Email control system utilizing permissions for behavior determination

• US 20070233794A1
• Filed: 04/03/2006
• Published: 10/04/2007
• Est. Priority Date: 04/03/2006
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Sundeep Singh
• Original Assignee: Sundeep Singh
• Inventors: Singh, Sundeep
• Application Number:
  US11/396,861
• Publication Number:
  US 20070233794A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 709/206
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/107 Computer-aided management of electronic mailing [e-mailing]

Abstract

The present invention is an email control system that utilizes the concepts used in everyday client/server applications where permissions determine the behavior of such systems. Because current permissions strategies are too limiting and archaic in their intelligence and implementation, a new permissions system is to be developed that will use the current client/server applications system as an evolutionary step. The present invention teaches that there are basically three incarnations of the email permissions: Supplied—where specific permissions are supplied and are very precise in what actions are to be taken; Seek—in this case the email has a built in requirement to go out and seek permissions that may be held on a server somewhere and may in the meantime have changed a number of times—very much dependant on the whims of the sender; and Clarify—in this case permissions need clarification according to certain events that may or may not apply and therefore may seek supplied permissions or seek permissions.

Claims

1. A method of email control utilizing permissions for behavior determination consisting of:

three incarnations of the email permissions 102 for controlling email content transmission;

supplied, wherein specific permissions are supplied and are very precise in what actions are to be taken;

seek, wherein an email has a built in requirement to go out and seek permissions that may be held on a server somewhere and may in the meantime have changed a number of times and is dependant on the sender; and

clarify 105 wherein email permissions need clarification according to certain events that may or may not apply and therefore may seek supplied permissions or seek permissions.

2. The method of email control utilizing permissions for behavior determination of claim 1 wherein upon the receipt of email, either no permissions are set, permissions are provided, or permissions are actively sought.

3. The method of email control utilizing permissions for behavior determination of claim 2 wherein no permissions are set, email is available in all instances an control is as per normal operation known in the prior art.

4. The method of email control utilizing permissions for behavior determination of claim 2 wherein permissions are provided and arrive with the email.

5. The method of email control utilizing permissions for behavior determination of claim 4 wherein positive or negative permissions are defined.

6. The method of email control utilizing permissions for behavior determination of claim 2 wherein if permissions are actively sought, email is not to respond until permissions have been downloaded.

7. The method of email control utilizing permissions for behavior determination of claim 2 wherein permissions include, time, printability, basic permission to read, attachment control, number of views, and forward/copy functions.

8. The method of email control utilizing permissions for behavior determination of claim 2 further comprising a lifecycle setting that allows auto deletion after a certain time period whether the email has been read or not read.

9. The method of email control utilizing permissions for behavior determination of claim 2 wherein the permissions require an activity or other conditional event to occur after the email has been read.

10. The method of email control utilizing permissions for behavior determination of claim 1 which is delivered to a computer system via software patches, new clients, HTML/XML plug in, embedded, virus protection, and server compliance to actual email clients that includes a subset of the code or may be completely rewritten in order to incorporate these systems.

11. The method of email control utilizing permissions for behavior determination of claim 2 wherein to alleviate the need for a lengthy process for each email constructed, default permission levels are provided and can be defined by a user;

specific high priority permissions can be defined on a per email basis; and

separate permission sets can be defined for content and for inclusions.

12. The method of email control utilizing permissions for behavior determination of claim 11 wherein the specific event selection by recipients includes the ability to read, respond, forward, copy, save, execute, synch, move, view header information, modify status, permission manipulation, print, transfer, and specify file types.

13. The method of email control utilizing permissions for behavior determination of claim 11 wherein the single most important of these is the permission sets that define viewing of the email requiring that a email must be viewed while online and the permission is an actively sought permission.

14. The method of email control utilizing permissions for behavior determination of claim 2 wherein permissions can be defined in four areas of activity:

active, polled, user specific, and default.

15. The method of email control utilizing permissions for behavior determination of claim 14 wherein active permissions are set by the sender before the email has been sent and are projected along with the email when it is sent.

16. The method of email control utilizing permissions for behavior determination of claim 14 wherein

polled permissions are permissions that are not included with the email and are stored in a location external to the email, email recipient and email server;

said polled permissions give the sender the opportunity to modify permissions after sending and up to the point when the email is accessed. This would include when the email is pulled from the email server to an http interface or to a client.

17. The method of email control utilizing permissions for behavior determination of claim 14 wherein user specific permissions partly utilize the built in permissions engines in a preexisting applications.

18. The method of email control utilizing permissions for behavior determination of claim 14 wherein default permissions are set by the sender and do not have to be actively included in each email and are included automatically unless overridden by any of the other types of activity.

19. The method of email control utilizing permissions for behavior determination of claim 14 wherein each of said four areas of activity, active, polled, user specific, and default, can define permissions for five areas of definition, access, manipulation, storage, synch, and action reversal.

20. The method of email control utilizing permissions for behavior determination of claim 19 wherein

access is further comprised of:

time control requiring that any email not accessed within a certain time becomes inaccessible or polls for modification in content and inclusions;

content control requiring that depending on the content, specific permissions can be associated with the email;

domain control restricting the ability of anyone from allowing an email to be accessed outside of tightly defined set of systems within a network and therefore filtering out the content to external systems;

execute control that provides an email with executable inclusions defined by the permissions;

read control which makes the e-mail'"'"'s content unavailable even to the display device after a certain length of time or once focus moves from the application or when a confirmation of read has been actively processed by the recipient;

manipulation is further comprised of;

forward permissions that control of the ability of the recipient to forward email content and inclusions;

synchronization control allowing sender to very closely determine what happens to content and inclusions once viewed by recipient;

reply controls the ability of a recipient to reply;

copy control that the recipient must abide by the rules set out by the sender as to who can be included to receive the reply or who can be included in the forward;

save control determines where sensitive information be stored;

removal control restricts movement of the email content to different folders;

review header control enable the sender to limit or disallow viewing of header information; and

change status control locks permissions that have been set by the sender;

storage is further comprised of;

storage control which determines whether a copy of the email is left on the server or whether software is used to produce backup copies of emails can be controlled by the sender;

disk copy control either allows or disallows the coping of content or inclusions to a disk for storage; and

separation control that determines whether content and inclusions can be separated for storage;

synch is further comprised of;

target vetting;

type control for determining, by permissions, the type of synching allowed for the content or inclusions either separately or together; and

content inclusion for determining whether synching is allowed for time sensitive content inclusion i.e. content set to expire in a set amount of time;

action reversal is further comprised of;

check control that requires active polling of the permissions attributed to the content or inclusions that are polled before display or opening to confirm that permissions are still valid;

time related permissions that may change or may be requested for update should time have passed; and

permissions control that provides means for all permissions that can be requested for review by the recipient apart from viewing related permissions that may reverse the send of the email.