System and method for ride matching

• US 20080091342A1
• Filed: 10/11/2006
• Published: 04/17/2008
• Est. Priority Date: 10/11/2006
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Oriole Software Incorporated
• Original Assignee: Jeffrey Assael
• Inventors: Assael, Jeffrey
• Application Number:
  US11/546,811
• Publication Number:
  US 20080091342A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 701/202
• CPC Class Codes: G01C 21/3438 Rendez-vous, i.e. searching a destination where several users can meet, and the routes to this destination for these users; Ride sharing, i.e. searching a route such that at least two users can share a vehicle for at least part of the route
• CPC Class Codes: G08G 1/202 Dispatching vehicles on the basis of a location, e.g. taxi dispatching

Abstract

Users are matched for ridesharing based on where they are from (origin), where they are going (destination), when they are traveling (time), and how often (frequency). Other commuting preferences may also be considered. Geographic matching is based on cross-streets rather than exact street addresses. Locations are geocoded for latitude and longitude. The other users stored in the database are matched with the user by comparing the user'"'"'s data with the other user'"'"'s data stored in a database. The user is presented with alias information regarding the matched users in the database for ridesharing. The order in which the matched users are presented may be weighed towards distance or time. Along with the alias information, ratings of these matched users can be displayed. The rating of a user is based on the past impressions of the rated user by other users.

Claims

1. A method of matching users with similar travel requirements to facilitate ridesharing, comprising the steps of:

receiving a start location SL for a user based on cross-streets,

receiving a destination location DL for the user based on cross-streets,

receiving a start time ST for the user;

receiving an arrival time AT for the user;

receiving a listing preference for the user, wherein the listing preference indicates whether time or distance is a more important factor for the user;

converting the received cross-streets for the start location SL for the user and the destination location DL for the user to latitude and longitude values;

comparing the converted start location SL for the user with the converted start locations of other users stored in a database;

comparing the converted destination location DL for the user with the converted destination locations of other users stored in the database;

comparing the start time ST for the user with the start times of other users stored in the database;

comparing the arrival time AT for the user with the arrival times of other users stored in the database;

matching the other users stored in the database with the user based on the steps of comparing the start locations, comparing the destination locations, comparing the start times, and comparing the arrival times;

presenting the user with alias information regarding the matched users in the database, wherein the matched users are listed in an order of priority based upon the received listing preference, wherein more weight is given to distance when the received listing preference indicates distance as a more important factor for the user, and more weight is given to time when the received listing preference indicates time as a more important factor for the user;

providing the user with access to the matched users with the alias information.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the order of priority is determined by the following formula:

P=(Δ

SL²+Δ

DL²)+K(Δ

ST²+Δ

AT²)

wherein P represents a priority ranking value;

wherein Δ

SL represents the difference in distance between the starting location of the user and the starting location of a matched user in the database;

wherein Δ

DL represents the difference in distance between the destination location of the user and the destination location of the matched user in the database;

wherein Δ

ST represents the difference in time between the starting time of the user and the starting time of the matched user in the database;

wherein Δ

AT represents the difference in time between the arrival time of the user and the arrival time of the matched user in the database;

wherein K represents a weighting factor for the listing preference.

3. The method of claim 2, wherein a matched user with a lower P value is listed before a matched user with a higher P value, and a K value of greater than one represents a greater weight towards distance, and a K value of less than one represents a greater weight towards time.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein the step of presenting includes the step of displaying a rating for the matched user, wherein the rating is based on feedback from a peer user based on the peer user'"'"'s past impressions of the matched user.

5. The method of claim 1, wherein the step of comparing the start locations further comprises the steps of determining whether the start location SL_i+1 of another user stored in the database is within a selected distance from the start location SL of the user.

6. The method of claim 5, wherein the selected distance is five percent of the distance between the start location SL and the destination location DL.

7. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

receiving a commuting gender preference for the user;

comparing the commuting gender preference for the user with the gender of other users stored in the database; and

wherein the step of matching the other users stored in the database with the user is further based on the step of comparing the commuting gender preference for the user.

8. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

receiving a start city SC for the user;

receiving a destination city DC for the user;

comparing the start city SC for the user with the destination city of other users stored in the database; and

comparing the destination city DC for the user with the destination city of other users stored in the database; and

wherein the step of matching the other users stored in the database with the user is further based on the steps of comparing the start city and comparing the destination city.

9. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

receiving a frequency of travel F value for the user, wherein the frequency of travel F indicates whether the user is seeking a rideshare arrangement for a one-time trip or for a regular commute;

comparing the frequency of travel F for the user with the frequency of travel F_i+1 of other users stored in the database;

wherein the step of matching the other users stored in the database with the user is further based on the step of comparing the frequency of travel.

