Systems and Methods for Hold Periods Based Upon Risk Analysis

• US 20070233599A1
• Filed: 06/01/2007
• Published: 10/04/2007
• Est. Priority Date: 12/28/2000
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Cheryl Ward, Paul Lyda, Peter Kight, Peter Moenickheim, Ravi Ganesan, Timothy Renshaw
• Original Assignee: Cheryl Ward, Paul Lyda, Peter Kight, Peter Moenickheim, Ravi Ganesan, Timothy Renshaw
• Inventors: Ganesan, Ravi, Kight, Peter, Moenickheim, Peter, Renshaw, Timothy, Lyda, Paul, Ward, Cheryl
• Application Number:
  US11/757,021
• Publication Number:
  US 20070233599A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 705/40
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 20/04 Payment circuits
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 20/102 Bill distribution or payments
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 20/24 Credit schemes, i.e. "pay after"
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 20/403 Solvency checks
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 40/02 Banking, e.g. interest calculation or account maintenance credit or loans G06Q40/03

Abstract

Systems and methods are provided for determining hold periods based upon risk analysis. The systems and methods may include receiving, via a network, a payment request to make a payment on behalf of a payor to a payee and directing a debit in an amount associated with the payment request from an account associated with the payor at a first time. The systems and methods may further include determining a hold period based upon a risk analysis of the payor, and directing a credit in the amount of the payment to the payee a second time, where the hold period determines a time period between the first time and the second time.

Claims

1. A computer-implemented method, comprising:

Receiving, via a network, a payment request to make a payment on behalf of a payor to a payee;

directing a debit in an amount associated with the payment request from an account associated with the payor at a first time;

determining a hold period based upon a risk analysis of the payor; and

directing a credit in the amount of the payment to the payee a second time, wherein the hold period determines a time period between the first time and the second time.

2. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, further comprising:

securing funds from the debit at a third time.

3. The computer-implemented method of claim 2, wherein the third time is one of (i) subsequent to the second time such that the funds are secured after the credit has been directed, and (ii) prior to the second time such that the funds are secured before the credit has been directed.

4. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, wherein the hold period is determined to be zero, and the first time is substantially equal to the second time.

5. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, wherein the hold period is based upon the risk analysis of at least one of:

(i) an amount of payment, (ii) an identity of the payor, and (iii) payments previously executed on behalf of the payor.

6. The computer-implemented method of claim 5, wherein the risk analysis of the amount of payment includes comparing the amount of payment to at least one threshold.

7. The computer-implemented method of claim 5, wherein the risk analysis of the identity of the payor includes determining a creditworthiness of the payor.

8. The computer-implemented method of claim 5, wherein the risk analysis of payments previously executed includes comparing an aggregate amount of payments previously executed within an analyzed time period to at least one threshold.

9. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, wherein the credit is directed from an account associated with a service provider.

10. The computer-implemented method of claim 9, wherein the payee is not registered with the service provider or a sponsor associated with the service provider, and the credit is directed with a check or draft drawn from the account associated with the service provider.

11. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, further comprising:

prior to directing the credit, determining that the debit has not been returned uncollected within the hold period.

12. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, wherein the debit amount equals the amount associated with the payment request.

13. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, wherein the hold period is further determined based upon an analysis of at least one of (i) a default hold period and (ii) an identity of a sponsor associated with the payor.

14. A system, comprising:

a memory that stores programming instructions; and

a processor in communication with the memory, wherein the processor is configured to access the programming instructions to;

receive, via a network, a payment request to make a payment on behalf of a payor to a payee;

direct a debit in an amount associated with the payment request from an account associated with the payor at a first time;

determine a hold period based upon a risk analysis of the payor; and

direct a credit in the amount of the payment to the payee a second time, wherein the hold period determines a time period between the first time and the second time.

15. The system of claim 14, wherein the processor is configured to access the programming instructions to:

secure funds from the debit at a third time.

16. The system of claim 15, wherein the third time is one of (i) subsequent to the second time such that the funds are secured after the credit has been directed, and (ii) prior to the second time such that the funds are secured before the credit has been directed.

17. The system of claim 14, wherein the hold period is determined to be zero, and the first time is substantially equal to the second time.

18. The system of claim 14, wherein the hold period is based upon the risk analysis of at least one of:

(i) an amount of payment, (ii) an identity of the payor, and (iii) payments previously executed on behalf of the payor.

19. The system of claim 18, wherein the risk analysis of the amount of payment includes comparing the amount of payment to at least one threshold.

20. The system of claim 19, wherein the risk analysis of the identity of the payor includes determining a creditworthiness of the payor.

21. The system of claim 18, wherein the risk analysis of payments previously executed includes comparing an aggregate amount of payments previously executed within an analyzed time period to at least one threshold.

22. The system of claim 14, wherein the credit is directed from an account associated with a service provider.

23. The system of claim 22, wherein the payee is not registered with the service provider or a sponsor associated with the service provider, and the credit is directed with a check or draft drawn from the account associated with the service provider.

24. The system of claim 14, wherein the processor is further configured to access the programming instructions to:

prior to directing the credit, determine that the debit has not been returned uncollected within the hold period.

25. The system of claim 14, wherein the debit amount equals the amount associated with the payment request.

26. The system of claim 14, wherein the hold period is further determined based upon an analysis of at least one of (i) a default hold period and (ii) an identity of a sponsor associated with the payor.

27. A system, comprising:

means for receiving, via a network, a payment request to make a payment on behalf of a payor to a payee;

means for directing a debit in an amount associated with the payment request from an account associated with the payor at a first time;

means for determining a hold period based upon a risk analysis of the payor; and

means for directing a credit in the amount of the payment to the payee a second time, wherein the hold period determines a time period between the first time and the second time.