Search system and method with text function tagging

• US 20080059451A1
• Filed: 04/04/2007
• Published: 03/06/2008
• Est. Priority Date: 04/04/2006
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: TextDigger, Inc.
• Original Assignee: TextDigger, Inc.
• Inventors: Musgrove, Timothy
• Granted Patent: US 8,862,573 B2
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 707/5
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 16/24 Querying
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 16/245 Query processing
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 16/81 Indexing, e.g. XML tags; Data structures therefor; Storage structures
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 16/951 Indexing; Web crawling techniques
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 40/134 Hyperlinking

Abstract

A search system with a user interface module that generates a search engine results page including a listing of reference documents, each with a hyperlink to at least one secondary document relevant to the reference document. The search system also includes a text function tagger that parses text excerpts of the documents, and applies text function tags thereto. A secondary processing module is provided which identifies those secondary documents that have a text function tag that matches a text function tag of a reference document, so that selection of the hyperlink generates a display of secondary documents that are determined to at least have a text function tag that matches a text function tag of the reference document for which corresponding hyperlink was selected. A method and computer readable medium are also provided.

Claims

1. A search system for identifying electronic documents stored on a computer readable media, and providing a search result in response to a search query, comprising:

a user interface module that receives a search query from a user; and

a search engine that accesses a corpus of electronic documents to identify a predetermined number of documents that satisfy the search query, the identified documents including predetermined number of reference documents which are a subset of the identified documents deemed by the search engine to be most relevant to the search query, and secondary documents which are not reference documents;

wherein the user interface module further generates a search engine results page in response to the search query, the search engine results page including a listing of the identified reference documents, each with a hyperlink to at least one secondary document.

2. The search system of claim 1, further including a text function tagger that parses text excerpts of the reference documents and secondary documents, and applies text function tags to the text excerpts of the reference documents and secondary documents.

3. The search system of claim 2, further including a secondary processing module that identifies those secondary documents that have a text function tag that matches a text function tag of a reference document.

4. The search system of claim 3, wherein selection of a hyperlink generates a display of secondary documents that are determined to at least have a text function tag that is determined by the secondary processing module to be a match with a text function tag of the reference document for which corresponding hyperlink was selected.

5. The search system of claim 4, wherein the secondary processing module is further adapted to determine whether the matching text function tags of reference document and the secondary document are for the same or similar word.

6. The search system of claim 5, wherein the display of secondary documents are limited to those secondary documents that are determined to have a text function tag that matches the text function tag of the reference document for the same, or similar, word in the text excerpt.

7. The search system of claim 3, wherein the text excerpts parsed by the text function tagger include sentences and snippets.

8. The search system of claim 3, wherein the secondary processing module is further adapted to ignore predetermined text function tags applied by the text function tagger.

9. The search system of claim 3, wherein the secondary processing module is further adapted to group predetermined text function tags applied by the text function tagger so that any text function tag of a secondary document that is within the group is deemed to match any text function tag of a reference document that is also within the group.

10. The search system of claim 3, wherein the secondary processing module is further adapted to refer to an electronic thesaurus or WordNet to determine whether words tagged by the text function tagger are similar if they are not the same.

11. The search system of claim 3, wherein the text function tags applied by the text function tagger includes at least one of <

Interrogative>

, <

Supporting example>

, <

Description>

, <

Definition>

, <

Warning>

, <

Emphasis>

, <

Inference>

, <

Quantification>

, <

Avoidance goal>

, <

Diminution>

, <

Contributory cause>

, <

Logical connection>

, and <

Causal connection>

tag.

12. A search system for identifying electronic documents stored on a computer readable media, and providing a search result in response to a search query, comprising:

a user interface module that receives a search query from a user; and

a search engine that accesses a corpus of electronic documents to identify documents that satisfy the search query;

wherein the user interface module further generates a display of a search engine results page in response to the search query, the search engine results page including a listing of a subset of the identified documents deemed by the search engine to be most relevant to the search query, each of the listed documents having a hyperlink to at least one similar document, the similar document being selected from the documents that satisfy the search query which were identified by the search engine.

13. A method for identifying electronic documents stored on a computer readable media, and providing a search result in response to a search query, comprising:

receiving a search query;

identifying a predetermined number of documents that satisfy the search query, the predetermined number of documents including reference documents which are a subset of the identified documents that are deemed to be the most relevant to the search query, and secondary documents which are not the reference documents; and

generating a search engine results page in response to the search query, the search engine results page including a listing of the identified reference documents, each with a hyperlink to at least one secondary document.

14. The method of claim 13, further including parsing text excerpts of the reference documents and secondary documents, and applying text function tags to the text excerpts of the reference documents and secondary documents.

