BIRD IDENTIFICATION SYSTEM

• US 20080133592A1
• Filed: 11/30/2006
• Published: 06/05/2008
• Est. Priority Date: 11/30/2006
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: James Peters
• Original Assignee: James Peters
• Inventors: Peters, James
• Application Number:
  US11/565,329
• Publication Number:
  US 20080133592A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 707/104.1
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 16/532 Query formulation, e.g. graphical querying
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 16/5838 using colour
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 16/904 Browsing; Visualisation therefor for navigating the web G06F16/954; browsing optimisation for the web G06F16/957

Abstract

A flora and fauna identification apparatus includes a flora and fauna database that has a plurality of records. Each record has a color representation of a particular flora or fauna, along with a plurality of fields of identification criterion including physical topography and coloration of selected regions of the physical topography. A processor that selects records that are possible matches from the database based upon input of identification criterion by a user through a user interface. The user interface has a physical topography selector from which the user selects, a selected physical topography most closely resembling a flora or fauna to be identified. There is also provided a pallet of colors, from which the user sequentially selects colors and places the colors on selected regions of the selected physical topography. The processor determines at each step the records in the database that are possible flora or fauna matches.

Claims

1. A flora and fauna identification apparatus, comprising:

a flora and fauna database having a plurality of records, each record having a color representation of a particular flora or fauna, along with a plurality of fields of identification criterion including physical topography and coloration of selected regions of the physical topography;

a user interface;

a processor that selects records that are possible matches from the database based upon input of identification criterion by a user through the user interface;

the user interface having;

a physical topography selector from which the user selects, from a plurality of possible physical topographies, a selected physical topography most closely resembling a flora or fauna to be identified, the processor determining the records in the database that are possible matches based upon the selected physical topography; and

a pallet of colors, from which the user sequentially selects colors and places the colors on selected regions of the selected physical topography, the processor determining the records in the database that are possible flora or fauna matches as each color is added and placed on the selected region of the physical topography template.

2. The flora and fauna identification apparatus of claim 1, wherein the flora and fauna, is selected from one of birds, flowers, butterflies, frogs, snakes, spiders, fish, trees, or rocks.

3. The flora and fauna identification apparatus of claim 1, wherein the identification criterion includes geographical location based upon migratory patterns and the user interface allows the user to input the geographical location and time of year of the sighting.

4. The flora and fauna identification apparatus of claim 1, wherein records that are possible matches are ranked and an error in the selected region in which a color is placed affects a ranking of a record but does not eliminate the record as a possible match.

5. The flora and fauna identification apparatus of claim 1, wherein the identification criterion includes distinctive physical features and the user interface enables the user to allows the user to select, from several physical features, a selected physical feature.

6. The flora and fauna identification apparatus of claim 1, wherein the identification criterion includes texture and the user interface allows the user to select, from a plurality of possible textures, a selected texture.

7. The flora and fauna identification apparatus of claim 1, wherein the identification criterion includes observed natural habitat and the user interface allows the user to select, from a plurality of possible natural habitat, a selected habitat.

8. The flora and fauna identification apparatus of claim 1, wherein records that are possible matches are ranked and an error in user input when making selection from the identification criterion effects a ranking of a record but does not eliminate the record as a possible match.

9. The flora and fauna identification apparatus of claim 1, wherein the identification criterion includes a relative size ranking, and the user interface allows the user to select, from several relative size rankings, a selected relative size ranking.

10. The flora and fauna identification apparatus of claim 1, wherein the identification criterion includes a behaviour criterion, and the user interface allows the user to select, from several behaviours, a selected behaviour.

11. The flora and fauna identification apparatus of claim 1, wherein the identification criterion includes a movement criterion regarding movement on land, air or water, and the user interface allows the user to select, from several movement criterion, a selected movement criterion.

12. A method of identifying flora and fauna comprising:

providing a flora and fauna database having a plurality of records, each record having a plurality of fields of identification criterion including physical topography and coloration of selected regions of the physical topography;

providing a user interface;

providing a processor that selects records that are possible matches from the database based upon input of identification criterion by a user through the user interface;

using the user interface;

selecting a physical topography from a plurality of possible physical topographies, the selected physical topography most closely resembling a flora or fauna to be identified,

having the processor determine the records in the database that are possible matches based upon the selected physical topography; and

selecting a color from a pallet of colors placing the color on a selected region of the selected physical topography,

having the processor determine the records in the database that are possible flora or fauna matches as each color is added and placed on the selected region of the physical topography template.

13. The method of claim 12, wherein the flora and fauna is one of birds, flowers, butterflies, frogs, snakes, spiders, fish, trees, or rocks.

14. The method of claim 12, wherein the identification criterion includes geographical location based upon migratory patterns and the method further comprises the steps of inputting the geographical location and time of year of the sighting.

15. The method of claim 12, further comprising the step of having the processor rank records that are possible matches are ranked, wherein an error in the selected region in which a color is placed affects a ranking of a record but does not eliminate the record as a possible match.

16. The method of claim 12, wherein the identification criterion includes distinctive physical features and the user interface enables the user to allows the user to select, from several physical features, a selected physical feature.

17. The method of claim 12, wherein the identification criterion includes texture and the method further comprises the step of selecting, from a plurality of possible textures, a selected texture.

18. The method of claim 12, wherein the identification criterion includes observed natural habitat and the method further comprises the step of selecting, from a plurality of possible natural habitat, a selected habitat.

19. The method of claim 12, further comprising the step of having the processor rank records that are possible matches are ranked, wherein an error in user input when making selection from the identification criterion effects a ranking of a record but does not eliminate the record as a possible match.

20. The method of claim 12, wherein the identification criterion includes a relative size ranking, and the method further comprises the step of selecting, from several relative size rankings, a selected relative size ranking.

21. The method of claim 12, wherein the identification criterion includes a behaviour criterion, and the user interface allows the user to select, from several behaviours, a selected behaviour.

22. The method of claim 12, wherein the identification criterion includes a movement pattern criterion regarding movement on land, in the air or on water, and the user interface allows the user to select, from several movement pattern criterion, a selected movement pattern criterion.