Rubidium elution system control

• US 20070213848A1
• Filed: 03/10/2006
• Published: 09/13/2007
• Est. Priority Date: 03/10/2006
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Ottawa Heart Institute Research Corporation
• Original Assignee: Ottawa Heart Institute Research Corporation
• Inventors: deKemp, Robert, Klein, Ran
• Granted Patent: US 7,813,841 B2
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 700/32
• CPC Class Codes: A61M 5/007 for contrast media
• CPC Class Codes: G05B 13/024 in which a parameter or coefficient is automatically adjusted to optimise the performance

Abstract

A method of controlling an ⁸²Sr/⁸²Rb elution system having a generator valve for proportioning a flow of saline solution between an ⁸²Sr/⁸²Rb generator and a bypass line coupled to an outlet of the generator such that saline solution traversing the bypass line will merge with eluted saline solution emerging from the generator to provide an active saline solution. During each elution run, a plurality of successive concentration parameter values are obtained at predetermined intervals. Each concentration parameter value is indicative of a respective instantaneous activity concentration of the active saline solution. Respective error values between each concentration parameter value and a target activity concentration value of the elution run are computed. Error data based on a plurality of the computed error values is accumulated. Between successive elution runs, at least one performance parameter of the elution system is adjusted based on the accumulated error data.

Claims

1. A method of controlling an ⁸²Sr/⁸²Rb elution system having a generator valve for proportioning a flow of saline solution between an ⁸²Sr/⁸²Rb generator and a bypass line coupled to an outlet of the generator such that saline solution traversing the bypass line will merge with eluted saline solution emerging from the generator to provide an active saline solution, the method comprising steps of:

during each elution run;

obtaining a plurality of successive concentration parameter values at predetermined intervals, each concentration parameter value being indicative of a respective instantaneous activity concentration of the active saline solution;

computing respective error values between each concentration parameter value and a target activity concentration value of the elution run; and

accumulating error data based on a plurality of the computed error values; and

between successive elution runs, adjusting at least one performance parameter of the elution system based on the accumulated error data.

2. A method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the step of adjusting at least one performance parameter of the elution system comprises a step of tuning a performance model of the generator valve.

3. A method as claimed in claim 2, wherein the accumulated error data comprises the computed error values as a function of an estimated flow ratio.

4. A method as claimed in claim 3, wherein the step of tuning a performance model of the generator valve comprises steps of:

calculating a slope of the error data; and

adjusting a response slope parameter of the generator valve model based on the calculated slope of the error data.

5. A method as claimed in claim 2, wherein the error data comprises one or more error values accumulated during a period in which a target activity concentration of an elution exceeds the predicted activity concentration of that elution.

6. A method as claimed in claim 5, wherein the step of tuning a performance model of the generator valve comprises steps of:

calculating a slope of the error data; and

adjusting an upper limit parameter of the generator valve based on the calculated slope of the error data.

7. A method as claimed in claim 6, wherein the step of adjusting the upper limit parameter comprises steps of:

if the calculated slope is zero, reducing the upper limit parameter by a predetermined increment; and

otherwise, calculating an adjusted upper limit parameter value using the calculated slope.

8. A method as claimed in claim 2, wherein the error data comprises a difference between a predicted elution duration required to achieve a desired total activity dose and an actual elution duration.

9. A method as claimed in claim 8, wherein the step of tuning a performance model of the generator valve comprises a step of adjusting a hysteresis factor H based on the difference between the predicted and actual elution durations.

10. A method as claimed in claim 1, further comprising a step of enforcing a predetermined delay between successive elution runs.

11. A method as claimed in claim 1, further comprising steps of:

defining a plurality of operating modes of the elution system; and

during each elution run, automatically transitioning between selected ones of the operating modes, in accordance with user-input parameters of the elution run.

12. A method as claimed in claim 11, wherein the plurality of operating modes comprise:

a “

Bypass-to-waste”

mode in which the entire saline flow is directed through the bypass line and into a waste reservoir;

a “

patient line flush”

mode in which the saline flow is directed through the bypass line and out through a patient outlet;

a “

waiting for threshold”

mode in which the saline flow is directed through the generator, and the active saline solution directed into the waste reservoir; and

an “

elution”

mode in which the saline flow is proportioned between the generator and the bypass line, and the active saline solution directed out through the patient outlet.

13. A method as claimed in claim 11, wherein the user-input parameters comprise:

at least one of a desired duration of the elution, and a desired saline flow rate; and

at least one of a target activity concentration profile, and a total eluted activity dose.

14. A method as claimed in claim 1, further comprising steps of:

defining a set of one or more predetermined elution runs, each having respective set of predetermined parameters; and

executing the set of predetermined elution runs in accordance with a predetermined schedule.

15. A method as claimed in claim 14, wherein the predetermined schedule defines a daily protocol.

16. A method as claimed in claim 14, wherein the set of one or more predetermined elution runs comprises a calibration elution for calibrating any one or more of:

a performance of the generator;

a proportionality constant between the concentration parameter value and the instantaneous activity concentration of the active saline solution.

17. A method as claimed in claim 16, wherein the calibrated performance of the generator comprises either one or both of:

⁸²Rb activity concentration vs. eluted volume; and

⁸²Sr breakthrough.

18. A positron detector for detecting instantaneous ⁸²Rb activity concentration of an active saline solution generated by an ⁸²Sr/⁸²Rb elution system, the positron detector comprising:

a scintillation fiber disposed adjacent a feed line for conveying the active saline solution;

a photon counter operatively coupled to the scintillation fiber for detecting photons generated by positron annihilation within the scintillation fiber; and

a radiation shield surrounding the scintillation fiber and at least a portion of the feed line, for shielding at least the scintillation fiber from spurious radiation.

19. A positron detector as claimed in claim 18, wherein a thickness of the radiation shield is on the order of ½

inch.

20. A positron detector as claimed in claim 18, wherein the radiation shield surrounds a length of the feed line corresponding to at least five times an outer diameter or the feed line, in each direction from the scintillation fiber.