Dynamic application tracing in virtual machine environments

• US 20070180439A1
• Filed: 02/01/2006
• Published: 08/02/2007
• Est. Priority Date: 02/01/2006
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Oracle America, Inc. (Oracle Corporation)
• Original Assignee: Sun Microsystems Incorporated (Oracle Corporation)
• Inventors: Radia, Sanjay, Krishnan, Sanjeev, Sundararajan, Athijegannathan
• Granted Patent: US 7,818,721 B2
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 717/158
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 11/3644 by instrumenting at runtime

Abstract

A method for dynamic application tracing in virtual machine environments comprises receiving an instrumentation request that includes an identification of a probe point at which instrumentation code is to be inserted within an application. The method may further comprise making a determination whether the instrumentation code meets one or more acceptance criteria. If the instrumentation code is found to be acceptable, the method may further comprise inserting the instrumentation code at the probe point within the application while the application is executing within a virtual machine, and obtaining information indicative of application state from an execution of the instrumentation code when the probe point is reached during application execution.

Claims

1. A method, comprising:

receiving an instrumentation request comprising an identification of a probe point at which instrumentation code is to be inserted within an application;

inserting the instrumentation code at the probe point within the application while the application is being executed within a first virtual machine process; and

obtaining information indicative of an application state from an execution of the instrumentation code when the probe point is reached during application execution.

2. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein the instrumentation code includes code derived from a user-generated instrumentation script written in an instrumentation programming language.

3. The method as recited in claim 1, further comprising:

verifying that the instrumentation code meets one or more acceptance criteria prior to inserting the instrumentation code at the probe point, wherein said verifying comprises determining that the instrumentation code (a) does not modify a state of the application and (b) does not include an instance of a programming construct from a set of prohibited programming constructs.

4. The method as recited in claim 1, further comprising:

receiving a source code version of the instrumentation code, wherein the source code is written in a hardware-agnostic and operating-system-agnostic instrumentation programming language; and

deriving an intermediate version of the instrumentation code from the source code version; and

deriving an executable version of the instrumentation code for insertion into the application from the intermediate version

5. The method as recited in claim 4, wherein the intermediate version of the instrumentation code is derived from the source code version within a second virtual machine process.

6. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein the application program is written in a platform-independent programming language supporting a plurality of programming constructs, wherein the identification of the probe point comprises at least one of:

a name of a particular instance of a programming construct of the plurality of programming constructs, a line number within source code corresponding to the application, and a metadata annotation within source code corresponding to the application.

7. The method as provided in claim 1, wherein identification of the probe point includes a name of a logical operation performed by the application, further comprising:

translating the name of the logical operation to a location of an instruction within an executable version of the application, wherein an execution of the instruction corresponds to an initiation of the logical operation.

8. The method as provided in claim 1, wherein said inserting comprises at least one of:

(a) loading a modified version of an executable application class for execution in the virtual machine and (b) modifying an executable application class that has already been loaded for execution in the virtual machine.

9. The method as recited in claim 1, further comprising:

compiling the instrumentation code into native instructions compatible with a hardware platform at which the virtual machine is being executed.

10. The method as recited in claim 1, further comprising:

in response to a request to disable instrumentation, removing the instrumentation code from the application while the application is being executed within the first virtual machine process.

11. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein the instrumentation request is received from an instrumentation client, further comprising:

authenticating the instrumentation client.

12. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein the application program is written in a platform-independent programming language supporting a plurality of programming constructs, and wherein the information indicative of the application state includes a state of an instance of a programming construct of the plurality of programming constructs.

13. A computer readable medium comprising program instructions, wherein the instructions are computer-executable to:

receive an instrumentation request comprising an identification of a probe point at which instrumentation code is to be inserted within an application;

insert the instrumentation code at the probe point within the application while the application is being executed within a first virtual machine process; and

obtain information indicative of an application state from an execution of the instrumentation code when the probe point is reached during application execution.

14. The computer readable medium as recited in claim 13, wherein the instrumentation code includes code derived from a user-generated instrumentation script written in a platform-independent instrumentation programming language.

15. The computer readable medium as recited in claim 13, wherein the instructions are further computer-executable to:

verify that the instrumentation code meets one or more acceptance criteria prior to inserting the instrumentation code at the probe point, wherein said verifying comprises determining that the instrumentation code (a) does not modify a state of the application and (b) does not include an instance of a programming construct from a set of prohibited programming constructs.

16. The computer readable medium as recited in claim 13, wherein the identification of the probe point includes a name of a logical operation performed by the application, wherein the instructions are further computer-executable to:

translate the name of the logical operation to a location of an instruction within an executable version of the application, wherein an execution of the instruction corresponds to an initiation of the logical operation.

17. A system, comprising:

a processor; and

a memory coupled to the processor and configured to store program instructions executable by the processor to;

receive an instrumentation request comprising an identification of a probe point at which instrumentation code is to be inserted within an application;

insert the instrumentation code at the probe point within the application while the application is being executed within a first virtual machine process; and

obtain information indicative of an application state from an execution of the instrumentation code when the probe point is reached during application execution.

18. The system as recited in claim 17, wherein the instrumentation code includes code derived from a user-generated instrumentation script written in a platform-independent instrumentation programming language.

19. The system as recited in claim 17, the instructions are further executable to:

verify that the instrumentation code meets one or more acceptance criteria prior to inserting the instrumentation code at the probe point, wherein said verifying comprises determining that the instrumentation code (a) does not modify a state of the application and (b) does not include an instance of a programming construct from a set of prohibited programming constructs.

20. The system as recited in claim 17, wherein the identification of the probe point includes a name of a logical operation performed by the application, wherein the instructions are further executable to:

translate the name of the logical operation to a location of an instruction within an executable version of the application, wherein an execution of the instruction corresponds to an initiation of the logical operation.