System and method for analyzing communications using multi-dimensional hierarchical structures

• US 20070143310A1
• Filed: 12/16/2005
• Published: 06/21/2007
• Est. Priority Date: 12/16/2005
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Eric Vigen
• Original Assignee: Eric Vigen
• Inventors: Vigen, Eric
• Application Number:
  US11/303,304
• Publication Number:
  US 20070143310A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 1/1
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 40/253 Grammatical analysis; Style critique

Abstract

A system and method is provided which processes communication into a useful multi-dimensional, hierarchical structure that illustrates visible multi-dimensional relationships between elements of the communication and also provides an understanding of the concepts underlying the communication. A communication is initially separated into its constituent elements. Queries to structured databases and novel relational tables are then performed to reference predetermined relationships between the communication elements and hierarchical categories, where information placements in the databases and tables are utilized to generate a hierarchical structure corresponding to the communication that provides a visual analysis and/or interpretation of the communication. By understanding the underlying concepts of the communication, an automated communications analysis system is provided that allows prompt procedures, such as the grading and evaluation of writing, to be performed in an accurate manner.

Claims

30. A system for analyzing communication comprising:

a processor;

a computer-readable medium having computer-executable instructions stored thereon for analyzing communication by performing the steps of;

receiving a communication including at least one communication element;

transforming the communication into a hierarchical structure corresponding to the communication elements;

analyzing the hierarchical structure to generate an output based on the received communication.

31. The system of claim 30, wherein the hierarchical structure is formed to be an array of at least k dimensions (k≧

1), where each dimension consists of classification information relevant to organization, meaning, reference, or understanding of the communication.

32. The system of claim 31, further comprising forming a dictionary database containing communication elements along with corresponding information placements that describe locations in the hierarchical structure where a respective communication element should be placed.

33. The system of claim 32, wherein the computer-readable medium further comprises computer-executable instructions for transforming the communication elements into the hierarchical structure by:

querying the dictionary database to determine if a received communication element exists in the dictionary database;

retrieving the corresponding information placements for those communication elements that are found to exist in the dictionary database; and

creating the hierarchical structure by inserting the retrieved information placements into their prescribed locations in the hierarchical structure.

34. The system of claim 33, wherein the computer-readable medium further comprises computer-executable instructions for using completion rules to insert additional information into the hierarchical structure that is missing after performing the dictionary database retrieval.

35. The system of claim 34, wherein the completion rules are determined from a completion table.

36. The system of claim 30, wherein the computer-readable medium further comprises computer-executable instructions for dividing the received communication into selected groupings of communication elements to be transformed into the hierarchical structure.

37. The system of claim 36, wherein the computer-readable medium further comprises computer-executable instructions for selecting the groupings of communication elements by segmenting process step phrases into groups of communication elements that can be analyzed together and possess the same process step.

38. The system of claim 30, wherein the hierarchical structure includes a situation dimension including classification information related to situation criteria.

39. The system of claim 38, wherein the situation dimension of the hierarchical structure includes at least one subclassification from the following subclassifications:

parties, location, time, resources, abilities, beliefs and goals.

40. The system of claim 30, wherein the hierarchical structure includes a process dimension including classification information related to process criteria.

41. The system of claim 40, wherein the process dimension of the hierarchical structure includes at least one subclassification from the following subclassifications:

knowledge, analysis, action and results.

42. The system of claim 41, wherein the process dimension of the hierarchical structure further includes the subclassifications decision and feedback.

43. The system of claim 30, wherein the hierarchical structure includes a value dimension including classification information related to the relative weighting of positives and negatives in a communication.

44. The system of claim 43, wherein the value dimension of the hierarchical structure includes weighted subclassications.

45. The system of claim 44, wherein the weighted subclassifications include from highest weighting to lowest weighting:

practical reality, basic respect and self-protection, core personal beliefs, higher order goals, interaction commitments and lower order goals.

46. The system of claim 45, wherein the computer-readable medium further comprises computer-executable instructions for generating output as an analysis of positive and negative communication elements versus their weighted subclassifications.

47. The system of claim 43, wherein the value dimension further includes neutral and offset classification information related to the relative weighting of positives and negatives in a communication.

48. The system of claim 30, wherein the hierarchical structure includes a view dimension including classification information related to comparisons, orderings, and variances used to classify relative values based on perspective.

