System and method for creating cheap efficient high-speed home networks.

• US 20080025723A1
• Filed: 04/23/2007
• Published: 01/31/2008
• Est. Priority Date: 04/21/2006
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Haim Gadassi, Yaron Mayer
• Original Assignee: Haim Gadassi, Yaron Mayer
• Inventors: Mayer, Yaron, Gadassi, Haim
• Application Number:
  US11/739,001
• Publication Number:
  US 20080025723A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 398/58
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 12/2838 Distribution of signals within a home automation network, e.g. involving splitting/multiplexing signals to/from different paths adaptations of television systems for transmission by electric cable for domestic distribution H04N7/106; hybrid transport H04L12/6418; home network arrangements specially adapted for distribution of digital video signals H04N7/24
• CPC Class Codes: H04M 11/062 using different frequency bands for speech and other data

Abstract

Broadband connections of end users to the Internet are becoming more and more common today, and the most common types of these fast connections are ADSL and Cable modems. These connections are typically still very slow compared to the speeds that are expected in the next few years and typically also highly asymmetric and allow typically 750-2000 Kbit per second (most typically 1500 Kbit) for the downlink and typically for example 96 Kbit or 128 Kbit per second for the uplink (although standard ADSL can in principle support up to 8 Mbit per second download speed and up to 800 Kbit per second upload speed), based on the assumption that most users download much more data than they upload. However, for many users these limitations are highly undesirable, and these are for example home users or small businesses or organizations who want to use the connection also for example for VOIP (voice over IP) communications and/or Video-over IP communications and/or conferences and/or for example running web servers and/or for example various p2p applications, and in fact the low uplink also many times slows down the downlink due to the overhead needed for dealing with relatively small packets, so that any additional uplink by the user can severely limit the real downlink that can be achieved below the downlink bandwidth which the user is paying for. Actually ADSL is beginning to be replaced in some places by VDSL where the distance to the nearest street switchboard is about 1.2 Kilometers or less, which in principle allows up to 52 Mbit per second Download speed and up to 16 Mbit per Second Upload speed. However, these modems are expensive and are only slowly entering the market and only in a few countries. On the other hand there is no need to upgrade typical cable modems for enabling faster speeds, such as for example 20 Mbit downlink and 2 Mbit uplink, as is offered for example in France, when the ISPs start offering such speeds—since the typical common cable modem is already capable of such speeds. The present invention enables an improved Ethernet-over-coax solution which enables using one or a few very high speed modems, each for multiple users or apartments, preferably in combination with very cheap and very fast home networks (offering preferably at least up to 100 Mbit per second for each computer, preferably at full duplex), preferably based on the Cable TV coax cables, so that multiple computers can share the same internet connection for example in the same apartment and/or communicate between themselves. This preferably includes using a different frequency for the Ethernet-over coax channel for each computer in the apartment. Also shown are for example improved home networks using the second set of normally unused 2 phone wires and for example some improvement in HPNA networks, such as for example using HPNA also to connect between the street switchboard and the home or office instead of having to use also for example an ADSL or VDSL modem.

Claims

1. A system of improved computer networking comprising at least one of:

a. An Ethernet over coax system, comprising at least one Coax cable, at least two Ethernet sockets, Filters coupled to each Ethernet socket for shifting up the normal Ethernet frequency in order to send it as data over the Coax and shifting down data received over the coax back into the normal Ethernet frequency, and at least one of;

1. Means for using more than one frequency channel for carrying frequency-shifted Ethernet communications over the Coax, and 2. A home computer network based on Ethernet over Coax, wherein more than one computer shares a modem or optical end unit other internet connection device which is in the apartment though said network;

b. A computer network wherein the normally unused 2 wires in phone cables within houses and/or offices are used for creating cheap home computer networks in existing houses and/or offices;

c. A system of networking wherein at least in installations in new buildings and/or new installations in existing buildings a street switchboard is connected to buildings and/or to the apartments or houses with one or more coax cables and/or one or more Ethernet cables instead of normal phone line cables, and/or phone cables and/or coax cables and/or Ethernet cables are used which come with an additional one or more optic fibers combined in the same cable, and/or through wireless communication which is transferred on existing coax cable, and/or by HPNA or similar technologies over phone line.

2. The system of claim 1 wherein at least one of the following features exists:

a. The Frequency up-shifter shifts Ethernet communications to above the frequency range used by the Cable TV network;

b. There are one or more shared routers and/or hubs at the building which are coupled to at least one high bandwidth modem or optical end unit or other high bandwidth internet connection device and communicate with multiple apartments;

c. There is at least one coax cable per apartment;

d. The shared building router and/or hub takes care of implementing the separate frequency channels by using frequency shifters for each of the needed frequencies.

