METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR MERGE CONDITION DETECTION

• US 20080046858A1
• Filed: 08/03/2007
• Published: 02/21/2008
• Est. Priority Date: 08/15/2006
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Zeligsoft, Inc.
• Original Assignee: Zeligsoft, Inc.
• Inventors: HOGG, John, MCGUIRE, Tim, MCCLEAN, Tobin, HERMELING, Mark
• Application Number:
  US11/833,723
• Publication Number:
  US 20080046858A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 717/100
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 8/71 Version control security arrangements therefor G06F21/57; Configuration management

Abstract

A method and apparatus are provided for merge avoidance for a user-modifiable artifact generated by an iterative software process in a computing environment. The user-modifiable artifact may be modified many times by the user and/or by a change in the generated artifact. Current and previous generated artifacts are compared with the user-modifiable artifact. A merge condition is detected and a merge artifact are generated only in response to determination that the current and previous generated artifacts differ and that the user-modifiable artifact has been modified after generation. Merge steps, which can include an automatic or manual merge operation, can be performed in response to generation of the merge artifact. This process can be described as a method of integrating changes to an artifact generated from a software process and modified outside of the software process.

Claims

1. A method of detecting a merge condition for a user-modifiable artifact generated by an iterative software process in a computing environment, comprising:

receiving a current generated artifact as an output of a current iteration of the process;

determining whether the current generated artifact differs from a previous generated artifact by comparing the current and previous generated artifacts, the previous generated artifact being generated by a previous iteration of the process;

determining whether the user-modifiable artifact has been modified after generation by comparing the user-modifiable artifact with the previous generated artifact; and

identifying a merge condition and generating a merge artifact only in response to determination that the current and previous generated artifacts differ and that the user-modifiable artifact has been modified after generation.

2. The method of claim 1 further comprising automatically performing a merge operation in response to detection that no merge conflict exists, the merge operation being performed using the merge artifact and the user-modifiable artifact to create an updated user-modifiable artifact.

3. The method of claim 1 further comprising alerting a user to manually perform a merge operation in response to detection that a merge conflict exists.

4. The method of claim 1 further comprising deleting the merge artifact after a merge operation has been performed.

5. The method of claim 1 wherein generating the merge artifact comprises copying the contents of the current generated artifact to the merge artifact.

6. The method of claim 1 wherein the current generated artifact is deleted after the current iteration of the process, and the previous generated artifact persists after the current iteration of the process.

7. The method of claim 1 further comprising, in response to determination that the current and previous generated artifacts differ, updating the previous generated artifact to comprise the contents of the current generated artifact.

8. The method of claim 1 further comprising, in response to determination that the current and previous generated artifacts differ but the artifact has not been modified after generation, updating the user-modifiable artifact to comprise the contents of the current generated artifact.

9. The method of claim 1 further comprising, if the previous generated artifact does not exist, generating the previous generated artifact based on the current generated artifact.

10. The method of claim 1 further comprising, if the user-modifiable artifact does not exist, generating the user-modifiable artifact based on the current generated artifact.

11. The method of claim 1 wherein the user-modifiable artifact, the current generated artifact, the previous generated artifact and the merge artifact are software artifacts.

12. The method of claim 11 wherein the software artifacts each comprise software code.

13. The method of claim 11 wherein the software artifacts each comprise a model.

14. A computer-readable medium storing statements and instructions which, when executed, cause a processor to perform a method of detecting a merge condition for a user-modifiable artifact in a computing environment, the user-modifiable artifact being generated by an iterative software process, the method comprising:

receiving a current generated artifact as an output of a current iteration of the process;

determining whether the current generated artifact differs from a previous generated artifact by comparing the current and previous generated artifacts, the previous generated artifact being generated by a previous iteration of the process;

determining whether the user-modifiable artifact has been modified after generation by comparing the user-modifiable artifact with the previous generated artifact; and

identifying a merge condition and generating a merge artifact only in response to determination that the current and previous generated artifacts differ and that the user-modifiable artifact has been modified after generation.

15. The computer-readable medium of claim 14 wherein the method further comprises automatically performing a merge operation in response to detection that no merge conflict exists, the merge operation being performed using the merge artifact and the user-modifiable artifact to create an updated user-modifiable artifact.

16. The computer-readable medium of claim 14 wherein the method further comprises alerting a user to manually perform a merge operation in response to detection that a merge conflict exists.

17. The computer-readable medium of claim 14 wherein the method further comprises deleting the merge artifact after a merge operation has been performed.

18. The computer-readable medium of claim 14 wherein, in the method, generating the merge artifact comprises copying the contents of the current generated artifact to the merge artifact.

19. The computer-readable medium of claim 14 wherein, in the method, the current generated artifact is deleted after the current iteration of the process, and the previous generated artifact persists after the current iteration of the process.

20. The computer-readable medium of claim 14 wherein the method further comprises, in response to determination that the current and previous generated artifacts differ, updating the previous generated artifact to comprise the contents of the current generated artifact.

21. The computer-readable medium of claim 14 wherein the method further comprises, in response to determination that the current and previous generated artifacts differ but the artifact has not been modified after generation, updating the user-modifiable artifact to comprise the contents of the current generated artifact.

22. The computer-readable medium of claim 14 wherein the method further comprises, if the previous generated artifact does not exist, generating the previous generated artifact based on the current generated artifact.

23. The computer-readable medium of claim 14 wherein the method further comprises, if the user-modifiable artifact does not exist, generating the user-modifiable artifact based on the current generated artifact.

24. The computer-readable medium of claim 14 wherein the user-modifiable artifact, the current generated artifact, the previous generated artifact and the merge artifact are software artifacts.

25. The computer-readable medium of claim 24 wherein the software artifacts each comprise software code.

26. The computer-readable medium of claim 24 wherein the software artifacts each comprise a model.

27. An apparatus for detecting a merge condition for a user-modifiable artifact in a computing environment, the user-modifiable artifact being generated by an iterative software process, the apparatus comprising:

a generated artifact comparator to determine whether current and previous generated artifacts differ by comparing the current generated artifact with the previous generated artifact, the current generated artifact being received as an output of a current iteration of the process and the previous generated artifact being generated by a previous iteration of the process;

a user artifact comparator to determine whether the user-modifiable artifact has been modified after generation by comparing the user-modifiable artifact with the previous generated artifact; and

a merge analyzer to identify a merge condition and generate a merge artifact only in response to determination that the current and previous generated artifacts differ and that the user-modifiable artifact has been modified after generation.