10. A method of matching users with similar travel requirements to facilitate ridesharing, comprising the steps of:

receiving a start location SL for a user based on cross-streets,

receiving a destination location DL for the user based on cross-streets,

receiving a start time ST for the user;

receiving an arrival time AT for the user;

converting the received cross-streets for the start location SL for the user and the destination location DL for the user to latitude and longitude values;

comparing the converted start location SL for the user with the converted start locations of other users stored in a database;

comparing the converted destination location DL for the user with the converted destination locations of other users stored in the database;

comparing the start time ST for the user with the start times of other users stored in the database;

comparing the arrival time AT for the user with the arrival times of other users stored in the database;

matching the other users stored in the database with the user based on the steps of comparing the start locations, comparing the destination locations, comparing the start times, and comparing the arrival times;

presenting the user with alias information regarding the matched users in the database as a result from the step of matching, and ratings for the matched users, wherein the rating of the matched user is based on feedback from a peer user regarding the past performance of the matched user;

providing the user with access to the other users with the alias information.

11. The method of claim 10, further comprising the step of receiving a listing preference for the user, wherein the listing preference indicates whether time or distance is a more important factor for the user;

wherein the matched users in the step of presenting the user with alias information, are listed in an order of priority based upon the received listing preference, wherein more weight is given to distance when the received listing preference indicates distance as a more important factor for the user, and more weight is given to time when the received listing preference indicates time as a more important factor for the user.

12. The method of claim 10, further comprising the step of receiving a listing preference from the user, and

wherein the step of presenting includes the step of listing the matched users in an order of priority based upon a received listing preference from the user, wherein the order of priority is determined by the following formula:

P=(Δ

SL²+Δ

DL²)+K(Δ

ST²+Δ

AT²)

wherein P represents a priority ranking value, and a matched user with a lower P value is listed before a matched user with a higher P value;

wherein Δ

SL represents the difference in distance between the starting location of the user and the starting location of a matched user in the database;

wherein Δ

DL represents the difference in distance between the destination location of the user and the destination location of the matched user in the database;

wherein Δ

ST represents the difference in time between the starting time of the user and the starting time of the matched user in the database;

wherein Δ

AT represents the difference in time between the arrival time of the user and the arrival time of the matched user in the database;

wherein K represents a weighting factor, wherein a K of greater than 1 more heavily weighs distance, and a K of less than 1 more heavily weighs time.

13. The method of claim 12, wherein a matched user with a lower P value is listed before a matched user with a higher P value, and a K value of greater than one represents a greater weight towards distance, and a K value of less than one represents a greater weight towards time.

14. The method of claim 10, wherein the step of comparing the destination locations further comprises the steps of determining whether the destination location DL_i+1 of another user stored in the database is within a selected distance from the destination location DL of the user.

15. The method of claim 14, wherein the selected distance is five percent of the distance between the start location SL and the destination location DL.

16. The method of claim 10, further comprising:

receiving a commuting gender preference for the user;

comparing the commuting gender preference for the user with the gender of other users stored in the database; and

wherein the step of matching the other users stored in the database with the user is further based on the step of comparing the commuting gender preference for the user.

17. The method of claim 10, further comprising:

receiving a start city SC for the user;

receiving a destination city DC for the user;

comparing the start city SC for the user with the destination city of other users stored in the database; and

comparing the destination city DC for the user with the destination city of other users stored in the database; and

wherein the step of matching the other users stored in the database with the user is further based on the steps of comparing the start city and comparing the destination city.

18. The method of claim 10, further comprising:

receiving a frequency of travel F value for the user, wherein the frequency of travel F indicates whether the user is seeking a rideshare arrangement for a one-time trip or for a regular commute;

comparing the frequency of travel F for the user with the frequency of travel F_i+1 of other users stored in the database; and

wherein the step of matching the other users stored in the database with the user is further based on the step of comparing the frequency of travel.

19. A method of matching users with similar travel requirements to facilitate ridesharing, comprising the steps of:

receiving a start location SL for a user based on cross-streets,

receiving a travel limit TL for the user;

converting the received cross-streets for the start location SL for the user to latitude and longitude values;

comparing the converted start location SL for the user with the converted start locations of other users stored in a database;

determining whether the converted destination locations of other users stored in the database are within the distance defined by the travel limit TL;

matching the other users stored in the database with the user based on the steps of comparing and determining;

presenting the user with alias information regarding the matched users in the database;

providing the user with access to the matched users with the alias information.

20. The method of claim 19, wherein the step of comparing the converted start location SL for the user with the converted start locations of other users stored in a database, includes determining whether the converted start locations of other users stored in a database are within a selected distance of the converted start location SL for the user, wherein the selected distance is five percent of the travel limit TL.

21. The method of claim 19, further comprising the steps of:

receiving a start time ST for the user;

determining whether the start times of other users stored in the database are within a time window of the start time ST for the user;

wherein the step of matching is further based on the step of determining whether the start times of other users stored in the database are within the time window.

22. The method of claim 21, further comprising the steps of:

receiving a listing preference for the user, wherein the listing preference indicates whether time or distance is a more important factor for the user;

wherein the matched users are listed in an order of priority based upon the received listing preference, wherein more weight is given to distance when the received listing preference indicates distance as a more important factor for the user, and more weight is given to time when the received listing preference indicates time as a more important factor for the user.