Multi-User Multi-Input Application for Education

• US 20080003559A1
• Filed: 08/17/2006
• Published: 01/03/2008
• Est. Priority Date: 06/20/2006
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Microsoft Technology Licensing LLC (Microsoft Corporation)
• Original Assignee: Microsoft Corporation
• Inventors: Toyama, Kentaro, Pawar, Udai Singh
• Application Number:
  US11/465,221
• Publication Number:
  US 20080003559A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 434/350
• CPC Class Codes: G09B 7/02 of the type wherein the student is expected to construct an answer to the question which is presented or wherein the machine gives an answer to the question presented by a student

Abstract

A multi-user multi-input application for education is described. In one aspect, a user interface (UI) presenting pedagogical tasks of varied type and multiple cursors are presented on a single display. Each cursor is assigned to a particular user of multiple users. Actions associated with cursor control event data are mapped to particular users. Relative successes of respective ones of the users in completing particular types of pedagogical tasks of are determined.

Claims

1. A computer-implemented method comprising:

displaying, by a single display coupled to computing device, a user interface (UI) associated with one or more pedagogical tasks and multiple input controls, each input control for use by a respective user of multiple users to control at least a portion of the UI;

mapping actions associated with at least a subset of event data to one or more respective users of the multiple users, the event data being received from respective ones of the input controls; and

determining relative successes of at least a subset of the users in successful completion of the pedagogical tasks.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein a task of the pedagogical tasks is for independent, competitive, or collaborative efforts by at least a subset of the multiple users.

3. The method of claim 1, further comprising responsive to determining the relative successes, presenting one or more types of pedagogical tasks on the UI with increased or decreased frequency, the one or more types having been determined to be successfully or unsuccessfully completed by user(s) of the multiple users.

4. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

providing feedback to at least a subset of the multiple users, the feedback being based on the mapping; and

wherein the feedback comprises one or more of the following;

indicating that a user response to a task of the pedagogical tasks was correct, incorrect, or not a best response;

identifying an input control associated with successful completion of the task; and

assigning a certain number of points to user(s) that fully or partially completed the task.

5. The method of claim 1, further comprising, assigning at least input control of the multiple input controls to a group of the multiple users, the group comprising less than all of the multiple users.

6. The method of claim 1, further comprising, generating a report to evaluate progress of one or more users of the multiple users, the reports being based on at least a subset of the actions.

7. The method of claim 1, further comprising, determining progress of at least a subset of the multiple users based on actions mapped to respective ones of the at least a subset.

8. The method of claim 7, wherein determining the progress comprises one or more of tracking correct responses, logging incorrect responses, evaluating user participation in resolution of a task of the pedagogical tasks, correlating the user participation with performance on the task, and determining user intent.

9. The method of claim 1, further comprising dynamically changing the UI to provide one or more of additional competition, collaboration, and educational scenarios to respective one(s) of the multiple users, the changing being based on at least a subset of mapped ones of the actions that indicate competence of a user of the multiple users in completing a task of the pedagogical tasks.

10. The method of claim 9, wherein dynamically changing the UI comprises one or more of the following:

responsive to successful completion of a task of the pedagogical tasks by at least one user of the multiple users, allowing other users to successfully complete the task before introducing a next task;

changing UI object selection criteria for one or more of the multiple users;

presenting to one or more of the multiple users, based on one or more of user progress and predicted intent, a controlled spatial arrangement of pseudo-random content in the UI;

replaying a particular scenario associated with the task; and

wherein the task can be divided into sub-tasks;

assigning simple sub-tasks to user(s) of the multiple users that are not as successful in completing certain types of pedagogical task(s) as compared to other users of the multiple users; and

assigning complex sub-tasks to user(s) of the multiple users that are more successful in completing certain types of pedagogical task(s) as compared to other users of the multiple users.

11. The method of claim 1, further comprising analyzing logged activity of at least a subset of the multiple users to determine one or more of intensity of participation associated with a task of the pedagogical tasks and competency in the task.

12. The method of claim 11, wherein competency is based on one or more criteria comprising a number of correct solution(s), a number of incorrect response(s), amount(s) of time taken to complete the task, and a determination that a user is making random selections.

13. A computer-readable medium comprising computer-program instructions for a multi-user multi-input application for education, the computer-program instructions being executable by a processor on a single computing device to perform operations comprising:

receiving inputs from multiple input devices, the inputs for multiple users to independently interface with a UI presented on the single computing device; and

dynamically customizing an educational task presented by the UI based on inputs from at least a subset of the multiple users, the dynamically customizing being implemented with a change to one or more of dimension, position, and selection criteria of an object presented by the UI, the changing being based on an evaluation of success for a user with respect to one or more portions of the educational task.

14. The computer-readable medium of claim 13, wherein the UI object comprise a selection hotspot.

15. The computer-readable medium of claim 13, wherein the dynamically customizing further comprises not presenting a new educational task until each user has successfully completed a configurable portion of the educational task.

16. The computer-readable medium of claim 13, wherein the dynamically customizing further comprises spatially locating a correct response to the educational task in close proximity to a cursor associated with a user that is lagging behind other users interfacing with the educational task.

17. The computer-readable medium of claim 13, wherein the operations further comprise presenting personalized online and off-line feedback for evaluation, the feedback being based on independent and collaborative interaction with the educational task by the multiple users.

18. A computing device comprising:

a processor; and

a memory coupled to the processor, the memory comprising computer-program instructions executable by the processor to perform operations comprising;

receiving pointing device input from multiple users, each user being associated with a particular one pointing device;

correlating the pointing device input to associated ones of the multiple users;

responsive to correlating the pointing device input, determining respective user participation with a UI of a collaborative educational computer program that is executing on the computing device, the UI being presented in a single main UI window by a single display device operatively coupled to the computing device, the collaborative educational computer program being configured to allow each user to provide independent input to at least a portion of UI object(s) presented in the main UI window; and

dynamically changing particular aspects of educational scenarios provided by the collaborative educational computer program for a subset of the multiple users, the particular aspects being based on determining the respective user participation.

19. The computing device of claim 18, wherein the particular aspects determine whether the educational scenario is more competitive, collaborative, or independent for respective ones of the subset of users based on corresponding determinations of participation of each user in the subset of users.

20. The computing device of claim 18, further comprising providing feedback to at least a subset of the multiple users, the feedback flashing a color or changing a size of a cursor control corresponding to a user of the multiple users that provided a correct response to a presented task.