3. The system of claim 2 wherein at least one of the following features exists:

a. There is such a router and/or hub in each apartment, and all the communications between computers connected to the Ethernet sockets go through this router;

b. Two or more computers in the same apartment can share the same Internet connection and/or can communicated data between themselves;

c. Two or more computers in the same apartment can share the same Internet connection and/or can communicated data between themselves at full Ethernet speeds;

d. There can be one or more end sockets in each room and/or at least one of the socket boxes contain more than one Ethernet end-socket.

4. The system of claim 1 wherein at least one of the following features exists:

a. If more end sockets than the available number of separate frequency channels are needed in a single apartment then more than one coax cable is connected to that apartment, or some of the end devices share the same frequency;

b. The users can also add a socket splitter where needed, which plugs into an end node Ethernet socket and converts it into two sockets, using the same frequency, or the additional socket can create an additional shift in the frequency, thus actually becoming a socket of a different frequency;

c. At least some sockets have a dynamically selectable frequency;

d. At least some sockets have a dynamically selectable frequency by using a crystal which can electronically be made to change its frequency;

e. The system allows up to 100 Mbit in full-duplex by using differentiation calculation of the voltages, in order to enable signals to be sent in both directions at the same time.

5. The system of claim 1 wherein at least one of the following features exists:

a. If one or more shared multi-apartment routers and/or hubs are used in the building then filters and/or multiplexers are added to create a separate coax link for each apartment without cross talks between the apartments;

b. If the solution is implemented as a separate home-network without the shared router at the building, then a filter is added for each apartment;

c. The same coax cable is shared between all the rooms of the apartment;

d. Each room (or at least some of the rooms) have a separate coax cable so that the coax cables of different rooms all connect to the central hub or router.

6. The system of claim 1 wherein at least one of the following features exists:

a. If the solution is implemented as a separate home-network without the shared router at the building, the network uses a hub or router, which is coupled to the Internet modem or a modem is used which contains the router and/or hub within it, or the network is configured so that one of the computers acts as a server;

b. If multiple frequencies are used then if a server is used instead of the router then a separate Ethernet card is added to the server for each frequency, and the Ethernet cards are improved so that a single card can have more than one sockets;

c. If the multiple frequencies are used together with a router in the apartment, the router/hub has sufficient sockets, one for each frequency;

d. If the multiple frequencies are used together with a router in the apartment, the router connects with the filters directly to the Coax cable.

7. The system of claim 1 wherein at least one of the following features exists:

a. The different frequency sockets are sold in different colors, each color for a different frequency, or all sockets are white or similar colors or other common colors and the frequency is marked by a smaller color spot and/or for by other markings and/or by numbers;

b. If some people still prefer the single frequency solution in order to save some installation costs, then different frequencies are distributed to different users, so that if afterwards they decide to upgrade, they can return some of their single frequency sockets and get instead sockets with different frequencies;

c. When the integrated building solution is applied (i.e. the solution with one or more routers which each handle multiple apartments), all the apartments receive the multi-frequency solution, since the cost for the router is already included;

d. When installing an independent home network without the integrated building solution, the installation can either be done by sending a technician to the apartment, which is typically needed anyway if additional coax endpoints need to be added, or the users can install it themselves, especially if there are already sufficient coax TV socket end points.

8. The system of claim 1 wherein at least one of the following features exists:

a. The end sockets are designed in one or more sizes which fit the typical size of most coax end sockets, so that the additional Ethernet socket does not increase the size of the plastic cover of the socket;

b. The improved sockets which include also the Ethernet socket are installed by removing the exiting TV socket and replacing it;

c. The improved sockets which include also the Ethernet socket are installed by adding an element which connects to the given TV and/or radio socket so that only the plastic cover needs to be replaced;

d. The improved sockets which include also the Ethernet socket are installed by plugging a device over the existing TV socket without even having to open its plastic cover.

9. The system of claim 1 wherein at least one of the following features exists:

a. For power supply the frequency up-shifter and down-shifter get their electrical power from the coax cable itself;

b. For power supply the frequency up-shifter and down-shifter get their electrical power from the coax cable itself by adding a DC with a low voltage to the coax cable;

c. If it is a standalone home network then the additional DC is added from a transformer connected to the wall near one of the endpoints so that the DC is carried over also to all the other endpoints by the coax cable;

d. In the integrated building solution the DC is added by a device near the shared router or routers.

