Apparatus for airfield management

• US 20080201024A1
• Filed: 09/04/2007
• Published: 08/21/2008
• Est. Priority Date: 09/03/2006
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Karl F. Milde Jr
• Original Assignee: Karl F. Milde Jr
• Inventors: Matos, Jeffrey A.
• Granted Patent: US 7,991,516 B2
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 701/2
• CPC Class Codes: G05D 1/0011 associated with a remote control arrangement
• CPC Class Codes: G08G 5/0026 located on the ground
• CPC Class Codes: G08G 5/0082 for monitoring traffic from a ground station radar or analogous systems specially adapted for traffic control G01S13/91

Abstract

A system for supervising the landing of an aircraft by a supervisor in a control station, each of the aircraft being incapable of being controlled by any personnel onboard, the system comprises a control station and onboard aircraft control apparatus. The station includes an input device, responsive to the supervisor, for producing a control signal for controlling the landing of the aircraft; and a transmitting device, coupled to the input device, for communication with the aircraft. The aircraft apparatus includes a receiving device for communication with the station; a logic device, coupled to the receiving device, for controlling the aircraft which is programmed to pilot the aircraft to the vicinity of the airfield. The control signal is selected by the supervisor, based on the supervisor'"'"'s observations of the aircraft and is transmitted to the logic device; in response thereto, the logic device controls the aircraft.

Claims

1. A system for supervising the landing of a plurality of aircraft at a given airfield by a human supervisor in a control station, each of said aircraft being incapable of being controlled by any human personnel on board, said system comprising, in combination:

(a) a control station comprising;

(1) at least one input device, responsive to said supervisor, for producing at least one control signal for controlling the landing of said aircraft; and

(2) a transmitting device, coupled to said at least one input device, for electronic communication with each of a plurality of aircraft; and

(b) aircraft control apparatus disposed on each of a plurality of aircraft, each said apparatus including;

(1) a receiving device for electronic communication with said transmitting device of said control station;

(2) at least one logic device, coupled to said receiving device, for controlling said aircraft by controlling at least one of the movable aerodynamic control surfaces of the aircraft, throttles, landing gear, and brakes, said logic device being programmed to pilot said aircraft to the vicinity of said airfield and thereafter to automatically land said aircraft at said airfield;

whereby (1) said at least one control signal is selected by said supervisor, based on said supervisor'"'"'s observations of said plurality of aircraft;

(2) said control signal is transmitted from said control station to said logic device; and

(3) in response thereto, said logic device controls the respective aircraft, thereby to control its flight in the vicinity of an airfield.

2. The system defined in claim 1, wherein said logic device includes at least one of:

a) an autopilot aboard said aircraft;

b) a flight management computer aboard said aircraft.

3. The system defined in claim 1, wherein one of said at least one logic device is further operative to prevent control of the aircraft by any person onboard the aircraft in the event of a hijacking.

4. The system defined in claim 1, wherein at least one of said aircraft is unmanned.

5. The system defined in claim 1, further comprising:

a) at least one telemetry device aboard the aircraft, for producing a telemetry output;

b) a transmitter aboard the aircraft, coupled to the at least one telemetry device, for transmitting the telemetry output;

c) a receiver at the control station for receiving the telemetry output; and

d) a display device at the control station, coupled to the receiver, for displaying the telemetry output.

6. The system defined in claim 5, wherein said telemetry device includes at least one of:

i) an aircraft identification generating device;

ii) a fuel-remaining sensor; and

iii) a GPS;

wherein said telemetry output may be used for at least one of;

aircraft identification, and the calculation of remaining fuel safety margin for said aircraft.

7. The system defined in claim 1, wherein said control signal is a landing inhibit command, whereby said command causes said logic device to postpone the landing of said aircraft.

8. The system defined in claim 7, where said postponement causes said aircraft to move in a pre-defined orbit in the vicinity of the airfield.

9. The system defined in claim 7, where said postponement causes said aircraft to move in one of a plurality of pre-defined orbits in the vicinity of the airfield, said orbit selected by said supervisor.

10. The system defined in claim 9, wherein said control signal represents a command which changes the aircraft motion from one predefined orbit to another.

11. The system defined in claim 1, wherein said control signal represents a command which causes said aircraft to approach the airfield along one of a plurality of pre-defined approach vectors.

12. The system defined in claim 1, wherein said control signal represents a command which causes said aircraft to land on one of a plurality of runways.

13. The system defined in claim 1, wherein said control signal represents a command which causes said aircraft to land at a particular time.

