Collision Avoidance System

• US 20080027647A1
• Filed: 07/05/2005
• Published: 01/31/2008
• Est. Priority Date: 07/09/2004
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: BAE Systems Plc
• Original Assignee: BAE Systems Plc
• Inventors: Ansell, Darren, Kirkham, Peter
• Application Number:
  US11/629,207
• Publication Number:
  US 20080027647A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 701/301
• CPC Class Codes: G01S 13/723 by using numerical data
• CPC Class Codes: G01S 13/933 of aircraft or spacecraft

Abstract

A method for avoiding a collision and a collision avoidance system for a host vehicle comprising detecting means adapted to detect an intruder vehicle within a predetermined region around the host vehicle and collect data on the intruder vehicle; means for predicting a projected path of the intruder vehicle in the host vehicle reference frame; means for determining a protection region around the host vehicle, and conflict determining means adapted to determine if the intruder vehicle projected path will intercept the host vehicle protection region and thereby determine if conflict exists between the host vehicle and the intruder vehicle.

Claims

1. A method for avoiding a collision between a host vehicle and an intruder vehicle comprising the steps of:

detecting an intruder vehicle within a predetermined region around the host vehicle and collecting data on the intruder vehicle position over time;

predicting a projected path of the intruder vehicle using a quadratic extrapolation of the intruder vehicle position data;

assigning a protection region around the host vehicle, and

determining if the intruder vehicle projected path will intercept the host vehicle protection region and thereby determining if there will be a conflict.

2. A method for avoiding a collision between a host vehicle and an intruder vehicle as claimed in claim 1 further comprising the step of:

on determining that there will be a conflict between the host vehicle and the intruder vehicle, calculating an alteration of the host vehicle course such that the intruder vehicle projected path will not intercept the host vehicle protection region.

3. A method for avoiding a collision between a host vehicle and an intruder vehicle as claimed in claim 1 further comprising the steps of:

on determining that there will be a conflict between the host vehicle and the intruder vehicle, assigning a protection zone around the intruder vehicle, and

calculating an alteration of the host vehicle course such that the host vehicle will not intercept the intruder vehicle protection zone.

4. A method for avoiding a collision between a host vehicle and an intruder vehicle as claimed in claim 2 or 3 further comprising the step of:

outputting the course alteration as a resolution vector to a display means or an automatic steering device.

5. A method for avoiding a collision between a host vehicle and an intruder vehicle as claimed in any of claims 2 to 4 wherein the calculation of a host vehicle course alteration takes into account host vehicle characteristics and any course alterations that do not comply with these characteristics are discarded.

6. A method for avoiding a collision between a host vehicle and an intruder vehicle as claimed in any preceding claim further comprising the step of:

in the event a conflict has been determined, calculating the time at which the intruder vehicle projected path is closest to the host vehicle.

7. A method for avoiding a collision between a host vehicle and an intruder vehicle as claimed in any of claims 2 to 6 further comprising the step of:

selecting a course alteration such that at least one of time expenditure, fuel expenditure or change in direction of the host vehicle resulting from the course alteration is minimised.

8. A method for avoiding a collision between a host vehicle and an intruder vehicle as claimed in any of claims 2 to 6 further comprising the step of:

on detecting an intruder vehicle within the host vehicle protection region, selecting an emergency course alteration.

9. A method for avoiding a collision between a host vehicle and an intruder vehicle as claimed in any preceding claim for detecting multiple intruder vehicles, further comprising the step of storing the multiple intruder vehicle position data.

10. A method for avoiding a collision between a host vehicle and an intruder vehicle as claimed in claim 9 when dependent on any of claims 2 to 8 further comprising the step of:

calculating a host vehicle course alteration which will avoid conflict with all intruder vehicles.

20. A vehicle having a collision avoidance system as claimed in any of claims 10 to 17.

11. A collision avoidance system for a host vehicle comprising:

detecting means adapted to detect an intruder vehicle within a predetermined region around the host vehicle and collect data on the intruder vehicle position over time;

means for predicting a projected path of the intruder vehicle using a quadratic extrapolation of the intruder vehicle position data;

means for assigning a protection region around the host vehicle, and

conflict determining means adapted to determine if the intruder vehicle projected path will intercept the host vehicle protection region and thereby determine if there will be a conflict.

12. A collision avoidance system as claimed in claim 11 further comprising:

conflict resolution means adapted to calculate, on determining that there will be a conflict between the host vehicle and the intruder vehicle, an alteration of the host vehicle course such that the intruder vehicle projected path does not intercept the host vehicle protection region.

13. A collision avoidance system as claimed in claim 11 further comprising:

conflict resolution means adapted to assign, on determining that there will be a conflict between the host vehicle and the intruder vehicle, a protection zone around the intruder vehicle and to calculate an alteration of the host vehicle course such that the host vehicle does not intercept the intruder vehicle protection zone.

14. A collision avoidance system as claimed in claim 12 or 13 wherein the conflict resolution means takes into account host vehicle characteristics and in use is adapted to discard any course alterations that do not comply with these characteristics.

15. A collision avoidance system as claimed in any of claims 12 to 14 further comprising:

means adapted, in the event a conflict has been determined, to calculate the time at which the intruder vehicle projected path is closest to the host vehicle.

16. A collision avoidance system as claimed in any of claims 12 to 15 wherein the conflict resolution means is adapted to select a course alteration such that at least one of time expenditure, fuel expenditure or change in direction of the host vehicle resulting from the course alteration is minimised.

17. A collision avoidance system as claimed in any of claims 12 to 15 wherein the conflict resolution means is adapted to select, on detecting an intruder vehicle within the host vehicle protection region, an emergency course alteration.

18. A collision avoidance system as claimed in any of claims 12 to 17 for use in the detection of multiple intruder vehicles, further comprising means for storing the multiple intruder vehicle position data.

19. A collision avoidance system as claimed in claim 18 adapted to calculate a host vehicle course alteration which will avoid conflict with all intruder vehicles.