Automated method to ensure network route diversity

• US 20070150177A1
• Filed: 12/27/2005
• Published: 06/28/2007
• Est. Priority Date: 12/27/2005
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Sbc Knowledge Ventures, L.P.
• Original Assignee: Sbc Knowledge Ventures, L.P.
• Inventors: Smith, Elizabeth, Esser, Charles
• Application Number:
  US11/317,007
• Publication Number:
  US 20070150177A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 701/202
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 30/18 Network design, e.g. design based on topological or interconnect aspects of utility systems, piping, heating ventilation air conditioning [HVAC] or cabling circuit design at the physical level G06F30/39; network planning tools for wireless communication networks H04W16/18

Abstract

Routing diversity is evaluated. Utility line route mapping coordinates are obtained for a first utility line route and a second utility line route. At least one utility line route mapping coordinate of the first utility line route is compared with at least one utility line route mapping coordinate of the second utility line route, to obtain at least one comparison result. The at least one comparison result is evaluated for route diversity.

Claims

1. A computer-implemented method for evaluating routing diversity, the method comprising:

obtaining utility line route mapping coordinates for a first utility line route and a second utility line route;

comparing at least one utility line route mapping coordinate of the first utility line route with at least one utility line route mapping coordinate of the second utility line route, to obtain at least one comparison result; and

evaluating the at least one comparison result for route diversity.

2. The computer-implemented method for evaluating routing diversity of claim 1, the evaluating comprising:

determining whether the first utility line route and the second utility line route conform to predetermined route diversity parameters.

3. The computer-implemented method for evaluating routing diversity of claim 1, further comprising:

comparing a comparison result of a set of utility line routes, comprising the first utility line route and the second utility line route, with a comparison result of another set of utility line routes to evaluate route diversity of the sets relative to each other.

4. The computer-implemented method for evaluating routing diversity of claim 1, wherein the utility line routes delineate telecommunications system routes.

5. The computer-implemented method for evaluating routing diversity of claim 1, further comprising:

selecting criteria for utility line route mapping coordinates to be obtained.

6. The computer-implemented method for evaluating routing diversity of claim 5, the selecting comprising:

entering criteria into fields on a graphical user interface.

7. The computer-implemented method for evaluating routing diversity of claim 2, the determining further comprising:

comparing a minimum vertical distance between utility line routes through a single location.

8. The computer-implemented method for evaluating routing diversity of claim 1, the evaluating further comprising:

determining a minimum distance between the utility routes.

9. The computer-implemented method for evaluating routing diversity of claim 1, further comprising:

selecting telecommunications carriers.

10. The computer-implemented method for evaluating routing diversity of claim 9, the obtaining further comprising:

obtaining telecommunications line route mapping coordinates for telecommunications lines corresponding to the selected telecommunications carriers.

11. A computer readable medium for storing a computer program that verifies routing diversity, comprising:

a mapping coordinates obtaining code segment that obtains utility line route mapping coordinates for a first utility line route and a second utility line route;

a comparing code segment that compares at least one utility line route mapping coordinate of the first utility line route with at least one utility line route mapping coordinate of the second utility line route, to obtain at least one comparison result; and

a route diversity evaluating code segment that evaluates the at least one comparison result for route diversity.

12. The computer readable medium of claim 11, wherein the mapping coordinates comprise latitude and longitude coordinates obtained using a global positioning satellite (GPS) device.

13. The computer readable medium of claim 11, wherein the utility line route mapping coordinates are used to display the utility line routes on a graphical user interface (GUI).

14. The computer readable medium of claim 13, wherein the utility line routes are superimposed on a map image on the graphical user interface.

15. The computer readable medium of claim 14, wherein a level of detail of the map image can be selected.

16. The computer readable medium of claim 14, further comprising:

a coordinate retrieving code segment that retrieves utility line route mapping coordinates from a database,

wherein the utility line routes are superimposed on a map image using the utility line route mapping coordinates.

17. The computer readable medium of claim 12, wherein the coordinates are associated with a geographical characteristic of terrain corresponding to the coordinates.

18. A computer system, comprising:

a retriever that obtains utility line route mapping coordinates for a first utility line route and a second utility line route;

a comparator that compares at least one utility line route mapping coordinate of the first utility line route with at least one utility line route mapping coordinate of the second utility line route, to obtain at least one comparison result; and

an evaluator that evaluates the at least one comparison result for route diversity.

19. The computer system of claim 18, further comprising:

a determiner that determines whether the first utility line route and the second utility line route conform to predetermined route diversity parameters.

20. The computer system of claim 19,

wherein the route diversity parameters comprise a minimum vertical distance between at least two utility line routes when a latitude and longitude of the at least two utility line routes coincide.

21. The computer system of claim 20,

wherein the minimum vertical distance includes at least one underground component.

22. The computer system of claim 19,

wherein the route diversity parameters comprise a minimum distance between at least two utility line routes based on latitude and longitude coordinates of the at least two utility line routes.

23. The computer system of claim 18, wherein the evaluator is configured to evaluate whether the utility line routes each pass through a common address.

24. The computer system of claim 18, wherein the evaluator is configured to evaluate whether the utility line routes each pass through at least one of a common floor, suite and room of a common address.

25. The computer system of claim 18, wherein the evaluator is configured to evaluate whether utility line routes both pass through a common geographical region.

26. The computer system of claim 18, wherein the evaluator is configured to evaluate whether utility line routes both pass through a common network equipment node.