Event coordination and evaluation system including compliance monitoring

• US 20070265902A1
• Filed: 01/05/2007
• Published: 11/15/2007
• Est. Priority Date: 01/06/2006
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Siteline Technology, LLC
• Original Assignee: Siteline Technology, LLC
• Inventors: Broadway, Eric, Brennen, Danamichele, Sivori, Jim, Truitt, Gregory, Tyndall, Paul
• Application Number:
  US11/650,242
• Publication Number:
  US 20070265902A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 705/8
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/06 Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/1095 Meeting or appointment

Abstract

Provided is a method and system for using a computer for event management and ensuring compliance with rules pertaining to events. The rules can include laws, regulations, and policies, and can be stored in a database for use by the system. A user interface is used for specifying event information such as event date and time, agenda, invitees, speakers, venue, A/V equipment, etc. The system can generate reports about the event, track and reconcile event costs, verify attendance, and monitor event parameters to ensure compliance with the rules. Also provided is a method and system for using a computer for historical event evaluation, and for generating recommendations for future events.

Claims

1. A method of using a computer system for event management and ensuring compliance with rules pertaining to an event, the method comprising:

providing in the computer system a rules database containing rules pertaining to the event;

specifying parameters of the event using the computer system; and

ensuring by the computer system that the event parameters conform to the rules.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the rules include at least one of:

one or more laws;

one or more regulations; and

one or more policies.

3. The method of claim 1, further comprising initiating the event using the computer system.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein the step of specifying event parameters comprises at least one of:

specifying at least one of event date, time, program type, topic, and agenda;

selecting at least one invitee;

selecting at least one speaker;

selecting at least one venue; and

specifying audio/visual equipment.

5. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

updating one or more rules in the rules database; and

ensuring by the computer system that the event parameters conform to the updated rules.

6. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

determining by the computer system projected event information based on the event parameters;

holding the event;

inputting actual event information into the computer system; and

reconciling by the computer system the actual event information with the projected event information.

7. The method of claim 6, wherein at least one of the determining projected event information step and the reconciling step also uses information of other events.

8. The method of claim 6, wherein:

the projected event information includes at least one of projected number of attendees, projected food cost per attendee, projected bar cost per attendee, projected venue charges, projected food total, projected food tax, projected bar total, projected bar tax, projected parking costs, projected audio-visual equipment costs, projected gratuity, and projected total cost of the event; and

the actual event information includes at least one of actual number of attendees, actual food cost per attendee, actual bar cost per attendee, actual venue charges, actual food total, actual food tax, actual bar total, actual bar tax, actual parking costs, actual audio-visual equipment costs, actual gratuity, and actual total cost of the event.

9. The method of claim 6, further comprising:

generating at least one of;

one or more prospective event reports indicative of projected event activities prior to completion of the event activities;

one or more actual event reports indicative of actual event activities following completion of the event activities; and

one or more variance reports indicative of the variance between projected event information and actual event information.

10. A computer readable medium having computer readable instructions to instruct a computer to perform a method for event management and ensuring compliance with applicable rules, the method comprising:

receiving parameters of a prospective event;

evaluating the event parameters using rules in a rules database; and

initiating at least one action based on the evaluation, to restrict a user action or notify a user of an evaluation result.

11. The computer readable medium of claim 10, wherein:

the evaluating step comprises determining if an event parameter or combination of parameters is at least one of;

not in compliance with one or more rules;

exceeds a selected threshold; and

within a selected range; and

the action in the initiating step comprises at least one of;

disallowing the selection of at least one event parameter;

displaying at least one message; and

sending at least one email.

12. The computer readable medium of claim 10, wherein the rules include at least one of:

one or more laws;

one or more regulations; and

one or more policies.

13. The computer readable medium of claim 10, wherein the method further comprises:

determining projected event information based on the event parameters;

receiving actual event information; and

reconciling the actual event information with the projected event information.

14. A computer system for event management and ensuring compliance with rules pertaining to an event, the system comprising:

a rules database containing rules pertaining to the event;

a user interface (UI) for specifying parameters of the event;

an event information database operatively associated with the UI for storing the event parameters; and

a processing module operatively associated with the rules database and the event information database for ensuring that the event parameters conform to the rules.

15. The computer system of claim 14, wherein the rules include at least one of:

one or more laws;

one or more regulations; and

one or more policies.

