System and Method for Tracking, Locating, and Identifying Known Sex Offenders

• US 20080036612A1
• Filed: 05/14/2007
• Published: 02/14/2008
• Est. Priority Date: 08/24/2005
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Brian Kolo, Chad Koslow
• Original Assignee: Brian Kolo, Chad Koslow
• Inventors: Koslow, Chad, Kolo, Brian
• Application Number:
  US11/687,631
• Publication Number:
  US 20080036612A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 340/573.4
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 21/34 involving the use of external additional devices, e.g. dongles or smart cards
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 21/6218 to a system of files or objects, e.g. local or distributed file system or database
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 2221/2149 Restricted operating environment
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 2221/2151 Time stamp
• CPC Class Codes: G08B 21/22 responsive to presence or absence of persons

Abstract

The present invention is comprised of a computer system and software used to track, locate, and/or identify sex offenders. The invention is comprised of a computer system, a GPS device carried With a sex offender, and a data storage medium. The system may be capable of notifying authorities when the sex offender enters forbidden areas such as schools, cities, counties, states, countries, or other regions designated as denied to the sex offender.

Claims

1. A tracking system to provide for tracking of at least one person, said system comprising:

a) a first portable monitoring device (“

GPS Device”

), each GPS Device comprising;

1) securing means to provide for secure attachment of said first GPS Device to said person;

2) tamper detection means to provide for detecting tampering with said first GPS Device attached to said person;

3) receiving means to provide for receiving a GPS signal from a satellite;

4) transmitting means to provide for transmission of a first signal from said first GPS Device to a GPS location computer system;

b) GPS location computer system capable of interpreting the transmission of said first signal, identifying said first GPS Device, and determining the location of said first GPS Device.

2. The tracking system of claim 1, whereby said GPS location computer system is further capable of comparing the location of said first GPS Device to a location database, thereby determining if the GPS Device is located within a location stored on said database.

3. The tracking system of claim 2, whereby said location database comprises information selected from the group consisting of:

latitude and longitude coordinate position of the location, time restrictions to access location, non-collinear latitude and longitude coordinate positions, identification of individuals who cannot enter location, law enforcement contact information, and mixtures thereof.

4. The tracking system of claim 3, whereby said location stored on a database is a location of a restricted region as defined by a specific latitude and longitude coordinate position along with a radius, and whereby if the GPS Device is located within a restricted region, said GPS location computer system notifies law enforcement.

5. The tracking system of claim 3, whereby said location of a restricted region contains time restrictions for accessing location, and whereby GPS location computer system compares current GMT time to the time restrictions for accessing location to determine said GPS Device is granted access to the location at the current GMT time.

6. The tracking system of claim 1, further comprising at least a second GPS Device attached to a second person, whereby said GPS location computer system is capable of interpreting the transmission of said first GPS Device signal and said second GPS Device signal, identifying said first and second monitoring device, and determining the location of said first and second GPS Device.

7. The tracking system of claim 6, whereby said GPS location computer system compares the location of said first and second GPS Device to find the distance between said Devices, whereby said database comprises information on the impermissible distance of said first and second GPS Device, whereby said GPS location computer system compares the distance between said Devices with the impermissible distance of said first and second GPS Device.

8. The tracking system of claim 6, whereby said GPS location computer system compares a historical tracking data for the first GPS Device with a historical tracking data for the second GPS Device and determines if the devices were located within the same specified region at different times.

9. The tracking system of claim 6, further comprising at least a third GPS Device attached to a third person, whereby said GPS location computer system is capable of interpreting the transmission of said first GPS Device signal, said second GPS Device signal, and said third GPS Device, and identifying said first, second, and third monitoring device, and determining the location of said first, second, and third GPS Device.

10. The tracking device of claim 6, wherein said first person has been convicted of a sex crime, and wherein said second person was a victim of said first person'"'"'s sex crime.

11. The tracking device of claim 10, wherein an alert is transmitted to said second person when said GPS location computer system determines said first person is within an impermissible distance of said second person.

12. The tracking device of claim 10, wherein an alert is transmitted to one or more law enforcement officials when said GPS location computer system determines said first person is within an impermissible distance of said second person.

13. The tracking system of claim 11, whereby said GPS location computer system compares a historical tracking data for the first GPS Device with a historical tracking data for the second GPS Device and determines if the devices were located within the same specified region at different times.

14. The tracking system of claim 12, whereby said GPS location computer system compares a historical tracking data for the first GPS Device with a historical tracking data for the second GPS Device and determines if the devices were located within the same specified region at different times.

15. A method of identifying criminals comprising the tracking system of claim 1 and the steps comprising:

a) a means for recording the location of the GPS Device over time; and

b) a means for identifying the location and time of a crime; and

c) a means for comparing the location and time of the GPS Device with the location and time of the crime in order to identify if the first person was present at the location and time of the crime.

16. A method of identifying criminal conspirators comprising the tracking system of claim 6 and the steps comprising:

a) a means for recording the location of the first and second GPS Device overtime; and

b) a means for identifying the location and time of a crime; and

c) a means for comparing the location and time of the first GPS Device with the location and time of the crime in order to identify if the first person was present at the location and time of the crime;

d) a means for determining if the first person and second person were in contact before or after the crime and thus potentially conspiring in the commission of the crime.

17. A method of tracking at least one sex offender, said method comprising:

securely attaching a first GPS Device to said sex offender;

providing a method to detect if said first GPS Device is tampered with;

receiving a CPS signal from a satellite;

transmitting a first signal from said first GPS Device to a GPS location computer system;

interpreting said first signal;

identifying said first monitoring device;

determining the location of said first GPS Device;

comparing the location said first GPS Device to restricted locations saved within a location database;

determining if the location of said first GPS Device is within a restricted location;

notifying law enforcement if the location of said first GPS Device is within a restricted location.

18. The method of claim 17, whereby said method further comprises:

determining the current GMT time;

comparing the current GMT time to the restricted location information saved within said location database to determine if the location of said first GPS Device is within said restricted location at an impermissible time.

19. The method of claim 17, whereby said method further comprises:

securely attaching a second GPS Device to a second person;

transmitting a second signal from said second GPS Device to said GPS location computer system;

interpreting said second signal;

identifying said second GPS Device;

determining the location of said second GPS Device;

comparing the location said second GPS Device to the location of said first GPS Device;

calculating the distance between said first GPS Device and said second GPS Device;

determining if the location between said GPS Devices is an acceptable distance; and

notifying law enforcement if the location between said GPS Devices is not an acceptable distance