CRYPTOLOGY CALCULATION FOR LAST USED AUTHENTICATION DEVICE

• US 20080107266A1
• Filed: 10/31/2007
• Published: 05/08/2008
• Est. Priority Date: 11/03/2006
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Siemens VDO Automotive Corporation (Siemens AG)
• Original Assignee: Siemens VDO Automotive Corporation (Siemens AG)
• Inventors: Marlett, Brian, Kachouh, Patricia, Herrera Martinez, Jose Luis, Carrera Manjarrez, Mauricio
• Application Number:
  US11/930,876
• Publication Number:
  US 20080107266A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 380/258
• CPC Class Codes: G07C 2009/00388 code verification carried out according to the challenge/response method
• CPC Class Codes: G07C 2009/00412 the transmitted data signal being encrypted
• CPC Class Codes: G07C 2009/005 whereby the code is a random code
• CPC Class Codes: G07C 9/00309 operated with bidirectional data transmission between data carrier and locks
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 2209/84 Vehicles
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 9/3271 using challenge-response

Abstract

A passive start and entry system includes a controller that determines the desired encryption for a last authenticated identification device during the period in which responses are received from any proximate identification devices. This process allows for the transmission of encrypted data to the last authenticated device without delay upon the expiration of the wait period.

Claims

1. A passive start and entry system for a motor vehicle comprising:

a control module including a transmitter for transmitting a challenge transmission and a receiver for receiving a response to the challenge transmission; and

a plurality of remote control devices, wherein the control module calculates an encrypted signal for only a last authenticated one of the plurality of remote control devices before receipt of a response signal from any of the plurality of remote controls.

2. The system as recited in claim 1, wherein each of the plurality of remote control devices includes a unique identifier sent to the controller upon receipt of the challenge transmission

3. The system as recited in claim 2, wherein each of the plurality of remote control devices proximate the control module sends a response transmission in response to the challenge transmission.

4. The system as recited in claim 1, wherein the control module waits a desired period for responses from any of the plurality of remote control devices prior to sending the encrypted signal.

5. The system as recited in claim 4, wherein the control module sends the encrypted signal to the last authenticated one of the plurality of remote control devices after the desired wait time has expired.

6. The system as recited in claim 5, wherein the control module calculates the encrypted signal during the desired period for responses from any of the plurality of remote control devices.

7. The system as recited in claim 1, wherein the control module calculates a new encrypted signal after the wait time in response to receiving a response from a one of the plurality of remote control devices not authenticated in the immediately preceding authentication process.

8. A method of authenticating a remote control device for a passive start and entry system comprising the steps of:

a) sending a challenge transmission from a control module;

b) calculating an initial encrypted signal for a last authenticated one of a plurality of remote control devices with the control module during a wait time for a response from any of the plurality of remote control devices to the challenge transmission; and

c) sending the initial encrypted signal to the last authenticated one of the plurality of remote control devices upon expiration of the wait time

9. The method as recited in claim 8, including the step of receiving a command prompt in response to the encrypted signal from the last authenticated one of the plurality of remote control devices.

10. The method as recited in claim 9, wherein the initial encrypted signal is calculated in parallel with the time for a response by any of the plurality of remote control devices.

11. The method as recited in claim 8, wherein the encrypted signal calculated in parallel corresponds only for use with the last authenticated one of the plurality of remote control devices.

12. The method as recited in claim 8, including the step of calculating a new encrypted signal after the wait period in response to receipt of a response signal from one of the plurality of remote control devices that is not the last authenticated one of the plurality of remote control devices.

13. The method as recited in claim 8, wherein the challenge transmission comprises a low frequency signal.

14. The method as recited in claim 8, wherein the response to the encrypted signal includes an encrypted radio frequency signal from the last authenticated one of the plurality of remote control devices.

15. The method as recited in claim 8 wherein the challenge transmission comprises 32 bits of information.