15. The method of claim 14, further including identifying those secondary documents that have text function tags that matches a text function tag of a reference document.

16. The method of claim 15, further including receiving a selection of a hyperlink, and generating a display of secondary documents that are determined to at least have a text function tag that matches a text function tag of the reference document for which corresponding hyperlink was selected.

17. The method of claim 16, further including determining whether the matching text function tags of reference document and the secondary document are for the same or similar word.

18. The method of claim 17, further including limiting the display of secondary documents to those secondary documents that are determined to have a text function tag that matches the text function tag of the reference document for the same or similar word.

19. The method of claim 15, wherein the text excerpts parsed include sentences and snippets.

20. The method of claim 15, further including ignoring predetermined text function tags applied.

21. The method of claim 15, further including grouping predetermined text function tags together so that any text function tag of a secondary document that is within the group is deemed to match any text function tag of a reference document that is also within the group.

22. The method of claim 15, further including referencing an electronic thesaurus or WordNet to determine whether words tagged are similar if they are not the same.

23. The method of claim 15, wherein the text function tags applied includes at least one of <

Interrogative>

, <

Supporting example>

, <

Description>

, <

Definition>

, <

Warning>

, <

Emphasis>

, <

Inference>

, <

Quantification>

, <

Avoidance goal>

, <

Diminution>

, <

Contributory cause>

, <

Logical connection>

, and <

Causal connection>

tag.

24. A method for identifying electronic documents stored on a computer readable media, and providing a search result in response to a search query, comprising:

receiving a search query from a user;

accessing a corpus of electronic documents to identify documents that satisfy the search query; and

generating a search engine results page in response to the search query, the search engine results page including a listing of a subset of the identified documents deemed to be most relevant to the search query, each of the listed documents having a hyperlink to a similar document;

wherein the similar document is selected from the identified documents that satisfy the search query.

25. A computer readable medium with executable instructions for identifying electronic documents stored on a computer readable media, and providing a search result in response to a search query, comprising:

instructions for receiving a search query;

instructions for identifying a predetermined number of documents that satisfy the search query, the predetermined number of documents including reference documents which are a subset of the identified documents that are deemed to be the most relevant to the search query, and secondary documents which are not the reference documents; and

instructions for generating a search engine results page in response to the search query, the search engine results page including a listing of the identified reference documents, each with a hyperlink to at least one secondary document.

26. The computer readable medium of claim 25, further including instructions for parsing text excerpts of the reference documents and secondary documents, and instructions for applying text function tags to the text excerpts of the reference documents and secondary documents.

27. The computer readable medium of claim 26, further including instructions for identifying those secondary documents that have text function tags that matches a text function tag of a reference document.

28. The computer readable medium of claim 27, further including instructions for receiving a selection of a hyperlink, and instructions for generating a display of secondary documents that are determined to at least have a text function tag that matches a text function tag of the reference document for which corresponding hyperlink was selected.

29. The computer readable medium of claim 28, further including instructions for determining whether the matching text function tags of reference document and the secondary document are for the same or similar word.

30. The computer readable medium of claim 29, further including instructions for limiting the display of secondary documents to those secondary documents that are determined to have a text function tag that matches the text function tag of the reference document for the same or similar word.

31. The computer readable medium of claim 27, wherein the text excerpts parsed include sentences and snippets.

32. The computer readable medium of claim 27, further including instructions for ignoring predetermined text function tags applied.

33. The computer readable medium of claim 27, further including instructions for grouping predetermined text function tags together so that any text function tag of a secondary document that is within the group is deemed to match any text function tag of a reference document that is also within the group.

34. The computer readable medium of claim 27, further including instructions for referencing an electronic thesaurus or WordNet to determine whether words tagged are similar if they are not the same.

35. The computer readable medium of claim 27, wherein the text function tags applied includes at least one of <

Interrogative>

, <

Supporting example>

, <

Description>

, <

Definition>

, <

Warning>

, <

Emphasis>

, <

Inference>

, <

Quantification>

, <

Avoidance goal>

, <

Diminution>

, <

Contributory cause>

, <

Logical connection>

, and <

Causal connection>

tag.

36. A computer readable medium with executable instructions for identifying electronic documents stored on a computer readable media, and providing a search result in response to a search query, comprising:

instructions for receiving a search query from a user;

instructions for accessing a corpus of electronic documents to identify documents that satisfy the search query; and

instructions for generating a search engine results page in response to the search query, the search engine results page including a listing of a subset of the identified documents deemed to be most relevant to the search query, each of the listed documents having a hyperlink to a similar document;

wherein the similar document is selected from the identified documents that satisfy the search query.