49. The system of claim 30, wherein the hierarchical structure includes a situation dimension and a process dimension, wherein the situation dimension includes classification information related to situation criteria and the process dimension includes classification information related to process criteria.

50. The system of claim 49, wherein the computer-readable medium further comprises computer-executable instructions for generating output as an analysis of the situation versus process dimensions.

51. The system of claim 49, wherein the hierarchical structure further includes at least one of a value dimension and a view dimension, wherein the value dimension includes classification information related to the relative weighting of positives and negatives in a communication and the view dimension includes classification information related to comparisons, orderings, and variances used to classify relative values based on perspective.

52. The system of claim 30, wherein the computer-readable medium further comprises computer-executable instructions for generating output as an improved communication of the received communication.

53. The system of claim 30, wherein the computer-readable medium further comprises computer-executable instructions for generating output as a translation of the received communication.

54. The system of claim 30, wherein the computer-readable medium further comprises computer-executable instructions for using the hierarchical structure to provide an indication of an underlying meaning of the received communication and to be used as a precise thesaurus to determine synonyms for communication elements based on this underlying meaning.

55. The system of claim 30, wherein the computer-readable medium further comprises computer-executable instructions for generating output that provides an indication of persuasiveness of the received communication based upon patterns of communication elements present in the hierarchical structure.

56. The system of claim 30, wherein the computer-readable medium further comprises computer-executable instructions for generating output that provides an indication of decision-making in the received communication based upon patterns of communication elements present in the hierarchical structure.

57. The system of claim 30, wherein the computer-readable medium further comprises computer-executable instructions for generating output that provides an indication of believability of the received communication based upon patterns of communication elements present in the hierarchical structure.

58. An automated system for analyzing communication comprising:

an input device configured to receive a communication including at least one communication element;

an output device configured to generate an output based on the communication received;

a dictionary database containing communication elements along with corresponding information placements that describe locations in a hierarchical structure where a respective communication element should be placed;

a processor;

a computer-readable medium having computer-executable instructions stored thereon for automatically analyzing communication by performing the steps of;

separating the received communication into groups of communication elements;

transforming the separated groups of communication elements into a hierarchical structure corresponding to the groups of communication elements using information placements contained the dictionary database; and

analyzing the hierarchical structure to generate an output based on the received communication.

1. A method of analyzing communication comprising:

receiving a communication including at least one communication element;

transforming the communication into a hierarchical structure corresponding to the communication elements;

analyzing the hierarchical structure to generate an output based on the received communication.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the hierarchical structure is formed to be an array of at least k dimensions (k≧

1), where each dimension consists of classification information relevant to organization, meaning, reference, or understanding of the communication.

3. The method of claim 2, further comprising forming a dictionary database containing communication elements along with corresponding information placements that describe locations in the hierarchical structure where a respective communication element should be placed.

4. The method of claim 3, wherein the communication elements are transformed into the hierarchical structure by:

querying the dictionary database to determine if a received communication element exists in the dictionary database;

retrieving the corresponding information placements for those communication elements that are found to exist in the dictionary database; and

creating the hierarchical structure by inserting the retrieved information placements into their prescribed locations in the hierarchical structure.

5. The method of claim 4, further comprising use of completion rules to insert additional information into the hierarchical structure that is missing after performing the dictionary database retrieval.

6. The method of claim 5, wherein the completion rules are determined from a completion table.

7. The method of claim 1, further comprising dividing the received communication into selected groupings of communication elements to be transformed into the hierarchical structure.

8. The method of claim 7, wherein the groupings of communication elements are selected by segmenting process step phrases into groups of communication elements that can be analyzed together and possess the same process step.

9. The method of claim 2, wherein the hierarchical structure includes a situation dimension including classification information related to situation criteria.

10. The method of claim 9, wherein the situation dimension of the hierarchical structure includes at least one subclassification from the following subclassifications:

parties, location, time, resources, abilities, beliefs and goals.

11. The method of claim 2, wherein the hierarchical structure includes a process dimension including classification information related to process criteria.

12. The method of claim 11, wherein the process dimension of the hierarchical structure includes at least one subclassification from the following subclassifications:

knowledge, analysis, action and results.

13. The method of claim 12, wherein the process dimension of the hierarchical structure further includes the subclassifications decision and feedback.

