TESTING SOFTWARE WITH A BUILD ENGINE

• US 20080052690A1
• Filed: 08/08/2006
• Published: 02/28/2008
• Est. Priority Date: 08/08/2006
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Microsoft Technology Licensing LLC (Microsoft Corporation)
• Original Assignee: Microsoft Corporation
• Inventors: Bharadwaj, Anutthara R.
• Application Number:
  US11/463,111
• Publication Number:
  US 20080052690A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 717/140
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 11/3696 Methods or tools to render software testable

Abstract

Implementations of the present invention include use of a build engine as a test framework driver. Since the build engine can be used with a variety of test frameworks, new test drivers do not necessarily need to be continually created for new software programs. In addition, since the build engine can be configured to use objects, actions and validations can be written in a wide variety of languages, and can be easily reused. Furthermore, use of the build engine as a test framework driver, particularly within the context of XML, can allow complex scenarios and test cases to be readily automated, without the learning curve and compilation requirements typically associated therewith. In particular, a software tester simply visually compose an automated test case from a library of available tasks without having to write a test code or scripts.

Claims

1. At a build engine in a computerized environment, the build engine comprising one or more targets otherwise configured to build a software program when executed through the build engine, a method of testing a preliminary version of software without necessarily building an end-user version of the software, comprising the acts of:

receiving one or more function calls for a project details target, the one or more project details target calls including at least an indication of software to be tested in a project file;

receiving one or more function calls for a pre-run target, the one or more pre-run target calls identifying one or more set up actions;

receiving one or more function calls for a scenario target, the one or more scenario target calls including a request for one or more actions to be executed by the software and one or more validations to be performed after executing the one or more actions;

receiving one or more function calls for a post-run target, the one or more post-run target calls identifying one or more finishing actions; and

upon executing the one or more function calls, generating a feedback report for the project file.

2. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein the scenario target calls include an indication of a plurality of actions and a plurality of validations of the plurality of actions to be performed by the build engine.

3. The method as recited in claim 2, wherein the plurality of actions have been randomly mixed prior to being received through the scenario target calls.

4. The method as recited in claim 3, wherein the plurality of actions have been automatically randomized prior to being received through the scenario target calls.

5. The method as recited in claim 4, wherein the plurality of actions have further been subject to one or more constraints that limit the randomized actions to one or more sequences of the actions that are possible.

6. The method as recited in claim 1, further comprising an act of receiving one or more function calls for a different scenario target, the different scenario target calls including a request for one or more different actions to be executed by the software and one or more different validations to be performed after executing the one or more different actions.

7. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein the one or more project details target calls further include one or more of a project name, a date and time, and a number of scenarios to be executed.

8. The method as recited in claim 1, further comprising identifying a request for a debug function, the debug function being configured to set one or more breakpoints of execution in the project file.

9. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein the one or more set up actions include one or more requests to execute one or more environmental components that are to be used by the software during execution.

10. The method as recited in claim 9, wherein the one or more post-run target calls include one or more requests to close the one or more environmental components executed by the pre-run target calls.

11. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein project file is an interchange file format, such as an XML format file.

12. The method as recited in claim 1, further comprising an act of identifying one or more target starting points and one or more target ending points through a logger interface.

13. In a computerized environment comprising a build engine installed therein and a testing computer having access to the build engine, a method of testing a preliminary version of software through the testing computer system and the build engine without otherwise creating an end-user version of the software, comprising the acts of:

identifying one or more project details, the project details including a name of a project and a number of scenarios running in accordance with a project to test software of interest;

identifying one or more components to be initiated in order to test the software of interest;

identifying one or more scenarios that include a set of one or more actions and at least one validation to be performed for each set of one or more actions;

generating a project file that includes a call to a target for each identified one or more project details, each identified one or more components to be initiated, and each identified scenario; and

passing one or more instructions to execute the project file at a build engine.

14. The method as recited in claim 13, further comprising the acts of:

identifying a plurality of actions to be performed within the identified one or more scenarios; and

randomizing the plurality of actions.

15. The method as recited in claim 14, further comprising an act of constraining the randomizing of the plurality of actions to one or more rules.

16. The method as recited in claim 13, further comprising including within the project file one or more post-run target calls configured to close each of the one or more components after the one or more scenarios have been executed.

17. The method as recited in claim 13, further comprising a step for executing the project file through the build engine to simulate a larger than expected amount of load on a computer system.

18. The method as recited in claim 17, wherein the step for executing the project file further comprises an act of submitting multiple copies of the project file to the build engine, such that the build engine executes on the multiple copies of the project file.

19. The method as recited in claim 17, wherein the step for executing the project file further comprises an act of instructing the build engine to execute the project file a plurality of times.

20. In a computerized environment that includes a build engine having one or more targets otherwise configured to build a software program when executed through the build engine, a computer program product having computer-executable code stored thereon that, when executed, cause one or more processors in a computer system to perform a method of testing a preliminary version of software without necessarily building an end-user version of the software, comprising the acts of:

receiving one or more function calls for a project details target, the one or more project details target calls including at least an indication of software to be tested in a project file;

receiving one or more function calls for a pre-run target, the one or more pre-run target calls identifying one or more set up actions;

receiving one or more function calls for a scenario target, the one or more scenario target calls including a request for one or more actions to be executed by the software and one or more validations to be performed after executing the one or more actions;

receiving one or more function calls for a post-run target, the one or more post-run target calls identifying one or more finishing actions; and

upon executing the one or more function calls, generating a feedback report for the project file.