10. The system claim 1 wherein at least one of the following features exists:

a. If the users want to be able to use at least one mobile computer in the house, then they can plug into one or more of the end sockets a device which translates the Ethernet communication to wireless communication;

b. Said wireless communication is done by optic wireless communications or by using UWB;

c. If the home network is used without the shared building router and modem then a filter (or filters) is added which prevents the DC current and the frequencies of above the normal cable TV broadcasts from going outside the apartment;

d. If the integrated building solution is used, then filters are added between the system at the bottom of the building and the coax cable that enters the building to prevents the DC current and the frequencies of above the normal cable TV broadcasts from going outside the building.

11. The system of claim 1 wherein at least one of the following features exists:

a. An additional router in the apartment is used even in the integrated building solution, so that packets communicating between computers within the apartment don'"'"'t leave the apartment;

b. An additional router in the apartment is used even in the integrated building solution, and the filter of signals above the Cable TV broadcasts is also added between the apartment and the rest of the building, and on both sides of this router separate up-shifters and down-shifters are used for each side of the coax cable;

c. Data encryption is automatically added for when computers in the apartments communicate which each other, so that the shared building router can also be used for this communication without the need to add the additional router inside the apartment;

d. If there are additional buildings which share the same coax cable to the Cable company'"'"'s optical end node, each the modems of the sharing buildings use time sharing over the shared coax or use separate frequencies, and/or the shared building modem can go up to higher speeds and the sharing between the buildings is based on the TCP/IP packet switching at least for the down-link, so that when some buildings use less than their maximum allowed share other buildings can reach even higher speeds, or the sharing for the down link is based on sending the same data to all the modems which are sharing the same coax cable like in individual Cable TV modems;

e. If even higher speeds than 100 Mbps per computer are covered and the computers use Ethernet cards of more than 100 Mbps, the up-shifters and down-shifters are improved for sending more data on the same bandwidth by using additional parameters for encoding the data;

f. If even higher speeds than 100 Mbps per computer are used, in order to save costs the up-shifters and down-shifters are designed so that they don'"'"'t themselves have to do the actual encoding with additional parameters but keep the existing additional encoding used by the faster Ethernet cards, or keep some of the additional encoding and add some;

g. In buildings in which the currently existing Coax cable configuration is so that the same coax cable is shared between apartments on each floor, additional coax cables are added so that each apartment has at least one separate coax cable from the building coax switchboard;

h. In buildings in which the currently existing Coax cable configuration is so that the same coax cable is shared between apartments on each floor, the coax cable is changed to more expensive cable capable of working for at higher Gbps, so that no or only a few additional coax cables need to be added, and in this case additional frequency down-shifters and up-shifters are used so that more frequency channels are available on each coax cable that goes through the stairway;

i. In buildings in which the currently existing Coax cable configuration is so that the same coax cable is shared between apartments on each floor, optic fibers are added to each apartment from the shared building unit, and then the optic end node at the entrance to the apartment is shared between computers within the apartment through the cheap coax home network;

13. The system of claim 1 wherein at least one of the following features exists:

a. The ISP supplies individual apartments with a Cable modem which uses 512 QAM or higher and/or the shared building modem or modems use 512 QAM or higher;

b. For HDTV VOD there is part of the bandwidth which is logically assigned as higher priority for it, which means that such packets have higher priority than other Internet data packets until the maximum allotted bandwidth for this is reached;

c. The HDTV with VOD and/or in normal broadcasts is broadcast with Mpeg 4 compression or similar compressions so that it does not take much more bandwidth than current normal resolution broadcasts which use Mpeg2;

d. The shared building router or routers can be programmed from afar by the ISP, so that users can dynamically change internet definitions without need for hardware configuration changes in the apartment or in the building, so that the users in some apartment can dynamically change the sharing relations between computers in the apartment, and/or dynamically change the uplink and/or downlink definitions of each Internet connection;

e. These shared routers of the buildings can also be used for communicating directly with the electricity meters and/or water meters of apartments so that the electricity company or the water authorities can use remote readings instead of having to send someone once in a while to read the meters manually.

