System and method for software development

• US 20080196000A1
• Filed: 02/14/2007
• Published: 08/14/2008
• Est. Priority Date: 02/14/2007
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: TopCoder, Inc. (Wipro Limited)
• Original Assignee: TopCoder, Inc. (Wipro Limited)
• Inventors: Hughes, John M., Messinger, David, Fernandez-lvern, Javier
• Application Number:
  US11/706,936
• Publication Number:
  US 20080196000A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 717/101
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 8/20 Software design
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 30/02 Marketing; Price estimation or determination; Fundraising

Abstract

This invention relates to a method and apparatus for developing software. In one embodiment, a method for facilitating the distributed development of software components includes conducting one or more contests for the development of computer software, and rewarding contest reviewers based on the performance of the software developed. Reviewers performance may be measured, for example, using a defect statistic associated with the reviewer.

Claims

1. A method for facilitating the distributed development of software programs comprising:

selecting software program reviewers from among a plurality of developers;

communicating specifications for a software program to a subset of the plurality of developers;

receiving at least one contest submission in response to the communicated specifications;

scoring by the selected reviewers the received submission;

identifying one of the at least one submissions as a winning submission;

tracking defects associated with the received submission; and

rewarding the selected reviewers based on the defects in the received submission.

2. The method of claim 1 wherein the developers are rated based on the results of a coding competition.

3. The method of claim 1 wherein the specifications are for the design of a software program.

4. The method of claim 1 wherein the specifications are for the development of a software program.

5. The method of claim 1 wherein the software program is a software component.

6. The method of claim 1 wherein the software program is selected from the group of software programs comprising:

a software component, a software application, a combination of software components, or a software module.

7. The method of claim 1, wherein the reward is rewarded based on a personal defect statistic.

8. The method of claim 7, wherein the personal defect statistic comprises defects per component.

9. The method of claim 7, wherein the personal defect statistic comprises defects per thousand lines of code.

10. The method of claim 1, wherein the reviewers are selected by conducting an auction among qualified developers.

11. A method for facilitating the distributed development of software programs comprising:

conducting an auction for selection of software program reviewers;

communicating first specifications for a software program design to a subset of the plurality of developers;

receiving at least one contest submission in response to the first communicated specifications;

scoring by reviewers the received design submission;

identifying one of the at least one submissions as a winning design submission;

communicating second specifications for software code to a subset of the plurality of developers;

receiving at least one contest submission in response to the second communicated specifications;

scoring by the reviewers selected the received software code submission;

identifying one of the at least one software code submissions as a winning software code submission;

tracking defects associated with the winning software code submission; and

rewarding the reviewers selected as auction winners based on the defects in the winning software code submission.

12. The method of claim 11 wherein developers are rated based on the results of a coding competition.

13. The method of claim 11 wherein the software program is a software component.

14. The method of claim 11 wherein the software program is selected from the group of software programs comprising:

a software component, a software application, a combination of software components, or a software module.

15. The method of claim 11, wherein the reward is rewarded based on a defect statistic associated with the reviewer.

16. The method of claim 15, wherein the defect statistic comprises defects per component.

17. The method of claim 15, wherein the defect statistic comprises defects per lines of code.

18. A system for facilitating the distributed development of software programs comprising:

a selector for selecting software program reviewers from among a plurality of developers;

a communication system for communicating specifications for a software program to a subset of the plurality of developers;

a receiving system for receiving at least one contest submission in response to the communicated specifications;

a scoring system for scoring by the selected reviewers the received submission;

an identification system for identifying one of the at least one submissions as a winning submission;

a defect tracking system for tracking defects associated with the received submission; and

a reward system for rewarding the selected reviewers based on the defects in the received submission.

19. The system of claim 18, wherein the reward system comprises a system for maintaining a defect statistic associated with a reviewer.

20. The method of claim 19, wherein the defect statistic comprises defects per lines of code reviewed.