Security system and method

• US 20070180525A1
• Filed: 01/30/2006
• Published: 08/02/2007
• Est. Priority Date: 01/30/2006
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Robert Bagnall
• Original Assignee: Robert Bagnall
• Inventors: Bagnall, Robert
• Application Number:
  US11/342,506
• Publication Number:
  US 20070180525A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 726/23
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/10 Office automation; Time management

Abstract

A method and system for providing security to organizations having data and information, involving a vision specific to the organization by gathering information and determining current and future plans and needs, a scenario for protection from invasive activities including cyber-space and physical invasion, and intelligence to assist in determining protection. Also included are present and needed environmental concerns and threats, present and needed physical components, present and needed education and training for end users with access to the information, operations by examination, monitoring and detailing present and needed processes, and cyber presence including one or more computers, functions, locations, configurations, and trust relationships. Also considered are the importance of proprietary information, off-site back-ups, access-level restrictions to data, log books and preventions to minimize down-time of systems due to maintenance or attack. Also involved are collecting data, correlating the data, analyzing the data, providing reports, and evolving the method based upon information gathered.

Claims

1. A method for providing security to organizations having data and information, comprising:

(a) determining a vision specific to the organization by gathering information from the organization and determining its current and future plans and needs from such information;

(b) determining a scenario for protection of such information and for the organization from invasive activities including cyber-space and physical invasion;

(c) gathering intelligence from the corporation to assist in determining the scenario for protection; and

(d) implementing the scenario.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the steps (a) through (c) involve a digital defense method and a digital defense process.

3. The method of claim 2, wherein the digital defense method comprises at least one and preferably all of the following steps:

(a) determining the organization'"'"'s present and needed environmental concerns and threats;

(b) determining the organization'"'"'s present and needed physical components;

(c) determining the organization'"'"'s present and needed education and training for end users with access to the information;

(d) after determining 3(a) and 3(b), determining operations by examination, monitoring and detailing present and needed processes; and

(e) after 3(a) through 3(d) have been completed, determining cyber presence, needs and plans including one or more computers, functions, locations, configurations, and trust relationships.

4. The method of claim 3 wherein step (c) comprises at least considering one of the following issues and preferably considering them all:

(a) the importance to the organization of proprietary information;

(b) whether critical data is backed up off-site;

(c) access-level restrictions to data, ranked in accordance both with the data and the “

need to know”

of those with access, as well as log books and the like showing dates and times of access and data accessed;

(d) deterining whether preventions are in place to avoid or minimize down-time of systems due to maintenance or attack; and

(e) determining the existence of other vulnerabilities or risks not easily recognized.

5. The method of claim 2, wherein the digital defense process comprises at least one and preferably all of the following steps:

(a) collecting data concerning the organization;

(b) correlating the data collected by enabling filtration of security-relevant from irrelevant data;

(c) analyzing the data and information collected;

(d) providing at least one report on the current and future security status of the organization; and

(e) evolving the method in accordance with performance, data and information after the digital processes are employed.

6. A predominantly digital system for providing security to an organization having data and information stored in a multiplicity of locations that include paper and digital storage, comprising:

(a) determining means for determining the organization'"'"'s present and needed environmental concerns and threats and for providing satisfaction of such needs;

(b) determining means for determining the organization'"'"'s present and needed physical components for security and providing satisfaction of such needs;

(c) determining means for determining the organization'"'"'s present and needed education and training for end users with access to the data or information and for providing satisfaction of such needs;

(d) after determining 6(a) and 6(b), determining means for determining operations by examination, monitoring and detailing present and needed processes and for providing satisfaction of such needs; and

(e) after 6(a) through 6(d) have been completed, determining means for determining and providing cyber presence including one or more computers, functions, locations, configurations, and trust relationships.

7. The system of claim 6 wherein step (c) comprises at least considering one of the following issues and preferably considering them all:

(a) the importance to the organization of proprietary information;

(b) whether critical data is backed up off-site;

(c) access-level restrictions to data, ranked in accordance both with the data and the “

need to know”

of those with access, as well as log books and the like showing dates and times of access and data accessed;

(d) determining whether preventions are in place to avoid or minimize down-time of systems due to maintenance or attack; and

(e) determining the existence of other vulnerabilities or risks not easily recognized.

8. The system of claim 6, wherein the digital defense process comprises at least one and preferably all of the following steps:

(a) collecting data concerning the organization;

(b) correlating the data collected by enabling filtration of security-relevant from irrelevant data;

(c) analyzing the data and information collected;

(d) providing at least one report on the current and future security status of the organization; and

(e) evolving the system in accordance with performance, data and information after the digital processes are employed.

9. The system of claim 8, further comprising at least one of the following components:

(a) an active defense division for 24/7/365 security provision;

(b) a research and development division for creation of greater security devices and processes;

(c) a knowledge division for the provision of a knowledge base as well as at least training, awareness, education, and policy;

(d) an analysis component for managing the information and the knowledge base;

(e) an information warfare warehouse with analysis as the core component, including storage and analysis of network traffic, assessment of potential vulnerabilities and penetrations, and alerts to the active defense division when anomalies are discovered;

(f) a report containing a focused coverage of a prior period of cyber and other events and a discussion of emerging trends in the industry and organization including, without limitation, tips, education and opinion designed to promote thought in the organization and provoke industry-leading discussion;

(g) a cyber-intelligence well output of the system, including a library of electronic documents covering, among other things, cyber capability and threats;

(h) a 2-minute offense comprising a daily report digest of internal dynamics for the active defense division to be able to provide rapid response;

(i) a distributed security/warfare component for specific security functions for offensive use;

(j) a malware analysis and rating criteria comprising a tabular system for rating and analyzing malware;

(k) a standard for incident measurement and exposure for networks for rating vulnerability exposure comprises an array of components larger than the malware analysis;

(l) a methodology for incident prevention and response for evolutionary change in the system; and

(m) a security protection factor for provision of a measurable number for demonstrating the current state of a client'"'"'s security.