SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DETERMINING LIKE-MINDEDNESS

• US 20080144882A1
• Filed: 04/05/2007
• Published: 06/19/2008
• Est. Priority Date: 12/19/2006
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Mind Metrics, LLC
• Original Assignee: Mind Metrics, LLC
• Inventors: Miller, Alan T., Leinbach, Kurt
• Application Number:
  US11/697,009
• Publication Number:
  US 20080144882A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 382/100
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 30/02 Marketing; Price estimation or determination; Fundraising

Abstract

Methods and apparatus for a participant response system according to various aspects of the present invention operate in conjunction with an information system and an assessment system. The information system may store selection information in response to a first participant'"'"'s selection of images from a set of candidate images. The assessment system is responsive to the information system, identifies a correlation between the selection information of the first participant and a set of comparison data.

Claims

1. A participant response system for use by multiple participants, comprising:

an information system configured to store selection information in response to a first participant'"'"'s selection of images from a set of candidate images;

an assessment system responsive to the information system, wherein the assessment system is configured to identify a correlation between the selection information of the first participant and a set of comparison data; and

an output system responsive to the assessment system and configured to generate an output report corresponding to the identified correlation.

2. A participant response system according to claim 1, wherein the information system is further configured to provide the set of candidate images to the first participant.

3. A participant response system according to claim 1, wherein the comparison data comprises selection information corresponding to other participants'"'"' selection of images from the set of candidate images.

4. A participant response system according to claim 3, wherein the output report further includes information relating to at least one other participant whose selection information exhibits the correlation to the selection information of the first participant.

5. A participant response system according to claim 1, wherein the comparison data comprises historical data associated with a habit-of-thought category.

6. A participant response system according to claim 1, wherein the information system, the assessment system, and the output system are implemented by a computer program operating on a main computer.

7. A participant response system according to claim 6, wherein the main computer is connected to a remote computer configured to be used by the participant, and wherein the main computer and the remote computer are connected via a network.

8. A participant response system for use by multiple participants, comprising:

an image interface configured to present multiple candidate images without associated text to the multiple participants;

a selection interface responsive to the image interface, wherein the selection interface is configured to receive selection information for each participant corresponding to a set of selected images selected by each participant from the candidate images;

a memory responsive to the selection interface and configured to store the selection information;

an assessment system coupled to the memory, wherein the assessment system is configured to identify correlations between selection information of different participants and a set of comparison data; and

an output system responsive to the assessment system, wherein the output system is configured to report a result according to the identified correlations.

9. A participant response system according to claim 8, wherein the image interface is configured to provide the set of candidate images to the first participant in sets of two simultaneously presented candidate images.

10. A participant response system according to claim 8, wherein the comparison data comprises selection information corresponding to other participants'"'"' selection of images from the set of candidate images.

11. A participant response system according to claim 10, wherein the output system is further configured to report information relating to at least one participant whose selection information exhibits the correlation to the selection information of another participant.

12. A participant response system according to claim 8, wherein the comparison data comprises historical data associated with a habit-of-thought category.

13. A participant response system according to claim 8, wherein the image interface, the selection interface, the assessment system, and the output system are implemented by a computer program operating on a main computer.

14. A participant response system according to claim 13, wherein the main computer is connected to a remote computer configured to be used by at least one participant, and wherein the main computer and the remote computer are connected via a network.

15. A computer-implemented method for analyzing information from a participant, comprising:

presenting a set of candidate images to the participant via an image interface;

receiving selection information from the participant, wherein the selection information comprises data corresponding to a set of selected images selected by the participant from the candidate images;

identifying correlations between the selection information of the participant and a set of comparison data; and

generating an output report according to the identified correlations.

16. A method according to claim 15, wherein the comparison data comprises selection information corresponding to other participants'"'"' selection of images from the set of candidate images.

17. A method according to claim 16, wherein generating the output report further includes providing information relating to at least one other participant whose selection information exhibits at least one of the identified correlations to the selection information of the first participant in the output report.

18. A method according to claim 15, wherein the comparison data comprises historical data associated with a habit-of-thought category.

19. A method according to claim 18, wherein generating the output report includes providing an identification of the habit-of-thought category in the output report.

20. A method according to claim 15, further comprising:

quantifying the correlation between the selection information of the participant and the set of comparison data to generate a quantification figure; and

providing the quantification figure in the output report.