Reconfigurable non-pilot aircrew training system

• US 20070264617A1
• Filed: 05/12/2006
• Published: 11/15/2007
• Est. Priority Date: 05/12/2006
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: CAE Incorporated
• Original Assignee: CAE Incorporated
• Inventors: Richardson, Mark, Cutland, Paigc
• Application Number:
  US11/432,327
• Publication Number:
  US 20070264617A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 434/30
• CPC Class Codes: G09B 9/08 for teaching control of aircraft, e.g. Link trainer

Abstract

A reconfigurable non-pilot aircrew training system is provided. The system comprises an air-based system comprising a plurality of student workstations and at least one instructor workstation, wherein each workstations runs a simulation engine that controls models of different sensors/systems associated with a plurality of different aircraft in order to provide training simulations for different aircrew personnel classifications. Individual workstations can be grouped into “virtual crews” to train in a particular simulated exercise. State information blocks associated with each model allow for the configuration, monitoring and recording of simulations. A corresponding ground-based training system is also provided, which is adapted for debriefing of in-flight simulation data that was collected during training with the air-based system.

Claims

1. A reconfigurable aircrew training system comprising an air-based system comprising:

a plurality of student workstations and at least one instructor workstation;

an aircraft interface for interfacing with an aircraft training platform;

a network interconnecting the plurality of student workstations, the at least one instructor workstation and the aircraft interface;

wherein each student workstation is reconfigurable to A) simulate specific aircraft systems and sensors selected from a set of available systems and sensors and B) simulate training needs of a specific aircrew personnel classification selected from a set of available aircrew personnel classifications.

2. The system of claim 1 wherein each student workstation comprises:

a simulation engine;

a plurality of models running under control of the simulation engine;

a user interface.

3. The system of claim 2 wherein the plurality of models comprise at least one sensor or system model selected from a group consisting of:

Navigation, Communications, Data-link, Mission Management Systems, Radar, Electro-Optic/Infra-red (EO/IR) Sensors, Electronic Warfare (EW) systems, aircraft self-protection systems, Acoustic Sensors, Magnetic Anomaly Detection (MAD), and Weapons systems.

4. The system of claim 1 wherein the aircraft interface provides at least one of:

an interface for receiving power;

an interface for controlling live aircraft systems including at least one of radar, radios and navigation systems; and

an interface to a flight management system.

5. The system of claim 1 adapted to provide a blend of live and synthetic systems and sensors through an overlay presentation of live and synthetic information.

6. The system of claim 5 wherein the system is adapted to control the blend of live and synthetic systems and sensors for each student workstation individually.

7. The method of claim 1 wherein the set of aircrew personnel classifications comprise at least two selected from a group consisting of:

Navigator, Combat System Officer, Naval Flight Officer, Sensor Operator, Observer, Aircrewman, Sonarman, and Airborne Electronic Sensor Operator.

8. The system of claim 1 wherein a subset of sensors/systems that are to be learned by a given aircrew personnel classification is defined in a graduated fashion from a reduced subset to a full subset that the given aircrew personnel classification is assigned to learn.

9. The system of claim 1 wherein:

each student workstation comprises a user interface through which to receive student identification information from a student using the student workstation; and

the workstation is adapted to, upon receiving student identification information reconfigure itself for the aircrew classification associated with the received student identification information.

10. The system of claim 1 further comprising:

a mission recorder that records at least one of operator inputs, aircraft and synthetic entity movements, tactical plot info, synthetic information, and data received from aircraft systems.

11. The system of claim 2 further comprising at least one instructor workstation, wherein the simulation engine of each workstation is adapted to manage communication with the other workstations and is adapted to send and receive information to the aircraft interface.

12. The system of claim 2 wherein one of the models is a radar model provided as a separate executable application on a separate one of the plurality of processors of each student workstation;

one of the models is an EO/IR model provided as a separate executable application on another separate one of the plurality of processors of each student workstation, one of the models is an acoustics model provided as a separate executable application on yet another separate processor of the plurality of processors of each student workstation.

13. The system of claim 1 wherein radar information is provided to the student workstation using at least one of:

an onboard radar system that provides live radar information to the system through the aircraft interface;

an onboard radar system that provides live radar information in combination with superimposed synthetic targets and returns; and

an entirely synthetic radar system.

14. The system of claim 1 wherein a plurality of radar modes are simulated, and wherein a subset of the plurality of radar modes to be trained is selectable on a per-student basis.

15. The system of claim 1 adapted to selectably implement the following scenarios:

an individual workstation running a separate independent simulation with the possible exception of information coming from the aircraft interface in the event that those interfaces are active;

workstations grouped together into one or more groups of workstations each constituting a “

virtual crew”

;

with different crewmembers being assigned a respective aircrew personnel classification within a given virtual crew, such that activity by a model on one of the group of workstations will effect the corresponding models on the other workstations of the group.

16. The system of claim 15 wherein different mission scenarios and targets can be assigned to different workstations that may be operating independently or joined as part of the same virtual crew.

17. The system of claim 2 wherein:

for each workstation, each model generates a SIB (state information blocks) that is an update of information from that model that is shared with other models in that work station and with models on other workstations.

18. The system of claim 1 further comprising a ground-based system.

19. The system of claim 18 wherein a common software application is used in the air-based system and in the ground-based training system.

20. The system of claim 18 wherein the air-based system is further adapted to produce a simulation output that can be input to the ground-based system so that the simulations that were performed in an air environment can be examined in the ground-based system for debriefing purposes.

21. The system of claim 20 wherein after downloading the simulation output to the ground-based system, the ground-based system provides mission replay controls comprising fast forward, rewind and jump to bookmarks, and provides replay options comprising at least one of tactical plot information, operator selections, audio, synthetic entity and weather movement.

22. The system of claim 2 wherein each instructor workstation comprises an IOS (instructor operating system) that is a separate application that allows an instructor to communicate with students through the simulation engines, the IOS comprising interfaces and functionality for at least one of:

building virtual crew;

setting up scenarios and exercises;

modifying an exercise in real time;

adding new targets, adding weather or adding weapons fire;

selectively degrading or failing equipment;

controlling live vs. synthetic blend for at least one sensor/system; and

inserting “

bookmarks”

for event finding in debrief.

23. One or more computer readable media having computer executable instructions for implementing an aircrew training simulator when executed on a computer, the computer executable instructions comprising:

a simulation engine;

a plurality of models running under control of the simulation engine;

a user interface;

the aircrew training simulator being reconfigurable to A) simulate specific aircraft systems and sensors selected from a set of available systems and sensor and B) simulate training needs of a specific aircrew personnel classification selected from a set of available aircrew personnel classifications.

24. The computer readable media of claim 23 wherein the computer executable instructions further comprise:

an information sharing mechanism for sharing information with other workstations.

25. The computer readable media of claim 24 wherein the instructions further comprise:

instructions for implementing a plurality of state information blocks as a mechanism for sharing information with other workstations;

instructions for implementing at least one SIB interface, a SIB interface collecting information from an external device and composing it into a SIB for use by the simulator.