Use of schedule editors in a network-based project schedule management system

• US 20070288288A1
• Filed: 06/07/2006
• Published: 12/13/2007
• Est. Priority Date: 06/07/2006
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Ricoh Company Limited
• Original Assignee: Ricoh Company Limited
• Inventors: Motoyama, Tetsuro, Fong, Avery
• Application Number:
  US11/449,116
• Publication Number:
  US 20070288288A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 705/9
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/06 Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/063118 Staff planning in a project environment
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/10 Office automation; Time management
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/1093 Calendar-based scheduling for persons or groups

Abstract

A system is used for the creation, maintenance, and management of an overall project schedule, of individual project member schedules, and of project task assignments over a network. The system comprises three editors accessed through a web browser to perform the various tasks by members of a project. Information is passed between a web server and web browser and a database is used to maintain all information. The project manager can use a task assignment editor to assign tasks to individual project members. The project manager can use a project schedule editor to initially create the project schedule and to show the overall project schedule. After the project schedule is created, each project member can create their own member schedule using a member schedule editor, containing tasks related to the project schedule. After project members complete a task, the project member updates the member'"'"'s schedule via the member schedule editor.

Claims

1. A computer-implemented method for managing a project schedule, the method comprising:

receiving from a user a request for a project schedule editor session, wherein the request identifies the user and a project and one particular project schedule editor from a group consisting of a task assignment editor, project schedule editor and member schedule editor;

in response to the request, querying a database to validate whether the user is a member of the project and to determine whether the user has access permission to the particular project schedule editor for the project;

if the user is not a member of the project or does not have access permission to the particular project schedule editor for the project or is not a member of the project and does not have access permission to the particular project schedule editor for the project, then denying the request;

if the user is a member of the project and has access permission to the particular project schedule editor for the project, then causing display of a page corresponding to the particular project schedule editor.

2. The method of claim 1, further comprising the steps of:

receiving, via a task assignment editor web page, one or more project tasks and assignment associations between particular subtasks and particular project members; and

in response to storing the associations and based at least in part on the stored associations, automatically generating a task assignment web page for displaying subtask assignments.

3. The method of claim 2, further comprising the step of:

displaying, in the task assignment web page, deleted project tasks.

4. The method of claim 2, further comprising the steps of:

receiving, via a project schedule editor web page, planned schedule dates for the project tasks and the particular subtasks; and

in response to storing the planned schedule dates for the project tasks and the particular subtasks and based at least in part on the planned schedule dates, automatically generating a project schedule web page for displaying a project schedule for the particular project.

5. The method of claim 4, further comprising the steps of:

displaying, in the task assignment editor web page, identifiers for the one or more project tasks and identifiers for the particular subtasks in association with identifiers for the corresponding particular project members to whom the particular subtasks are respectively assigned;

displaying, in the project schedule editor web page, identifiers for the particular subtasks in association with identifiers for the corresponding particular project members; and

displaying, in the project schedule web page, the planned schedule dates for the project tasks and for the particular subtasks in association with identifiers for the corresponding particular project members to whom the particular subtasks are respectively assigned.

6. The method of claim 4, further comprising the step of:

receiving, via the project schedule editor web page, an identifier of a new project task and corresponding planned schedule dates for the new project task.

7. The method of claim 4, further comprising the step of:

automatically aggregating subtask schedules for each project task in the project schedule editor.

8. The method of claim 7, wherein the step of aggregating subtask schedules is performed at a server processor.

9. The method of claim 4, further comprising the step of:

displaying, in the project schedule web page, obsolete schedule dates for one or more project tasks and subtasks.

10. The method of claim 9, wherein the step of displaying obsolete schedule dates includes displaying a strikethrough through an obsolete schedule date.

11. The method of claim 4, further comprising the steps of:

receiving, via a member schedule editor web page being used by a particular project member to whom a subset of the particular subtasks is assigned, schedule dates for the subset;

in response to storing the schedule dates for the subset of particular subtasks and based at least in part on the schedule dates for the subset, automatically generating a member schedule web page for displaying a member schedule for the particular project member to whom the subset is assigned; and

displaying the member schedule editor web page, wherein the member schedule editor web page displays only uncompleted subtasks and not completed subtasks.

12. The method of claim 11, further comprising the steps of:

receiving, via the member schedule editor web page, an identifier of a task that is unrelated to the particular project; and

displaying, in the member schedule web page, the identifier of the task that is unrelated to the particular project.

13. The method of claim 11, further comprising the steps of:

receiving, via the member schedule editor web page, an identifier of a lower level subtask that is a component of a first subtask from the subset of particular subtasks;

receiving, via the member schedule editor web page, schedule dates for the lower level subtask; and

updating, at a client processor, the schedule dates for the first subtask based on the schedule dates for the lower level subtask.

14. The method of claim 11, further comprising the step of:

displaying, in the member schedule web page, obsolete schedule dates for one or more subtasks.

15. The method of claim 14, wherein the step of displaying obsolete schedule dates includes displaying a strikethrough through an obsolete schedule date.

16. The method of claim 11, further comprising the step of:

displaying, in the member schedule web page, one or more completed subtasks.

17. A computer-readable storage medium carrying one or more sequences of instructions which, when executed by one or more processors, causes the one or more processors to perform the method recited in claim 1.

18. A computer-readable storage medium carrying one or more sequences of instructions which, when executed by one or more processors, causes the one or more processors to perform the method recited in claim 2.

19. A computer-readable storage medium carrying one or more sequences of instructions which, when executed by one or more processors, causes the one or more processors to perform the method recited in claim 3.

20. A computer-readable storage medium carrying one or more sequences of instructions which, when executed by one or more processors, causes the one or more processors to perform the method recited in claim 4.

21. A computer-readable storage medium carrying one or more sequences of instructions which, when executed by one or more processors, causes the one or more processors to perform the method recited in claim 5.

22. A computer-readable storage medium carrying one or more sequences of instructions which, when executed by one or more processors, causes the one or more processors to perform the method recited in claim 6.

23. A computer-readable storage medium carrying one or more sequences of instructions which, when executed by one or more processors, causes the one or more processors to perform the method recited in claim 7.

24. A computer-readable storage medium carrying one or more sequences of instructions which, when executed by one or more processors, causes the one or more processors to perform the method recited in claim 8.

25. A computer-readable storage medium carrying one or more sequences of instructions which, when executed by one or more processors, causes the one or more processors to perform the method recited in claim 9.

26. A computer-readable storage medium carrying one or more sequences of instructions which, when executed by one or more processors, causes the one or more processors to perform the method recited in claim 10.

27. A computer-readable storage medium carrying one or more sequences of instructions which, when executed by one or more processors, causes the one or more processors to perform the method recited in claim 11.

28. A computer-readable storage medium carrying one or more sequences of instructions which, when executed by one or more processors, causes the one or more processors to perform the method recited in claim 12.

29. A computer-readable storage medium carrying one or more sequences of instructions which, when executed by one or more processors, causes the one or more processors to perform the method recited in claim 13.

30. A computer-readable storage medium carrying one or more sequences of instructions which, when executed by one or more processors, causes the one or more processors to perform the method recited in claim 14.

31. A computer-readable storage medium carrying one or more sequences of instructions which, when executed by one or more processors, causes the one or more processors to perform the method recited in claim 15.

32. A computer-readable storage medium carrying one or more sequences of instructions which, when executed by one or more processors, causes the one or more processors to perform the method recited in claim 16.