16. The computer system of claim 14, wherein the user interface is a graphical user interface (GUI).

17. The computer system of claim 14, wherein:

the processing module generates projected event information based on the event parameters;

the UI is used to input actual event information; and

the processing module reconciles the actual event information with the projected event information.

18. The computer system of claim 17, wherein:

the event information database stores historical event information; and

the processing module uses the historical event information for at least one of generating the projected event information and reconciling the actual event information and the projected event information.

19. The computer system of claim 17, wherein:

the projected event information includes at least one of projected number of attendees, projected food cost per attendee, projected bar cost per attendee, projected venue charges, projected food total, projected food tax, projected bar total, projected bar tax, projected parking costs, projected audio-visual equipment costs, projected gratuity, and projected total cost of the event; and

the actual event information includes at least one of actual number of attendees, actual food cost per attendee, actual bar cost per attendee, actual venue charges, actual food total, actual food tax, actual bar total, actual bar tax, actual parking costs, actual audio-visual equipment costs, actual gratuity, and actual total cost of the event.

20. The computer system of claim 14, wherein the event parameters comprise at least one of:

one or more of event date, time, program type, topic, and agenda;

information of at least one invitee;

information of at least one speaker;

information of at least one venue; and

information of audio/visual equipment.

21. The computer system of claim 17, wherein:

the processing module is for generating at least one of;

one or more prospective event reports indicative of projected event activities prior to completion of the event activities;

one or more actual event reports indicative of actual event activities following completion of the event activities; and

one or more variance reports indicative of the variance between projected event information and actual event information.

22. A method of using a computer system for historical event evaluation comprising:

providing in the computer system a rules database containing rules pertaining to events;

entering historical event information using the computer system; and

evaluating by the computer system the historical event information using the rules.

23. The method of claim 22, wherein the rules include at least one of:

one or more laws;

one or more regulations; and

one or more policies.

24. The method of claim 22 further comprising using the evaluated historical information to make recommendations for managing events.

25. The method of claim 22 further comprising analyzing by the computer system the historical event information.

26. The method of claim 25 further comprising using at least one of the evaluated and the analyzed historical information to make recommendations for managing events.

27. The method of claim 22, wherein:

the historical event information includes for one or more past events information of;

at least one of attendees, food cost, bar cost, venue charges, taxes, parking cost, audio-visual equipment cost, gratuity, and total event cost.

28. A computer readable medium having computer readable instructions to instruct a computer to perform a method for historical event evaluation, the method comprising:

receiving historical event information;

evaluating the historical event information using rules provided in a rules database; and

reporting the evaluation results.

29. The computer readable medium of claim 28, wherein the rules include at least one of:

one or more laws;

one or more regulations; and

one or more policies.

30. The computer readable medium of claim 28, wherein the method further comprises:

updating one or more rules in the rules database; and

evaluating the historical event information using the updated rules.

31. The computer readable medium of claim 28, wherein the method further comprises using the evaluated historical information to make recommendations for managing events.

32. The computer readable medium of claim 28, wherein the method further comprises analyzing the historical event information.

33. The computer readable medium of claim 32, wherein the method further comprises using at least one of the evaluated and the analyzed historical information to make recommendations for managing events.

34. The computer readable medium of claim 28, wherein:

the historical event information includes for one or more past events information of;

at least one of attendees, food cost, bar cost, venue charges, taxes, parking cost, audio-visual equipment cost, gratuity, and total event cost.

35. A computer system for historical event evaluation comprising:

a rules database containing rules pertaining to events;

an interface for inputting historical event information;

an event information database operatively associated with the interface for storing the historical event information; and

a processing module operatively associated with the rules database and the event information database for evaluating the historical event information using the rules.

36. The computer system of claim 35, wherein the rules include at lease one of:

one or more laws;

one or more regulations; and

one or more policies.

37. The computer system of claim 35, wherein the processing module uses the evaluated historical event information to make recommendations for managing events.

38. The computer system of claim 35, wherein the processing module analyzes the historical event information.

39. The computer system of claim 38, wherein the processing module uses at least one of the evaluated and the analyzed historical information to make recommendations for managing events.

40. The computer system of claim 35, wherein the historical event information includes for one or more past events information of:

at least one of attendees, food cost, bar cost, venue charges, taxes, parking cost, audio-visual equipment cost, gratuity, and total event cost.