14. The system of claim 1 wherein there are only one or a few shared set-top boxes at the buildings to which TV sets in the apartments are connected, and TVs in apartments are only connected to a cheaper limited set-top box who'"'"'s main feature is communicating with the real shared set-top box or boxes of the building, and wherein at least one of the following features exists:

a. Said shared building set-top box decodes simultaneously all the relevant channels, by using multiple decoders and/or a much stronger CPU or CPUs and/or DSP or DSPs than an ordinary set-top-box which can decode dozens of channels at the same time, and sends this data together to all the users who are watching the same channel at the same time;

b. Since typically many people watch the same most popular channels, and some channels are almost never watched, sufficient channels are covered so that at least most of the time that some user jumps to a channel it will be a channel which is already currently being decoded by the shared super-set top box because at least one other neighbor is already watching it or has been watching it and hasn'"'"'t yet switch to another channel;

c. If there are still available decoding resources a channel continues to be decoded even if the neighbor who was watching it has switched the TV off without changing the channel;

d. This can also be used for instant zapping, so that only if the next channel that a user zaps to is not covered then the shared set-box has to start covering it, and if the channel is already covered the user can start seeing the newly chosen channel instantly;

e. For instant zapping the shared set-top box creates for the user who just zapped into this channel a new base frame from the current logical frame which is currently being transmitted to the other neighbors who are currently watching the show, and continues to encode the new changes to it until the next shared base-frame is reached, and from that point that user can share the same original bit stream which the other neighbors are sharing;

f. Each of the covered channels is transmitted from the shared set-top box to the TV end nodes which are watching it without mpeg compression, so that every frame is a base frame;

g. Since some channels might be available only to user who paid specifically for them the limited set-top-box at each end node also takes care of the permissions management when communicating with the shared set-top-box;

h. The set-top-box of each apartment can also sense if the connected TV has been turned off, so that if more separate channels need to be covered the shared set-top box knows that is can discard first of all channels which are being broadcast to TVs which have actually been turned off;

i. The shared set-top also uses heuristic predictions of the next-channel or channels which the user is about to zap to, and the shared set-top box starts decoding the next predicted channel (or channels) if it is not being decode already and there are sufficient available decoding resources for decoding it.

15. The system of claim 1 wherein at least one of the following features exists:

a. In case of independent houses instead of apartment buildings similar solutions are used, except that instead of a central router or routers at the bottom of the building this sharing is done in street boxes or cabinets, each servicing multiple housed around it;

b. Similar solutions can be used also if the users or some of them are satellite subscribers, since in case of satellite broadcasts typically similar coax cables are used, however, if the satellite coax cables transmit the TV broadcasts at a different frequency range, different frequency shifters are used in this case for the Ethernet channels, or the Satellite down-shifters are changed to use frequencies like the cable signals;

c. In apartments that are not subscribers of Cable TV or satellite TV and want to connect to the Internet this way, the coax cable is added during the installation, and in this case more Ethernet frequencies are available for such apartments since the up-shifters can use also the frequency range which is normally used for the cable TV broadcasts.

16. The system of claim 1 wherein at least one of the following features exists:

a. The Cable TV and/or satellite TV suppliers transmit their TV programs and/or HTDV and/or VOD by pulses or modulated pulses and/or UWB over coax and/or use QAM so that broadcasts become much more efficient and for need less bandwidth on the coax, thus leaving more room for the Internet bandwidth;

b. The Cable TV and/or satellite TV suppliers transmit their TV programs and/or HTDV and/or VOD to the home together with the Internet access directly on fiber to the home when FTTH becomes available, so that the coax is not needed at all;

c. The Cable TV and/or satellite TV suppliers transmit their TV programs and/or HTDV and/or VOD to the home together with the Internet access directly on fiber to the home or to the building, and both the set-top-box and the computers connect to the Internet through the same optic fiber modem in the apartment or shared optic fiber modem in the building, and/or there is no set top box and one of the computers acts also as set-top box.

17. The system of claim 1 wherein the normally unused 2 wires in phone cables within houses and/or offices are used for creating cheap home computer networks in existing houses and/or offices, and at least one of the following features exists:

a. At needed connection points an additional female phone jack is added on the wall with the other 2 wires connected to so that it connects to an adapter which has on one end a normal phone male connector and on the other hand a normal male Ethernet connector, so that the male Ethernet connector can be inserted into an additional Ethernet card in the main computer that is connected to the Web or into a hub or router through which more than one computer can connect to the web, so that the Ethernet card or router with Ethernet connectors can automatically adjust to using only 2 wires instead of 8 by reducing the speed accordingly;

b. If 2 or more phone lines are available, additional sets of the 2 unused wires can preferably be used with the same connector, so that the same connector can be used with up to 8 wires at least at the Ethernet side;

c. Improved HPNA adapters are used which can take advantage also of the additional 2 wires of each available phone line and/or also of additional lines or wires;

19. The system of claim 17 wherein at least one of the following features exists:

a. The Building network can be done at least partially by using HPNA over Coax and/or by using HPNA over existing phone lines;

b. The existing phone lines and outlets and/or similarly existing coax lines and their outlets can also be used as additional power outlets for low-wattage devices, by adding at one or more points in the apartment or office a transformer that brings electricity from the electric power grid to one or more existing phone lines or coax lines which are already installed in the walls;

c. One or more filters that prevent the extra power from existing the office or the apartment are added and appropriate electrical outlets near relevant phone or coax outlets are added.

