SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR A TRANSACTION VETTING SERVICE

• US 20080114670A1
• Filed: 11/14/2007
• Published: 05/15/2008
• Est. Priority Date: 11/14/2006
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: SGL Network Incorporated
• Original Assignee: SGL Network Incorporated
• Inventors: FRIESEN, Mark
• Application Number:
  US11/939,932
• Publication Number:
  US 20080114670A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 705/35
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 40/00 Finance; Insurance; Tax strategies; Processing of corporate or income taxes

Abstract

An embodiment relates generally to a method of processing a financial transaction. The method includes receiving a requested transaction, where the requested transaction is transferring a sum of money or other assets from an originator to a receiver. The method also includes applying a set of rules to the requested transaction to vet the requested transaction, where the set of rules define the regulatory and legal compliance rules for the governing jurisdictions of the originator and receiver for a legal transaction. The method further includes obtaining a result from the application of the set of rules and approving the requested transaction in response to the result being passing all requirements of the set of rules.

Claims

1. A method of processing a financial transaction, the method comprising:

receiving a requested transaction, wherein the requested transaction is transferring a sum of money or other assets from an originator to a receiver;

applying a set of rules to the requested transaction to vet the requested transaction, wherein the set of rules define the regulatory and legal compliance rules for the governing jurisdictions of the originator and receiver for a legal transaction;

obtaining a result from the application of the set of rules; and

approving the requested transaction in response to the result being passing all requirements of the set of rules.

2. The method of claim 1, the method further comprising:

approving the transaction in response to the result being a suspicious transaction; and

notifying a governing government authority that the requested transaction is suspicious.

3. The method of claim 1, the method further comprising:

approving the transaction in response to the result being passing requirements of the set of rules; and

notifying a governing government authority of the requested transaction as required by a rule in the set of rules.

4. The method of claim 1, the method further comprising placing a hold on the requested transaction in response to a result being that additional information is required.

5. The method of claim 1, the method further comprising placing a hold the requested transaction until at least one subsequent event occurs.

6. The method of claim 5, the method further comprising modifying the sum of money or other assets in response to the occurrence of the at least one subsequent event.

7. The method of claim 5, the method further comprising modifying the receiver to a second receiver.

8. The method of claim 1, further comprising transmitting a stop transaction message in response to a violation of the set of rules, wherein the stop transaction message describes a reason for the stop transaction message.

9. The method of claim 8, further comprising notifying any governing government authorities of the stop transaction message and the requested transaction.

10. A system for processing a financial transaction, the system comprising:

a network configured to provide communication services;

a plurality of financial institutions coupled to the network; and

a transaction vetting service coupled to the network, wherein the transaction vetting service is configured to receive a requested transaction from a first financial institution to a second financial institution from the plurality of financial institutions;

to apply a set of rules to the requested transaction to vet the requested transaction;

to obtain a result from the application of the set of rules; and

to approve the requested transaction in response to the result being passing all requirements of the set of rules.

11. The system of claim 10, wherein the transaction vetting service is further configured to approve the requested transaction in response to the result being passing all requirements of the set of rules.

12. The system of claim 10, wherein the transaction vetting service is further configured to approve the transaction in response to the result being a suspicious transaction and to notify a governing authority that the requested transaction is suspicious.

13. The system of claim 10, wherein the transaction vetting service is further configured to approve the transaction in response to the result being passing requirements of the set of rules and to notify a governing authority of the requested transaction as required by a rule in the set of rules.

14. The system of claim 10, wherein the transaction vetting service is further configured to place a hold on the requested transaction in response to a result being that additional information is required.

15. The system of claim 10, wherein the transaction vetting service is further configured a hold the requested transaction until at least one subsequent event occurs.

16. The system of claim 15, wherein the transaction vetting service is further configured to modify an amount associated with the requested transaction in response to the occurrence of the at least one subsequent event.

17. The system of claim 15, wherein the transaction vetting service is further configured to modify a receiver associated with the requested transaction to a second receiver in response to the occurrence of the at least one subsequent event.

18. The system of claim 10, wherein the transaction vetting service is further configured to transmit a stop transaction message in response to a violation of the set of rules, wherein the stop transaction message describes a reason for the stop transaction message.

19. The system of claim 18, wherein the transaction vetting service is further configured notifying any governing government authorities of the stop transaction message and the requested transaction.

22. The apparatus of claim 18, wherein the transaction vetting service is further configured to approve the transaction in response to the result being a suspicious transaction and to notify a governing authority that the requested transaction is suspicious.

20. An apparatus for vetting transactions, the apparatus comprising:

an interface module configured to couple with a communication medium;

an internal database configured to store verification information;

a rules database configured to store a plurality of rules, each rule specifying at least one condition for a legal transfer of money or other assets between financial institutions; and

a vetting processor configured to receive a requested transaction from a first financial institution to a second financial institution;

to apply a set of rules from the rules database;

to obtain a result from the application of the set of rules; and

to approve the requested transaction in response to the result being passing all requirements of the set of rules.

21. The apparatus of claim 20, wherein the transaction vetting service is further configured to approve the requested transaction in response to the result being passing all requirements of the set of rules.

23. The apparatus of claim 20, wherein the transaction vetting service is further configured to approve the transaction in response to the result being passing requirements of the set of rules and to notify a governing authority of the requested transaction as required by a rule in the set of rules.

24. The apparatus of claim 20, wherein the transaction vetting service is further configured to place a hold on the requested transaction in response to a result being that additional information is required.

25. The apparatus of claim 20, wherein the transaction vetting service is further configured a hold the requested transaction until at least one subsequent event occurs.

26. The system of claim 20, wherein the transaction vetting service is further configured to modify an amount associated with the requested transaction in response to the occurrence of the at least one subsequent event.

27. The system of claim 20, wherein the transaction vetting service is further configured to modify a receiver associated with the requested transaction to a second receiver in response to the occurrence of the at least one subsequent event.

28. The apparatus of claim 20, wherein the transaction vetting service is further configured to transmit a stop transaction message in response to a violation of the set of rules, wherein the stop transaction message describes a reason for the stop transaction message.