METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR DESIGNING A FIBER-OPTIC NETWORK

• US 20080181609A1
• Filed: 01/26/2007
• Published: 07/31/2008
• Est. Priority Date: 01/26/2007
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: AT&T Knowledge Ventures, L.P. (AT&T, Inc.)
• Original Assignee: AT&T Knowledge Ventures, L.P. (AT&T, Inc.)
• Inventors: Ou, Canhui, Yi, Xiaochuan
• Application Number:
  US11/627,724
• Publication Number:
  US 20080181609A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 398/58
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 41/0803 Configuration setting
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 41/145 involving simulating, designing, planning or modelling of a network

Abstract

Methods and apparatus for designing a fiber-optic network are disclosed. An example apparatus comprises a memory to store a first list of available fibers between a plurality of nodes of a fiber-optic network and a second list of forecasted services for the plurality of nodes, and a network planner to recursively trace a network design tree to identify a preferable network design based on the first and the second lists.

Claims

1. An apparatus comprising:

a memory to store a first list of available fibers between a plurality of nodes of a fiber-optic network and a second list of forecasted services for the plurality of nodes; and

a network planner to recursively trace a network design tree to identify a preferable network design based on the first and the second lists.

2. An apparatus as defined in claim 1, wherein the network planner comprises:

a second memory to store a first network design and a presently preferred network design;

a network design comparer to compare the first network design to the presently preferred network design and to replace the presently preferred network design with the first network design when the first network design is potentially preferred to the presently preferred network design.

3. An apparatus as defined in claim 1, wherein the network planner comprises:

an intermediate office (IO) pair selector to select an IO pair from a list of candidate IO pairs; and

an IO placer adds the selected IO pair to a first network design to form a second network design when the first network design is potentially preferred to a presently preferred network design.

4. An apparatus as defined in claim 3, wherein the IO pair selector is to select a second IO pair from the list of candidate IO pairs, and the IO placer adds the second IO pair to the first network design to form a third network design when the second network design is not preferred to the first network design.

5. An apparatus as defined in claim 1, wherein the network planner comprises:

an intermediate office (IO) pair locator to determine a list of candidate IO pairs;

an IO placer to selectively add one or more IO pairs from the list of candidate IO pairs to a network design to recursively trace the network design tree.

6. An apparatus as defined in claim 5, wherein the network planner further comprises a second IO placer, wherein the IO placer is to recursively trace a first portion of the network design tree and the second IO placer is to recursively trace a second portion of the network design tree.

7. An apparatus as defined in claim 1, further comprising a timer, the network planner to recursively trace the network design tree until the timer expires.

8. An apparatus as defined in claim 6, further comprising a network design selector to compare a first network design identified by the IO placer and a second network design identified by the second IO placer.

9. An apparatus as defined in claim 6, wherein the IO placer is implemented by a first processor and the second IO placer is implemented by a second processor.

10. An apparatus as defined in claim 1, wherein a depth of the network design tree recursively traced by the network planner depends on a number of candidate IO node pairs.

11. A method of designing a communication network, the method comprising:

adding a first intermediate office (IO) node pair to a first network design to form a second network design;

adding a second IO node pair to the second network design to form a third network design when the second network design represents a potentially better solution than a previously preferred solution; and

adding a third IO node pair to the first network design to form a fourth network design when the second network design represents a worse solution than the previously preferred solution.

12. A method as defined in claim 11, wherein the communication network is a fiber-optic network for delivering digital video, digital voice, and high-speed data services.

13. A method as defined in claim 11, further comprising recursively tracing a network design tree to automatically add the second IO node pair to the second network design to form the third network design when the second network design represents a potentially better solution than the previously preferred solution.

14. A method as defined in claim 11, wherein the second network design represents a better solution than the previously preferred solution when the second network serves more service switches.

15. A method as defined in claim 11, wherein the second network design represents a better solution than the previously preferred solution when the second network serves more central offices.

16. A method as defined in claim 11, wherein the second network design represents a better solution than the previously preferred solution when the second network costs less.

17. A method as defined in claim 11, further comprising configuring the communication network to implement at least one of the previously preferred solution, the first network design, the second network design, the third network design or the fourth network design.

18. A method as defined in claim 11, further comprising:

adding a fourth IO node pair to the third network design when the third network design represents a potentially better solution than the second network design.

19. A method as defined in claim 18, further comprising adding a fifth node pair to the third network design when the third network design represents a worse solution than the second network design.

20. A method as defined in claim 11, wherein the second network design comprises:

the first IO node pair;

a first fiber connecting a video head-end (VHO) to a first one of the first IO node pair;

a second fiber connecting the VHO to a second one of the first IO node pair; and

a third fiber between the first one of the first IO node pair and a subtending central office; and

a fourth fiber between the second one of the first IO node pair and the subtending central office.

21. A method as defined in claim 20, wherein the first network design further comprises a fifth fiber between the first one and the second one of the first IO node pair.

22. A method as defined in claim 20, wherein the first, the second, the third and the fourth fibers are physically diverse.

23. A method as defined in claim 11, wherein a first one of the first IO node pair implements a multi-service edge router, wherein the multi-service edge router transports digital video signals between a video hub office (VHO) and a subtending central office (CO).

24. A method as defined in claim 11, further comprising:

calculating a list of candidate IO node pairs based on the first network design; and

selecting the first IO node pair from the list of candidate IO node pairs.

25. An article of manufacture storing machine readable instructions which, when executed, cause a machine to:

present a first interface that allows a user to provide a topology for a fiber-optic network;

present a second interface that allows the user to provide traffic forecast data; and

present a third interface that allows the user to initiate a recursive tracing of network design tree to select a design for the fiber-optic network.

26. An article of manufacture as defined in claim 25, wherein the machine readable instructions, when executed, cause the machine to:

choose an Intermediate Office (IO) node pair;

select a first fiber to connect a video head-end (VHO) to a first one of the IO node pair;

select a second fiber to connect the VHO to a second one of the IO node pair; and

select a third fiber between the first one of the IO node pair and a subtending central office (CO); and

select a fourth fiber between the second one of the IO node pair and the subtending CO.

27. An article of manufacture as defined in claim 26, wherein the machine readable instructions, when executed, cause the machine to select a fifth fiber between the first and the second ones of the IO node pair.

28. An article of manufacture as defined in claim 26, wherein the machine readable instructions, when executed, cause the machine to select the first, the second, the third and the fourth fibers to be physically diverse.

29. An article of manufacture as defined in claim 26, wherein the first one of the IO node pair implements a multi-service edge router, and wherein the multi-service edge router transports digital video signals between the VHO and the subtending CO.

30. An article of manufacture as defined in claim 26, wherein the machine readable instructions, when executed, cause the machine to select the IO node pair to reduce a number of unserved central offices.

31-42. -42. (canceled)