System and a Method for Automatic Management of Quality Assurance Tests

• US 20080126288A1
• Filed: 09/21/2006
• Published: 05/29/2008
• Est. Priority Date: 09/21/2006
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Vitaly Krawetzky
• Original Assignee: Vitaly Krawetzky
• Inventors: Krawetzky, Vitaly
• Application Number:
  US11/533,800
• Publication Number:
  US 20080126288A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 706/50
• CPC Class Codes: G06N 5/045 Explanation of inference; Explainable artificial intelligence [XAI]; Interpretable artificial intelligence
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/10 Office automation; Time management

Abstract

The disclosed system and method automate the decision making abilities of quality assurance (QA) management tools. The proposed invention manages the decision making processes during runtime of the testing tools of any given QA system and provides a solution for automating this process. According to some embodiments the present invention is a decision management platform which controls the activity and the flows of operation of the QA tools. The decision management platform is a decision driven mechanism which analyzes the decision making process performed by the operators of the QA system and automatically provides a decision whenever similar conditions occur. According to preferred embodiments the solution serves both the automatic testing tools and the knowledge management tools. This solution significantly reduces maintenance over testing scenarios and allows a more effective usage of given resources in QA workflow.

Claims

1. A method of running an automatic quality assurance workflow of testing procedures through a real-time process, said method comprises the steps of:

identifying a decision point;

analyzing the current decision point in accordance with decision tree, wherein said decision tree is a structural database representing logical connections between previous decisions;

selecting and recording at least one conclusion of said decision.

2. The method of claim 1 wherein at recognized decision points the actions are taken according to recorded user specifications.

3. The method of claim 2 wherein at unrecognized decision points further comprising the step of triggering the user to select a conclusion for said unrecognized decision point.

4. The method of claim 1 further comprising the step of performing unconditional activities of testing procedures.

5. The method of claim 4 wherein unconditional activities include at least one of the following:

running stress tests, initiating performance data measurements, executing third party tool functionality or ready third party test scripts, executing any available workflow.

6. The method of claim 1 further comprising the step of performing unconditional tests for collecting data required for the process of decision making.

7. The method of claim 6 wherein at least part of the activities are processed before the tests.

8. The method of claim 6 wherein at least part of the tests are processed before the activities.

9. The method of claim 1 wherein a conclusion of decision includes a link to another decision point in the decision tree.

10. The method of claim 1 wherein a conclusion of a decision includes activating a specific test.

11. The method of claim 1 wherein the decision tree is composed of all the available decision points of all test scenarios and the relations between them.

12. The method of claim 1 further comprising the step of creating a connection point between two decision points having similar data concerning its tests and actions.

13. The method of claim 11 further comprising the step of applying conclusions of one decision point to another decision point wherein both decision points have common data.

14. The method of claim 1 further comprising the step of retrieving decision points in accordance with a given criteria.

15. A system for running an automatic quality assurance workflow of testing procedures through real-time process, said system comprises:

a monitoring module for identifying decision points;

a decision tree structural database representing logical connections between existing decisions;

processing module for analyzing the current decision point in accordance with said decision tree;

conclusions database enabling the recording of at least one selected conclusion of the decision.

16. The system of claim 15 wherein at recognized decision points the actions are taken according to recorded user decisions.

17. The system of claim 15 wherein at unrecognized decision points further comprising a triggering module enabling the user to select a conclusion for the unrecognized decision point.

18. The system of claim 15 further comprising a module for performing unconditional activities of testing procedures.

19. The system of claim 18 wherein unconditional activities include at least one of the following:

running stress tests, initiating performance data measurements, executing third party tool functionality or ready third party test scripts, executing any available workflow.

20. The system of claim 15 further comprising the a module for performing unconditional tests for collecting data required for the process of decision making.

21. The system of claim 15 wherein a conclusion of a decision includes a link to another decision point in the decision tree.

22. The system of claim 15 wherein a conclusion of a decision includes activating a specific test.

23. The system of claim 15 wherein the decision tree is composed of all the available decision points of all test scenarios and the relations between them.

24. The system of claim 15 wherein the process module further creates a connection between two decision points having similar data concerning its tests and actions.

25. The system of claim 24 wherein the process module further applies conclusions of one decision point to another decision point wherein both decision points have common data.

26. The system of claim 15 further comprising a query module for retrieving decision points in accordance with a given criteria.