Stakeholder interests system and method

• US 20070136113A1
• Filed: 06/16/2004
• Published: 06/14/2007
• Est. Priority Date: 06/16/2003
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Redbank Manor Pty Limited
• Original Assignee: Redbank Manor Pty Limited
• Inventors: Wilson, Eric
• Application Number:
  US10/560,916
• Publication Number:
  US 20070136113A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 705/7
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/06 Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 30/02 Marketing; Price estimation or determination; Fundraising

Abstract

Stakeholders with an interest in content or digital works create business models which are associated by virtue of their position in a hierarchy. This positioning often corresponds to the structure of collections of content or digital works. When these are requested, business model reconciliation occurs by consulting the relevant sibling, descendant or ascendant business models, taking information from them and resolving conflicts between them to construct composite business models. Also taking into account stand-alone business models covering special cases such as loose content bundles, the resulting composite business models determine content access conditions plus the levying and distribution of fees between the participating stakeholders. The invention has applications in various forms of publishing, ticketing and document-based e-commerce.

Claims

1. A system for defining, reconciling and determining interactions between content stakeholders or stakeholders in digital works comprising:

Stakeholder systems which associate business models with content or digital works or their hierachical repositories;

business model reconciliation engines for finding and checking said business models, suitably combining and evaluating said applicable business models into composite business models, for determining the levying of fees or distribution of fees.

2. The system of claim 1 with one or more reporting engines predicting financial or other outcomes of a defined set of business models.

3. The system of claim 1 where one or more stand-alone business models are also evaluated by a reconciliation engine.

4. The system of claim 1 where business model reconciliation engines also support loosely bundled content.

5. The system of claim 3 where one or more stand-alone business models are explicitly invoked-when appended to a particular URL

6. The system of claim 3 where one or more stand-alone business models are invoked by implication, according to which page a request for content or digital works is received.

7. The system of claim 3 where business models contain references to other business models residing In an unrelated hierarchy or branch of a hierarchy.

8. The system of claim 7 where more than one reconciliation engine is triggered to make an appropriate determination.

9. The system of claim 1 where stakeholder systems mark up content to associate those interests with business models.

10. The system of claim 1 where content or content containers are examined to determine stakeholder interests.

11. The system of claim 1 where stakeholder systems associate business models with specific elements within content or a digital work.

12. The system of claim 1 where business models apply different fee structures to transactions involving cleared funds and those still pending, or those with good payment histories and those who are unknown, or incentives for transactions posing lesser risks.

13. The system of claim 1 where the content grants title to goods, services or property.

14. The system of claim 13 where the-granting of title is to one or more stakeholders.

15. The method of reconciling business models including the steps of:

Receiving a request for a business model by specifying one or more desired content accesses;

Finding the related one or more business models to the request located in one or more hierarchies;

Combining information from the business models to create composite business models.

Sending the composite business model to the calling process for the levying of fees or distribution of fees.

16. The method of claim 15 where one or more stand-alone business models are specified for inclusion in the composite business model.