System and Method of Ranking Tabular Data

• US 20080168091A1
• Filed: 01/10/2007
• Published: 07/10/2008
• Est. Priority Date: 01/10/2007
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: GraphWise LLC
• Original Assignee: GraphWise LLC
• Inventors: Young, Paul K., Quinn-Jacobs, David
• Application Number:
  US11/621,784
• Publication Number:
  US 20080168091A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 707/104.1
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 40/177 of tables; using ruled lines
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 40/226 Validation

Abstract

A method for ranking the quality of a set of tabular data includes determining one or more quality metrics corresponding to a set of tabular data. The quality metrics are combined to form a quality score for the set of tabular data.

Claims

1. A method for creating a quality score for a set of tabular data, said method comprising:

(a) determining one or more quality metrics corresponding to said set of tabular data; and

(b) combining said quality metrics to create a quality score for said set of tabular data.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein each of said one or more quality metrics comprises a value between and including 0 and 1.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein said determining step comprises applying one or more rules to said set of tabular data.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein at least one of said quality metrics is determined by multiplying one or more submetrics by corresponding weighting factors and adding the products of said multiplications.

5. The method of claim 1, wherein said combining step comprises multiplying said quality metrics by corresponding weighting factors and adding the products of said multiplications.

6. The method of claim 1, wherein said set of tabular data includes plot data.

7. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

(c) obtaining said set of tabular data from sources on a computer network.

8. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

(c) obtaining said set of tabular data from a single computer.

9. The method of claim 1, wherein at least one of said quality metrics is a table quality metric.

10. The method of claim 9, wherein said table quality metric is based at least on one or more submetrics, said submetrics selected from the group consisting of density, completeness of metadata, consistency and size.

11. The method of claim 1, wherein at least one of said quality metrics is a source quality metric.

12. The method of claim 11, wherein said set of tabular data has a source, and wherein said source quality metric is based at least on one or more submetrics, said submetrics selected from the group consisting of page quality, domain quality, source bias, source accuracy and peer review.

13. The method of claim 1, wherein at least one of said quality metrics is a user evaluation metric.

14. The method of claim 13, wherein said user evaluation quality metric is based at least on one or more submetrics, said submetrics selected from the group consisting of utility, density, data bias, completeness of metadata, relevance and data accuracy.

15. The method of claim 1, wherein at least one of said quality metrics is a usage metric.

16. The method of claim 15, wherein said usage metric is based at least on one or more submetrics, said submetrics selected from the group consisting of views and uses.

17. An article of manufacture for creating a quality score for a set of tabular data, the article of manufacture comprising a machine-readable medium holding machine-executable instructions for performing a method comprising:

(a) determining one or more quality metrics corresponding to said set of tabular data; and

(b) combining said quality metrics to create a quality score for said set of tabular data.

18. The article of manufacture of claim 17, wherein each of said one or more quality metrics comprises a value between and including 0 and 1.

19. The article of manufacture of claim 17, wherein said determining step of said method comprises applying one or more rules to said set of tabular data.

20. The article of manufacture of claim 17, wherein said determining step of said method comprises multiplying one or more submetrics by corresponding weighting factors and adding the products of said multiplications.

21. The article of manufacture of claim 17, wherein said combining step of said method comprises multiplying said quality metrics by corresponding weighting factors and adding the products of said multiplications.

22. A system for creating a quality score for a set of tabular data, said system comprising:

(a) an input interface for receiving said set of tabular data;

(b) a processor for determining one or more quality metrics corresponding to said set of tabular data and combining said quality metrics to create a quality score for said set of tabular data; and

(c) a storage device for storing said quality score.

23. The system of claim 22, wherein each of said one or more quality metrics comprises a value between and including 0 and 1.

24. The system of claim 22, wherein said determining one or more quality metrics comprises applying one or more rules to said set of tabular data.

25. The system of claim 22, wherein said determining one or more quality metrics comprises multiplying one or more submetrics by corresponding weighting factors and adding the products of said multiplications.

26. The system of claim 22, wherein said combining said quality metrics comprises multiplying said quality metrics by corresponding weighting factors and adding the products of said multiplications.