Method of identifying and localizing drainage tile problems

• US 20070208510A1
• Filed: 03/02/2006
• Published: 09/06/2007
• Est. Priority Date: 03/02/2006
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Deere & Company
• Original Assignee: Deere & Company
• Inventors: Stelford, Mark, Faivre, Stephen, Anderson, Noel
• Application Number:
  US11/366,065
• Publication Number:
  US 20070208510A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 702/2
• CPC Class Codes: E02B 11/00 Drainage of soil, e.g. for agricultural purposes draining sports grounds E01C13/083; for consolidating foundation soil, e.g. sand drain piles E02D3/10

Abstract

A method of identifying drainage tile problems in a field including steps of detecting, predicting and comparing moisture levels. The steps including detecting a moisture level at predetermined locations in the field; predicting moisture levels at the predetermined locations; and comparing the moisture levels detected in the detecting step with the moisture levels predicted in the predicting step.

Claims

1. A method of identifying drainage tile problems in a field, comprising the steps of:

detecting moisture levels at predetermined locations in the field;

predicting moisture levels at said predetermined locations; and

comparing said moisture levels detected in said detecting step with said moisture levels predicted in said predicting step.

2. The method of claim 1, further comprising the step of interpreting information from said comparing step to identify the problem with the drainage tile.

3. The method of claim 2, further comprising the step of assigning the problem to a locality of the drainage tile.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein said detecting step is carried out by a transfer of information from moisture sensors located at each of said predetermined locations.

5. The method of claim 1, wherein said moisture levels detected in said detecting step are arranged in a first matrix and said moisture levels predicted in said predicting step are arranged in a corresponding second matrix.

6. The method of claim 5, wherein said comparing step is a differencing step in which said first matrix and said second matrix are differenced.

7. The method of claim 5, wherein said first matrix is associated with a date and time and is saved as one of a plurality of saved first matrices.

8. The method of claim 7, wherein said predicting step uses information in said plurality of saved first matrices to predict moisture levels.

9. The method of claim 1, wherein said comparing step uses information obtained proximate to neighboring drainage tiles to detect the location of the problem.

10. The method of claim 1, wherein said comparing step uses information obtained along a drainage tile branch to detect the location of the problem.

11. The method of claim 1, wherein said comparing step determines that the problem is downstream of an outlet tile if a significant number of said moisture levels detected in said detecting step are higher than said moisture levels predicted in said predicting step.

12. The method of claim 1, wherein said comparing step determines that the problem is due to soil compaction if said moisture levels are uniformly high near the soil surface as compared to moisture levels at deeper levels.

13. The method of claim 1, wherein said detecting step uses information from at least one of absorbed light and reflected light to establish said moisture levels at said predetermined locations.

14. The method of claim 1, wherein said detecting step is repeated over predetermined time periods to produce a time sequence of data.

15. The method of claim 14, wherein said time sequence of data is used in said prediction step to predict a speed of drying of the field.

16. The method of claim 15, further comprising the step of compensating said speed of drying with evapotranspiration factors.

17. The method of claim 1, wherein the problem is one of a blockage and a partial obstruction of the drainage tile.

18. A method of identifying drainage tile problems in a field, comprising the steps of:

measuring moisture levels at a predetermined time at a geographical location in the field;

calculating moisture levels for said geographical location for said predetermined time; and

comparing said moisture levels measured in said measuring step with said moisture levels calculated in said calculating step.

19. The method of claim 18, further comprising the step of interpreting information from said comparing step to identify the problem with the drainage tile.

20. The method of claim 19, further comprising the step of assigning the problem to a particular locality of the drainage tile in the field.

21. The method of claim 18, wherein said moisture levels measured in said measuring step are arranged in a first matrix and said moisture levels calculated in said calculating step are arranged in a corresponding second matrix.

22. The method of claim 21, wherein said comparing step is a differencing step in which said first matrix and said second matrix are differenced.