storage device readable by a machine, tangibly embodying a program of instructions executable by the machine to perform the method steps of claim 1.

12. A method for evaluating a software application test, comprising:

providing a tester for testing the software application, where testing comprises;

performing a first verification step to determine if a stimulus to be provided to an active focus site of the application would be valid;

providing the stimulus to the active focus site of the application; and

performing a second verification step to determine if the application responds correctly to the stimulus, where the first and second verification steps are distinct from the step of providing the stimulus.

13. The method of claim 12, where performing a first verification step comprises evaluating at least one rule associated with the active focus site.

14. The method of claim 13, where the at least one rule is associated with a current state of the software application.

15. The method of claim 12, where a result of the first verification step includes Pass, Fail, Schedule, Immediate, or Ignore.

16. The method of claim 15, where if the result of the first verification step is Immediate, performing the second verification step after the first verification step.

17. The method of claim 12, where a result of the second verification step includes Pass or Fail.

18. A method for testing a software application, comprising:

providing a tester for testing the software application, where testing comprises;

monitoring the software application during natural execution to determine an active focus site of the software application;

performing a first verification step to determine if a stimulus to be provided to an active focus site of the application would be valid

generating the stimulus for the active focus site based on a current execution state of the application;

applying the stimulus to the active focus site; and

performing a second verification step to determine if the application responds correctly to the stimulus, where the first and second verification steps are distinct from the step of providing the stimulus;