SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DETECTING A DISHONEST USER IN AN ONLINE RATING SYSTEM

• US 20070265803A1
• Filed: 05/10/2007
• Published: 11/15/2007
• Est. Priority Date: 05/11/2006
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Deutsche Telekom AG
• Original Assignee: Deutsche Telekom AG
• Inventors: Piratla, Nischal, Kotsovinos, Evangelos, Zerfos, Petros
• Application Number:
  US11/746,710
• Publication Number:
  US 20070265803A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 702/182
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 30/02 Marketing; Price estimation or determination; Fundraising

Abstract

A system and method for detecting a dishonest rater participating in a rating system is provided. Raters enter ratings regarding at least one entity which can be rated, and the ratings are stored. Individual values for the raters are calculated based on the ratings entered by the respective rater, and an indication value is determined based on the calculated individual values. The indication value is compared to a predetermined dishonesty threshold, and the rater is classified as dishonest based on the comparison result.

Claims

1. A method for detecting at least one dishonest rater in a rating system, the method comprising the steps of:

entering, by a plurality of raters, respective ratings with respect to at least one entity to be rated;

storing the entered respective ratings;

calculating a first individual value for a first rater of the plurality of raters based on the respective rating entered by the first rater;

calculating a second individual value for at least one second rater of the plurality of raters based on the respective rating entered by the at least one second rater;

determining an indication value for the first rater based on the calculated individual values, the indication value representing a degree of honesty of the first rater;

comparing the determined indication value to a predetermined dishonesty threshold; and

classifying the first rater as dishonest if the indication value is equal or higher than the predetermined dishonesty threshold.

2. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein the step of calculating a first individual value further comprises the steps of:

for each entity rated by the first rater, calculating a probability distribution for all ratings available for the respective entity; and

combining the calculated probability distributions to form the individual value with respect to the first rater.

3. The method as recited in claim 2, wherein the step of calculating a second individual value comprises the steps of:

for each entity rated by the at least one second rater, calculating a probability distribution for all ratings available for the respective entity; and

combining the calculated probability distributions to form the individual value with respect to the at least one second rater.

4. The method as recited in claim 2, further comprising the steps of:

determining a mean value of the calculated individual values; and

determining a standard deviation of the calculated individual values,

wherein the indication value for the first rater is determined depending on the individual value of the first rater, the mean value, and the standard deviation of the calculated individual values, and a total number of ratings entered by the first rater.

5. The method as recited in claim 3, further comprising the steps of:

determining a mean value of the calculated individual values; and

determining a standard deviation of the calculated individual values,

wherein the indication value for the first rater is determined depending on the individual value of the first rater, the mean value, and the standard deviation of the calculated individual values, and a total number of ratings entered by the first rater.

6. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein an individual value is calculated for each rater of the plurality of raters and wherein an indication value is determined for each rater of the plurality of raters.

7. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein the step of determining an indication value of the first or the at least one second rater is repeated if at least one further rating is entered by the first or the at least one second rater.

8. The method as recited in claim 7, further comprising the step of associating an identification code to each entered rating to detect the occurrence of a new rating.

9. The method as recited in claim 8, wherein the identification code comprises a timestamp.

10. The method as recited in claim 1, further comprising the step of:

dividing the plurality of raters into a plurality of groups of raters; and

associating each group of raters to a separate machine which determines and updates the indication value of each rater associated to it.

11. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein the step of classifying the first rater comprises classifying a rater into a predetermined category depending on the rater'"'"'s respective indication value.

12. The method as recited in claim 1, further comprising the step of:

querying, by the rating system, at least one parameter of a selected rater of the plurality of raters; and

determining whether to reward the selected rater for submitting a rating based on the queried parameter.

13. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein:

the indication value of the first rater is calculated and monitored in real time,

the first rater enters an adjustable probation period if the first indication value exceeds the dishonesty threshold, and

the first rater leaves the probation period if the indication value falls below the dishonesty threshold and remains there for the whole probation period.

14. A system for detecting at least one dishonest rater in a rating system, comprising:

a storage unit operable to store ratings which are entered into a rating system by a plurality of raters with respect to at least one entity to be rated;

a first calculation unit operable to calculate a first individual value for a first rater of the plurality of raters based on a rating entered by the first rater with respect to the at least one entity, the first calculation unit further operable to calculate a second individual value for at least one second rater of the plurality of raters based on a rating entered by the at least one second rater with respect to the at least one entity;

a determination unit operable to determine an indication value for the first rater based on the calculated individual values;

a comparison unit operable to compare the indication value to a predetermined dishonesty threshold; and

a classification unit operable to classify the first rater as dishonest if the indication value is equal or higher than the dishonesty threshold.

15. The system as recited in claim 14, wherein:

for each entity rated by the first rater, the first calculation unit is further operable to calculate a probability distribution for the ratings available for the respective entity, and is further operable to combine the calculated probability distributions to form the individual value with respect to the first rater.

16. The system as recited in claim 15, further comprising:

a second calculation unit operable to calculate a mean value and a standard deviation of the calculated individual values,

wherein the determination unit is further operable to determine the indication value for the first rater depending on the individual value of the first rater, the mean value and the standard deviation of the calculated individual values, and a total number of ratings entered by the first rater.

17. A system for detecting at least one dishonest rater in a rating system, comprising:

a master device;

at least one rating system;

a plurality of slave devices connected to the master device and to the at least one rating system;

the master device operable to assign a number of raters to each slave device of the plurality of slave devices;

each slave device comprising;

a storage unit operable to store ratings which are entered into the rating system by the raters assigned to the respective slave device;

a first calculation unit operable to calculate a respective individual value for at least a portion of the raters assigned to the respective slave device;

a determination unit operable to determine a respective indication value for at least a portion of the raters assigned to the respective slave device based on the calculated individual values;

a comparison unit operable to compare a respective indication value to a predetermined dishonesty threshold; and

a classification unit operable to classify a rater as dishonest if the respective indication value is equal or higher than the dishonesty threshold.

18. The system as recited in claim 17, wherein the master device comprises a second calculation unit operable to calculate a mean value and a standard deviation of all individual values calculated by the slave devices.

19. A computer-readable medium having a computer program stored thereon, the computer program configured to perform a method comprising the steps of:

storing a plurality of ratings entered by a plurality of raters with respect to at least one entity to be rated;

calculating a first individual value for a first rater of the plurality of raters based on the respective rating entered by the first rater;

calculating a second individual value for at least one second rater of the plurality of raters based on the respective rating entered by the at least one second rater;

determining an indication value for the first rater based on the calculated individual values, the indication value representing a degree of honesty of the first rater;

comparing the determined indication value to a predetermined dishonesty threshold; and

classifying the first rater as dishonest if the indication value is equal or higher than the predetermined dishonesty threshold.

20. The computer-readable medium as recited in claim 19, wherein the method performed by the computer program further comprises the steps of:

for each entity rated by the first rater, calculating a probability distribution for all ratings available for the respective entity;

combining the calculated probability distributions to form the individual value with respect to said first rater; and

repeating the steps of calculating a probability distribution and combining the calculated probability distributions for the at least one second rater.