METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR IMPROVED MANUFACTURING OF COLOR FILTERS

• US 20080024552A1
• Filed: 07/27/2007
• Published: 01/31/2008
• Est. Priority Date: 07/28/2006
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Applied Materials Incorporated
• Original Assignee: Applied Materials Incorporated
• Inventors: WHITE, John, SHANG, Quanyuan
• Application Number:
  US11/829,494
• Publication Number:
  US 20080024552A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 347/41
• CPC Class Codes: B41J 2/2128 by means of energy modulation control methods or devices therefor, e.g. driver circuits or control circuits B41J2/04501
• CPC Class Codes: B41J 25/003 for changing the angle between a print element array axis and the printing line, e.g. for dot density changes
• CPC Class Codes: G02B 5/201 in the form of arrays

Abstract

Methods and apparatus are provided in which a substrate is aligned so that a longitudinal dimension of a plurality of sub-pixel wells formed on the substrate are substantially perpendicular to a printing direction. Ink is deposited in a subset of the sub-pixel wells via nozzles of a print head wherein each of a plurality of the nozzles deposits a plurality of ink drops in each of the subset of the sub-pixel wells. Numerous other aspects are disclosed.

Claims

1. A method comprising:

aligning a substrate on an inkjet printing system so that a longitudinal dimension of at least one sub-pixel well on the substrate is substantially perpendicular to a printing direction of the inkjet printing system; and

depositing a plurality of ink drops in the sub-pixel well using a print head having a plurality of nozzles wherein at least two of the nozzles each deposit at least two ink drops in the sub-pixel well.

2. The method of claim 1 further comprising aligning the print head at an angle relative to the print direction so that a potential number of drops to be deposited in the sub-pixel well equals an integer multiple of a number of nozzles that will pass over the sub-pixel well.

3. The method of claim 1 further comprising depositing additional pluralities of ink drops in other sub-pixel wells on the substrate wherein the sub-pixel wells are arranged in multiple rows and the depositing additional pluralities of ink drops is into every third row of sub-pixel wells.

4. The method of claim 1 wherein a number of nozzles required to span the sub-pixel may be determined by solving an equation for N where the equation is expressed as:

$\mathrm{COS}<br><br>\left(\mathrm{\Theta <br><br>}\right)=\frac{P}{N⨯<br><br>\mathrm{\rho <br><br>}}$

where θ

represents a saber angle, P represents a longitudinal dimension of the sub-pixel well, n represents the number of nozzles required to span the sub-pixel, and ρ

represents a nozzle pitch.

5. The method of claim 1 further comprising moving the substrate in the printing direction while depositing the plurality of ink drops, and

wherein the nozzles deposit ink drops in turn as the pixel well passes under the nozzles.

6. The method of claim 1 further comprising varying a size of the ink drops deposited by a given nozzle.

7. A method comprising:

aligning a substrate so that a longitudinal dimension of a plurality of sub-pixel wells formed on the substrate are substantially perpendicular to a printing direction; and

depositing ink in a subset of the sub-pixel wells via nozzles of a print head wherein each of a plurality of the nozzles deposits a plurality of ink drops in each of the subset of the sub-pixel wells.

8. An apparatus comprising:

a stage adapted to align a substrate; and

a print head including a plurality of nozzles and being adapted to deposit ink drops into pixel wells on the substrate,

wherein the apparatus is operative to;

align the substrate on the stage so that a longitudinal dimension of a plurality of sub-pixel wells formed on the substrate are substantially perpendicular to a printing direction; and

deposit ink in a subset of the sub-pixel wells via the nozzles wherein each of the nozzles deposits a plurality of ink drops in each of the subset of the sub-pixel wells.

9. The apparatus of claim 8 wherein the apparatus is further operative to align the print head at an angle relative to the print direction so that a potential number of drops to be deposited in each sub-pixel well equals an integer multiple of a number of nozzles that will pass over each sub-pixel well.

10. The apparatus of claim 8 wherein the apparatus is further operative to deposit additional pluralities of ink drops in other sub-pixel wells on the substrate wherein the sub-pixel wells are arranged in multiple rows and the depositing additional pluralities of ink drops is into every third row of sub-pixel wells.

11. The apparatus of claim 8 wherein a number of nozzles required to span a sub-pixel may be determined by solving an equation for N where the equation is expressed as:

$\mathrm{COS}<br><br>\left(\mathrm{\Theta <br><br>}\right)=\frac{P}{N⨯<br><br>\mathrm{\rho <br><br>}}$

where θ

represents a saber angle, P represents a longitudinal dimension of the sub-pixel well, N represents the number of nozzles required to span the sub-pixel, and ρ

represents a nozzle pitch.

12. The apparatus of claim 8 wherein the apparatus is further operative to move the substrate in the printing direction while depositing the plurality of ink drops, and

wherein the nozzles deposit ink drops in turn as the pixel well passes under the nozzles.

13. The apparatus of claim 8 wherein the apparatus is further operative to vary a size of the ink drops deposited by a given nozzle.

14. A system for inkjet printing comprising:

a stage adapted to align a substrate;

a print bridge spanning across the stage;

a plurality of print heads supported by the print bridge, each print head including a plurality of nozzles and being adapted to deposit ink drops into pixel wells on the substrate,

wherein the system is operative to;

align the substrate on the stage so that a longitudinal dimension of a plurality of sub-pixel wells formed on the substrate are substantially perpendicular to a printing direction; and

deposit ink in a subset of the sub-pixel wells via the nozzles wherein each of the nozzles deposits a plurality of ink drops in each of the subset of the sub-pixel wells.

15. The system of claim 14 wherein the system is further operative to align the print head at an angle relative to the print direction so that a potential number of drops to be deposited in each sub-pixel well equals an integer multiple of a number of nozzles that will pass over each sub-pixel well.

16. The system of claim 14 wherein the system is further operative to deposit additional pluralities of ink drops in other sub-pixel wells on the substrate wherein the sub-pixel wells are arranged in multiple rows and the depositing additional pluralities of ink drops is into every third row of sub-pixel wells.

17. The system of claim 14 wherein a number of nozzles required to span a sub-pixel may be determined by solving an equation for N where the equation is expressed as:

$\mathrm{COS}<br><br>\left(\mathrm{\Theta <br><br>}\right)=\frac{P}{N⨯<br><br>\mathrm{\rho <br><br>}}$

where θ

represents a saber angle, P represents a longitudinal dimension of the sub-pixel well, N represents the number of nozzles required to span the sub-pixel, and ρ

represents a nozzle pitch.

18. The system of claim 14 wherein the system is further operative to move the substrate in the printing direction while depositing the plurality of ink drops, and

wherein the nozzles deposit ink drops in turn as the pixel well passes under the nozzles.

19. The system of claim 14 wherein the system is further operative to vary a size of the ink drops deposited by a given nozzle.

20. The system of claim 14 wherein a mura irregularity is avoided by printing more than one drop in each sub-pixel well using different inkjet nozzles.