Spam control systems and methods

• US 20080082658A1
• Filed: 09/29/2006
• Published: 04/03/2008
• Est. Priority Date: 09/29/2006
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. (HP Inc.)
• Original Assignee: Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. (HP Inc.)
• Inventors: Scoredos, Eric C., Hsu, Wan-Yen
• Application Number:
  US11/540,274
• Publication Number:
  US 20080082658A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 709/224
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 51/212 using filtering or selective blocking

Abstract

Various embodiments of spam control systems and methods are disclosed. One method embodiment, among others, comprises identifying an IP address as a spam source, and monitoring the activity of the IP address to determine if the IP address is re-assigned to another source.

Claims

1. A spam control method, comprising:

identifying an IP address as a spam source; and

monitoring activity of the IP address to determine if the IP address is re-assigned to another source.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein identifying further comprises entering the IP address in a first list of IP addresses corresponding to spam sources, wherein packets associated with the IP address are disallowed from passing to recipient devices while the IP address is in the first list.

3. The method of claim 2, further comprising removing the IP address from the first list and entering the IP address into a second list responsive to determining that no activity for the IP address is detected during a first predetermined time period, the second list configured to store IP addresses that are moved from the first list and that are each monitored for a second predetermined time period.

4. The method of claim 3, further comprising monitoring the IP address during the second predetermined time period to determine if spamming activity is detected in association with the IP address during the second predetermined time period.

5. The method of claim 4, further comprising removing the IP address from the second list and returning the IP address to the first list responsive to determining that spamming activity is detected in association with the IP address during the second predetermined time period.

6. The method of claim 5, further comprising logging a message that indicates that the IP address returned to the first list is associated with a spam source.

7. The method of claim 4, further comprising removing the IP address from the second list and allowing passage of packets corresponding to the removed IP address to an email recipient downstream of a device in which the spam control method is implemented responsive to determining that no spamming activity corresponding to the IP address is detected during the second predetermined time period.

8. The method of claim 3, further comprising restarting the first predetermined time period responsive to detecting activity of the IP address during the first predetermined time period.

9. The method of claim 1, wherein monitoring further comprises determining whether a connection request from the IP address occurs during a first predetermined time period.

10. The method of claim 9, wherein monitoring further comprises tracking the progression of time from a first time reference to a second time reference, the difference in time between the first time reference and the second time reference comprising the first predetermined time period.

11. A spam control system, comprising:

a memory with logic; and

a processor configured with the logic to monitor activity of an IP address associated with a spam source and responsive to the monitoring, determine if the IP address is re-assigned to another source.

12. The system of claim 11, wherein the processor is further configured with the logic to store the IP address in a first list, the first list comprising one or more data structures of static and dynamic IP addresses, the static and dynamic IP addresses associated with packets that are blocked from passing to email recipients downstream of the spam control system.

13. The system of claim 12, wherein the processor is further configured with the logic to remove the IP address from the first list and store the IP address into a second list responsive to determining that no activity for the IP address is detected during a first predetermined time period, the second list configured to store IP addresses that are moved from the first list and that are each monitored for a second predetermined time period.

14. The system of claim 13, wherein the processor is further configured with the logic to monitor the IP address during the second predetermined time period to determine if spamming activity is detected in association with the IP address during the second predetermined time period.

15. The system of claim 14, wherein the processor is further configured with the logic to remove the IP address from the second list and return the IP address to the first list responsive to determining that spamming activity is detected in association with the IP during the second predetermined time period.

16. The system of claim 15, wherein the processor is further configured with the logic to log a message that indicates that the IP address returned to the first list is associated with a spam source.

17. The system of claim 14, wherein the processor is further configured with the logic to remove the IP address from the second list and allow the passage of packets corresponding to the IP address to email recipients responsive to determining that no spamming activity corresponding to the IP address is detected during the second predetermined time period.

18. The system of claim 13, wherein the processor is further configured with the logic to restart the first predetermined time period responsive to detecting activity of the IP address during the first predetermined time period.

19. The system of claim 11, wherein the processor is further configured with the logic to determine whether a connection request from the IP address occurs during a first predetermined time period.

20. The system of claim 19, wherein the processor is further configured with the logic to track the progression of time from a first time reference to a second time reference, the difference in time between the first time reference and the second time reference comprising the first predetermined time period.

21. A spam control system, comprising:

means for monitoring activity of an IP address associated with a spam source; and

means for determining whether the IP address has been re-assigned to another source.

22. The system of claim 21, wherein the means for monitoring comprises means for monitoring during a first predetermined time period.

23. The system of claim 22, wherein the means for monitoring comprises means for monitoring during a second predetermined time period responsive to detecting no activity associated with the IP address during the first predetermined time period.

24. The system of claim 23, wherein the means for determining comprises means for inferring from the absence of spam activity during the second predetermined time period that the IP address has been re-assigned to the another source.

25. A computer-readable storage medium having computer-executable functions for implementing spam control, comprising:

logic configured to identify an IP address as a spam source; and

logic configured to monitor activity of the IP address to determine if the IP address is re-assigned to another source.