POLICY ENFORCEMENT OVER HETEROGENEOUS ASSETS

• US 20080183603A1
• Filed: 01/30/2007
• Published: 07/31/2008
• Est. Priority Date: 01/30/2007
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Agilence Incorporated
• Original Assignee: Agiliarice Incorporated
• Inventors: Soung, Yuh-Wen, Kothari, Pravin
• Application Number:
  US11/669,130
• Publication Number:
  US 20080183603A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 705/30
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/06 Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 40/12 Accounting
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 50/18 Legal services

Abstract

One policy can be enforced over heterogeneous assets by having connectors monitoring assets execute asset type related checks to enforce the policy. In one embodiment, the present invention includes receiving, at one such connector managing a plurality of assets, an assignment of a policy to an asset of the plurality of assets from a server. In response to the assignment, the connector attempts to retrieve one or more automated checks to enforce the policy against the asset using information about an asset type of the asset, and then executes the retrieved automated checks against the first asset if at least one automated check was retrieved.

Claims

1. A method comprising:

receiving, at a connector managing a plurality of assets, an assignment of a policy to a first asset of the plurality of assets from a server;

attempting to retrieve one or more automated checks to enforce the policy against the first asset using information about an asset type of the first asset; and

executing the retrieved automated checks against the first asset if at least one automated check was retrieved.

2. The method of claim 1, further comprising sending a message to the server to inform the server that no automated checks are available if the attempting to retrieve one of more automated checks is unsuccessful.

3. The method of claim 2, further comprising receiving the message at the server and deploying a manual check to enforce the policy against the first asset in response to the received message.

4. The method of claim 3, wherein deploying the manual check comprises sending a survey to be filled out by an owner of the first asset.

5. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

receiving, at a second connector managing a plurality of assets, an assignment of a policy to the first asset of the plurality of assets from the server;

attempting, by the second connector, to retrieve one or more second automated checks to execute the policy against the first asset using information about an asset type of the first asset; and

executing, by the second connector, the retrieved second automated checks against the first asset if at least one second automated check was retrieved.

6. The method of claim 5, further comprising receiving a first result of the automated checks from the first connector at the server, and receiving a second result of the second automated checks from the second connector at the server.

7. The method of claim 6, further comprising determining whether the first result is inconsistent with the second result.

8. The method of claim 7, further comprising selecting a high priority result from the first result and the second result.

9. The method of claim 8, wherein selecting the high priority result comprises selecting a high priority connector from the connector and the second connector.

10. A policy enforcement system comprising:

a connector database to relate a plurality of connectors monitoring a plurality of assets to the plurality of assets;

a policy engine to receive an assignment of a first policy to a first asset, to select one or more connectors monitoring the first asset using the connector database, and to push the first policy to the selected one or more connectors; and

a plurality of connectors to execute automated checks specific to asset types against assets, wherein the one or more selected connectors execute one or more automated checks to enforce the first policy against the first asset using information about an asset type of the first asset.

11. The policy enforcement system of claim 10, wherein the one or more selected connectors is further to inform the policy engine that no automated checks are available to enforce the first policy.

12. The policy enforcement system of claim 11, wherein the policy engine is further to deploy a manual check to enforce the first policy against the first asset in response to being informed by the one or more selected connectors about the unavailability of automated checks.

13. The policy enforcement system of claim 12, wherein the policy engine deploys a manual check by sending a survey to be completed by an owner of the first asset.

14. The policy enforcement system of claim 10, wherein the policy engine is further to receive results from the one or more selected connectors having executed the one or more automated checks to enforce the first policy against the first asset.

15. The policy enforcement system of claim 14, wherein the policy engine is farther to prioritize the received results received form the one or more selected connectors.

16. The policy enforcement system of claim 15, wherein the policy engine prioritizes the received results by comparing priorities of the one or more selected connectors using the connector database.

17. A machine-readable medium having stored thereon data representing instructions that, when executed by a processor, cause the processor to perform operations comprising:

receiving, at a connector managing a plurality of assets, an assignment of a policy to a first asset of the plurality of assets from a server;

attempting to retrieve one or more automated checks to enforce the policy against the first asset using information about an asset type of the first asset; and

executing the retrieved automated checks against the first asset if at least one automated check was retrieved.

18. The machine-readable medium of claim 17, wherein the instructions further cause the processor to send a message to the server to inform the server that no automated checks are available if the attempting to retrieve one of more automated checks is unsuccessful.

19. The machine-readable medium of claim 17, wherein the instruction further cause the processor to perform operations comprising:

receiving, at a second connector managing a plurality of assets, an assignment of a policy to the first asset of the plurality of assets from the server;

attempting, by the second connector, to retrieve one or more second automated checks to execute the policy against the first asset using information about an asset type of the first asset; and

executing, by the second connector, the retrieved second automated checks against the first asset if at least one second automated check was retrieved.