14. The method of claim 13, further comprising dividing the received communication into selected groupings of communication elements to be transformed into the hierarchical structure by segmenting process step phrases into groups of communication elements that can be analyzed together and possess the same process step, wherein process step phrases are segmented by performing the following steps:

(1) if an analysis conjunction is present in the phrase, the process step is an analysis subclassification;

(2) if no conjunction is present, then placement of the verb first in the phrase places all communication elements in the phrase as a decision subclassification;

(3) if a knowledge verb is found in the phrase but the subject or object of the phrase has a Feedback secondary communication element, then the process step is a feedback subclassification; and

(4) if none of steps (1)-(3) are satisfied, the first verb phrase in the group of communication elements is analyzed to determine which subclassification the group will be classified into.

15. The method of claim 2, wherein the hierarchical structure includes a value dimension including classification information related to the relative weighting of positives and negatives in a communication.

16. The method of claim 15, wherein the value dimension of the hierarchical structure includes weighted subclassications.

17. The method of claim 16, wherein the weighted subclassifications include from highest weighting to lowest weighting:

practical reality, basic respect and self-protection, core personal beliefs, higher order goals, interaction commitments and lower order goals.

18. The method of claim 17, wherein the generated output is an analysis of positive and negative communication elements versus their weighted subclassifications.

19. The method of claim 18, wherein the value dimension further includes neutral and offset classification information related to the relative weighting of positives and negatives in a communication.

20. The method of claim 2, wherein the hierarchical structure includes a view dimension including classification information related to comparisons, orderings, and variances used to classify relative values based on perspective.

21. The method of claim 2, wherein the hierarchical structure includes a situation dimension and a process dimension, wherein the situation dimension includes classification information related to situation criteria and the process dimension includes classification information related to process criteria.

22. The method of claim 21, wherein the generated output is an analysis of the situation versus process dimensions.

23. The method of claim 21, wherein the hierarchical structure further includes at least one of a value dimension and a view dimension, wherein the value dimension includes classification information related to the relative weighting of positives and negatives in a communication and the view dimension includes classification information related to comparisons, orderings, and variances used to classify relative values based on perspective.

24. The method of claim 1, wherein the generated output is an improved communication of the received communication.

25. The method of claim 1, wherein the generated output is a translation of the received communication.

26. The method of claim 1, wherein the hierarchical structure provides an indication of an underlying meaning of the communication and be can be utilized as a precise thesaurus to determine synonyms for communication elements based on this underlying meaning.

27. The method of claim 1, wherein the generated output provides an indication of persuasiveness of the received communication based upon patterns of communication elements present in the hierarchical structure.

28. The method of claim 1, wherein the generated output provides an indication of decision-making in the received communication based upon patterns of communication elements present in the hierarchical structure.

29. The method of claim 1, wherein the generated output provides an indication of believability of the received communication based upon patterns of communication elements present in the hierarchical structure.

59. The system of claim 58, wherein the hierarchical structure contains information relevant to organization, meaning and understanding of the communication.

60. The system of claim 58, wherein the computer-readable medium further comprises computer-executable instructions for analyzing the hierarchical structure by analyzing the location of the communication elements placed in the hierarchical structure.

61. The system of claim 60, wherein analysis of the position of each communication element in the hierarchical structure relates information relevant to the context of the communication element in the communication.

62. The system of claim 58, wherein the computer-readable medium further comprises computer-executable instructions for analyzing the hierarchical structure by analyzing resulting patterns of the communication elements placed in the hierarchical structure.

59-1. The system of claim 58, wherein the received communication is text in electronic form.

63. A method of automatically determining the meaning of communication, said method comprising:

(a) mapping a plurality of first words contained in a communication to at least one second word contained in a lexicon of words;

(b) mapping at least one informational element associated with the second word to at least one position in at least one multi-dimensional array; and

(c) using the at least one multidimensional array to produce a useful output, wherein the positional information in all of the at least one multi-dimensional array provides information relevant to the meaning of the communication and to the production of the useful output.

64. A method of analyzing communication by converting a received communication into a multi-dimensional array indicative of the underlying decision-making and persuasion set forth by the communication.

65. The method of claim 64, wherein the multi-dimensional array is further indicative of the underlying believability of the communication