VALIDATING SEGMENTATION CRITERIA

• US 20080104066A1
• Filed: 10/27/2006
• Published: 05/01/2008
• Est. Priority Date: 10/27/2006
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Oath Inc. (Verizon Communications Inc.)
• Original Assignee: Yahoo! Inc. (Apollo Global Management, Inc.)
• Inventors: Wang, Jian
• Application Number:
  US11/553,585
• Publication Number:
  US 20080104066A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 707/6
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 16/285 Clustering or classification
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 16/90 Details of database functions independent of the retrieved data types

Abstract

Segmentation criteria are validated relative to a plurality of items organized according to a dimensionally-modeled data space. Each criterion nominally characterizes a segment comprising an area of interest of the dimensionally-modeled data space. The items are mapped to the segments. The mapping is processed. Based on the mapping, the validity of the segmentation criteria is evaluated, and a result of the evaluation is reported.

Claims

1. A method of validating segmentation criteria relative to a plurality of items organized according to a dimensionally-modeled data space, wherein each criterion nominally characterizes a segment comprising an area of interest of the dimensionally-modeled data space, the method comprising:

mapping the items to the segments characterized by the segmentation criteria;

processing the mapping and evaluating, based thereon, validity of the segmentation criteria; and

reporting a result of the evaluating.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein:

processing the mapping includes;

for each of at least some of the items, determining whether that item is not mapped to any of the segments; and

determining the propriety of the segmentation criteria based at least in part on the determinations of whether an item is not mapped to any of the segments.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein:

processing the mapping includes;

for each of at least some of the items, determining whether that item is mapped to more than one of the segments; and

determining the propriety of the segmentation criteria based at least in part on the determinations of whether at least one item is mapped to more than one of the segments.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein:

mapping the items to the segments includes, for every attribute combination of each segmentation criterion, determining whether an item maps to a segment characterized by that attribute combination.

5. The method of claim 4, wherein:

the mapping step includes considering every attribute combination of each segmentation criterion.

6. The method of claim 1, wherein:

the reporting step includes reporting whether there are any gaps among the segments.

7. The method of claim 1, wherein:

the reporting step includes reporting whether there is any overlap among the segments.

8. The method of claim 1, wherein:

the items are actual items for which there are corresponding records.

9. The method of claim 1, wherein:

the items are pseudo-items, each characterized by a different combination of values of key attributes, according to which the segmentation criteria are defined.

10. (canceled)

11. A computer program product for validating segmentation criteria relative to a plurality of items organized according to a dimensionally-modeled data space, wherein each criterion nominally characterizes a segment comprising an area of interest of the dimensionally-modeled data space, the computer program product comprising at least one computer-readable medium having computer program instructions stored therein which are operable to cause the at least one computing device to:

map the items to the segments characterized by the segmentation criteria;

process the mapping and evaluate, based thereon, validity of the segmentation criteria; and

report a result of the evaluating.

12. The computer program product of claim 11, wherein:

the computer program instructions operable to cause the at least one computing device to process the mapping includes computer program instructions operable to cause the at least one computing device to;

for each of at least some of the items, determine whether that item is not mapped to any of the segments; and

determine the propriety of the segmentation criteria based at least in part on the determinations of whether an item is not mapped to any of the segments.

13. The computer program product of claim 11, wherein:

the computer program instructions operable to cause the at least one computing device to process the mapping includes computer program instructions operable to cause the at least one computing device to;

for each of at least some of the items, determine whether that item is mapped to more than one of the segments; and

determine the propriety of the segmentation criteria based at least in part on the determinations of whether at least one item is mapped to more than one of the segments.

14. The computer program product of claim 11, wherein:

the computer program instructions operable to cause the at least one computing device to map the items to the segments includes computer program instructions operable to cause the at least one computing device to;

for every attribute combination of each segmentation criterion, determine whether an item maps to a segment characterized by that attribute combination.

15. The computer program product of claim 14, wherein:

the computer program instructions operable to cause the at least one computing device to map the items to the segments includes computer program instructions operable to cause the at least one computing device to;

consider every attribute combination of each segmentation criterion.

16. The computer program product of claim 11, wherein:

the computer program instructions operable to cause the at least one computing device to report a result of the evaluating includes computer program instructions operable to cause the at least one computing device to;

report whether there are any gaps among the segments.

17. The computer program product of claim 11, wherein:

the computer program instructions operable to cause the at least one computing device to report a result of the evaluating includes computer program instructions operable to cause the at least one computing device to;

report whether there is any overlap among the segments.

18. The computer program product of claim 11, wherein:

the items are actual items for which there are corresponding records.

19. (canceled)

20. A computing system, wherein the computing system is configured to validate segmentation criteria relative to a plurality of items organized according to a dimensionally-modeled data space, wherein each criterion nominally characterizes a segment comprising an area of interest of the dimensionally-modeled data space, the computing system configured to:

map the items to the segments characterized by the segmentation criteria;

process the mapping and evaluate, based thereon, validity of the segmentation criteria; and

report a result of the evaluating.

21. The computing system of claim 20, wherein:

the computing system being configured to process the mapping includes the computing system being configured to;

for each of at least some of the items, determine whether that item is not mapped to any of the segments; and

determine the propriety of the segmentation criteria based at least in part on the determinations of whether an item is not mapped to any of the segments.

22. The computing system of claim 20, wherein:

the computing system being configured to process the mapping includes the computing system being configured to;

for each of at least some of the items, determine whether that item is mapped to more than one of the segments; and

determine the propriety of the segmentation criteria based at least in part on the determinations of whether at least one item is mapped to more than one of the segments.

23. The computing system of claim 20, wherein:

the computing system being configured to map the items to the segments includes the computing system being configured to;

for every attribute combination of each segmentation criterion, determine whether an item maps to a segment characterized by that attribute combination.

24. The computing system of claim 23, wherein:

the computing system being configured to map the items to the segments includes the computing system being configured to;

consider every attribute combination of each segmentation criterion.

25. The computing system of claim 20, wherein:

the computing system being configured to report a result of the evaluating includes the computing system being configured to;

report whether there are any gaps among the segments.

26. The computing system of claim 20, wherein:

the computing system being configured to report a result of the evaluating includes the computing system being configured to;

report whether there is any overlap among the segments.

28. The computing system of claim 20, wherein:

the items are pseudo-items, each characterized by a different combination of values of key attributes, according to which the segmentation criteria are defined.

27. (canceled)