20. The system of claim 1 wherein at least in installations in new buildings and/or new installations in existing buildings a street switchboard is connected to buildings and/or to the apartments or houses with one or more coax cables and/or one or more Ethernet cables instead of normal phone line cables, and/or phone cables and/or coax cables and/or Ethernet cables are used which come with an additional one or more optic fibers combined in the same cable, and/or through wireless communication which is transferred on existing coax cable, and/or by HPNA or similar technologies over phone line, and at least one of the following features exists:

a. Two of the wires of the Ethernet cable are used for phone conversations and the others are additional lines available for data transfer;

b. A coax cable is used and voice data is transmitted over it by upshifters and downshifters like for the other data, and/or the Ethernet over Coax switchboard is built at the street switchboard for of or in addition to doing it at the building, so that no modem is needed in the house or apartment;

c. An Ethernet cable is used from the street to the house or apartment and VOIP over the Ethernet connection is used for voice data at least between the home and the street switchboard;

d. An Ethernet cable is used and the connection between the apartment and the street switchboard is made by HPNA;

e. A special Ethernet cable is used which contains more wires, so that sufficient wires can be used for Ethernet communication and separate wires can be used for normal phone line, and/or additional wires are used in the cable for supplying electricity for supplying power to various end gadgets of low power consumption in the house;

f. The street switchboard contains one or more Ethernet hubs which are connected to the apartment or house with an Ethernet cable, and the same cable is used also within the house to create a home network so that more than one computer in the house can share the same connection;

g. Phone cables and/or coax cables and/or Ethernet cables are used which come with an additional one or more optic fibers combined in the same cable;

h. Improved Ethernet cables are used that can be used on larger distance by combing principles of Coax and Ethernet cables and/or using a combination of HPNA and Ethernet and/or other improved protocols;

i. The Coax cable and/or Ethernet cable and/or cable which includes also one or more optic fibers within it is not considerably larger in diameter than a normal phone line cable, so it does not require wider canals than the ones used for inserting normal phone lines, and/or even existing phone lines can be pulled out of their canal and the above described cable can be inserted in the same canal in its place;

j. If one or more optic fibers are integrated in the cable, the optic fibers are integrated with sufficient slack flexibility, so that bending the cable does not create tearing stress on the optic fiber or fibers, and/or pulling the cable does not create stress for the optic fiber or fibers since the metal wires have less slack freedom than the optic fiber of fibers and are the ones that absorb the stress;

k. Internet communications are transferred through satellite and/or through one or more additional separate dishes and/or other wireless receivers and/or transmitters and/or free space optical receivers and/or transmitters, and this communication is transferred from there to the apartment or house on the same coax cable used for example for satellite TV, for example by using upshifters and/or downshifters, and/or over phone line cables from said transmitters and/or receivers to the computer or computers through HPNA and/or similar technology;

l. Internet communications are transferred through satellite and/or through one or more additional separate dishes and/or other wireless receivers and/or transmitters and/or free space optical receivers and/or transmitters, and this communication is transferred from there to the apartment or house on the same coax cable used for example for satellite TV, for example by using upshifters and/or downshifters, and/or over phone line cables from said transmitters and/or receivers to the computer or computers through HPNA and/or similar technology, and normal phone calls can also be transmitted through said receiver and/or transmitter and from there to the apartment for over coax or on a phone cable or Ethernet cable and/or any of the methods explained above.

12. A system of accessing the Internet through cable modems with download bandwidth per computer of more than 50 Mbps wherein the ISP supplies individual apartments with a Cable modem which uses a bandwidth channel of at least 10 MHz instead of the normal 6 MHz, and in addition this modem can be remotely configured by the ISP for various frequency bands over the 860 MHz and/or in other frequencies, so that as more bandwidth is needed the ISP can divide the typical 150-250 users who share the same line into subgroups, so that the modems in each sub-group use a different band.

18. A system of networking wherein at least when the street switchboard is close enough to the house or office, at least when the Internet connection is supplied by the phone company, HPNA connection is used also between the house and the street switchboard instead of having to use also an ADSL or VDSL modem.