Automatic power saving in a grid environment

• US 20070124684A1
• Filed: 11/30/2005
• Published: 05/31/2007
• Est. Priority Date: 11/30/2005
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Red Hat, Inc. (International Business Machines Corporation)
• Original Assignee: Red Hat, Inc. (International Business Machines Corporation)
• Inventors: Crenshaw, Scott, Hohberger, Lon, Riel, Henri Han
• Application Number:
  US11/289,400
• Publication Number:
  US 20070124684A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 715/736
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 9/5088 involving task migration
• CPC Class Codes: Y02D 10/00 Energy efficient computing, e.g. low power processors, power management or thermal management

Abstract

A global power management for a grid is provided. A grid administrator is connected to the group nodes of the grid. During operation, the grid administrator calculates the cost of operations, such as electricity and cooling costs, and migrates the workload of the grid to minimize the cost of operations. In particular, the grid administrator may deactivate or power down one or more of the nodes in order to minimize the cost of operations.

Claims

1. A method of optimizing a configuration of a grid of nodes, said method comprising:

determining a workload requested from the grid of nodes;

determining a set of configurations of nodes that satisfy the workload;

determining a cost of operations for each configuration in the set of configurations;

selecting at least one of the configurations based on the cost of operations; and

deactivating nodes based on the selected at least one configuration.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein determining the workload requested from the grid of nodes comprises:

determining a trend of the workload based on a history of previous workloads; and

determining an anticipated change in the workload based on the trend.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein determining the set of configurations of nodes that satisfy the workload comprises determining a minimum number nodes that can satisfy the workload.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein determining the set of configurations that satisfy the workload comprises:

determining a location from which the workload is being requested; and

determining the set of configurations that satisfy the workload based on nodes that are in proximity to the location.

5. The method of claim 1, wherein determining the set of configurations that satisfy the workload comprises:

determining service level agreements associated with the nodes; and

determining the set of configurations that satisfy the workload based the service level agreements.

6. The method of claim 1, wherein determining the cost of operations for each configuration comprises determining a cost of electricity for each configuration.

7. The method of claim 1, wherein determining the cost of operations for each configuration comprises determining a total of multiple costs for each configuration.

8. The method of claim 1, wherein determining the cost of operations comprises determining a cost of cooling for each configuration.

9. The method of claim 1, wherein determining the cost of operations comprises determining a cost of labor for each configuration.

10. The method of claim 1, wherein selecting at least one of the configurations based on the cost of operations comprises selecting a configuration having the lowest cost of operations.

11. The method of claim 1, wherein selecting at least one of the configurations based on the cost of operations comprises:

determining a desired amount of capacity in excess of the workload; and

selecting at least one of the configurations based on the desired amount excess capacity and the cost operations.

12. The method of claim 1, wherein deactivating nodes based on the selected at least one configuration comprises:

determining nodes that are unnecessary to the selected at least one configuration; and

powering down the unnecessary nodes.

13. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

identifying an expected increase in the workload requested from the nodes; and

reactivating at least some of the deactivated nodes based on the expected increase.

14. A computer readable medium comprising computer executable instructions for performing the method of claim 1.

15. An apparatus configured to perform the method of claim 1.

16. A system comprising:

a grid of nodes configured to satisfy requested workloads; and

a grid administrator configured to monitor the workload requested from the grid of nodes, determine a set of configurations of nodes that satisfy the workload, determine a cost of operations for each configuration in the set of configurations, selecting at least one of the configurations based on the cost of operations, and deactivate nodes based on the selected at least one configuration.

17. The system of claim 16, wherein the grid administrator is configured to determine the cost of operations for each configuration based on electricity costs for each configuration.

18. The system of claim 16, wherein the grid administrator is configured to determine the cost of operations for each configuration based on cooling costs for each configuration.

19. The system of claim 16, wherein the grid administrator is configured to determine an expected increase in the workload requested from the grid of nodes and reactivate at least some of the nodes based on the expected increase in the workload.

20. The system of claim 16, wherein the grid administrator is configured to determine a desired amount of capacity in excess of the workload and select at least one of the configurations based on the desired amount excess capacity and the cost operations.