14. The system defined in claim 1, wherein said control signal represents a landing confirmation command which causes said logic device to enable landing instructions previously inputted to at least one said logic device, thereby to cause the landing of said aircraft.

15. The system defined in claim 1, further comprising:

a) at least one landing parameter logic device aboard the aircraft, for storing landing parameter information;

b) a transmitter aboard the aircraft, coupled to said at least one landing parameter logic device, for transmitting said landing parameter information;

c) a receiver at the control station for receiving said landing parameter information; and

d) a display device at the control station, coupled to the receiver, for displaying at least some of said landing parameter information.

16. The system defined in claim 15, wherein said control signal represents a landing inhibit command which causes said logic device to postpone the landing of said aircraft.

17. The system defined in claim 15, wherein said landing parameter information includes at least one of:

(1) airport identity;

(2) airport location;

(3) airport approach vector;

(4) airport runway assignment; and

(5) airport holding orbit.

18. The system defined in claim 15, wherein said control signal represents a command which causes said aircraft to change its approach to the airfield from a pre-assigned approach vector to one of a plurality of possible alternate approach vectors.

19. The system defined in claim 15, wherein said control signal represents a command which causes said aircraft to change its runway choice from a pre-assigned runway to one of a plurality of possible alternate runways.

20. The system defined in claim 15, wherein said control signal represents a command which causes said aircraft to change its landing time to another landing time.

21. The system defined in claim 15, wherein said control signal represents a landing confirmation command, whereby said command causes said logic device to initiate the landing of said aircraft.

22. The system defined in claim 1, wherein said control signal represents a command which causes said aircraft to traverse a particular taxiway on the ground.

23. The system defined in claim 1, wherein at least one of said aircraft is controllable by at least one alternate pilot, said alternate pilot selected from the group consisting of (i) at least one autopilot;

(ii) at least one flight management computer, and (iii) a human pilot remote from said aircraft.

24. The system defined in claim 23, further comprising a remote pilot transmitting device, whereby said remote pilot may communicate with said logic device for control of said aircraft.

25. The system defined in claim 23, wherein each of said at least one autopilot and said at least one flight management computer is coupled to a respective one of said at least one logic device.

26. The system defined in claim 23, wherein said logic device is operative to receive signals from said supervisor to override the control signals of said alternate pilot.

27. A system for supervising the landing of a plurality of aircraft at a given airfield by a control device in a control station, each of said aircraft being incapable of being controlled by any human personnel on board, said system comprising, in combination:

(a) a control station comprising;

(1) a first transmitting/receiving (T/R) device for electronic communication with each of a plurality of aircraft; and

(2) at least one first logic device, coupled to said first T/R device, for analysis of received aircraft information, for the computation of prioritizing information for aircraft landing, and for the generation of landing commands based on said prioritizing information; and

(b) aircraft control apparatus disposed on each of a plurality of aircraft, each said apparatus including;

(1) a second T/R device for electronic communication with said first T/R device of said control station;

(2) at least one second logic device, coupled to the second T/R device, for controlling the landing of said aircraft by controlling at least one of the movable aerodynamic surfaces of the aircraft, throttles, landing gear and brakes, said logic device being programmed to pilot said aircraft to the vicinity of said airfield and thereafter to land said aircraft at said airfield; and

(3) at least one telemetry device, coupled to the second T/R device, for obtaining information about said aircraft required for landing prioritization;

whereby (1) said telemetry information is transmitted from a plurality of aircraft needing to land;

(2) information is received at said control station and processed by said at least one first logic device;

(3) said at least one first logic device generates a landing sequence for said plurality of aircraft based on said information;

(4) based on said landing sequence, said at least one first logic device generates landing commands for each of said aircraft; and

(5) said landing commands are transmitted from said first T/R device to said respective second T/R devices on said aircraft;

(6) in response thereto, said respective at least one second logic device controls the respective aircraft,

thereby to control the landing sequence in the vicinity of an airfield.

28. The system defined in claim 27, wherein said second logic device includes at least one of:

a) an autopilot aboard said aircraft;

b) a flight management computer aboard said aircraft.

29. The system defined in claim 27, wherein said second logic device is further operative to prevent control of the aircraft by any person onboard the aircraft in the event of a hijacking.

30. The system defined in claim 27, wherein at least one of said aircraft is unmanned.

31. The system defined in claim 27, wherein said telemetry device includes at least one of:

i) an aircraft identification generating device;

ii) a fuel-remaining sensor; and

iii) a GPS;

wherein said telemetry output may be used for at least one of;

aircraft identification and the calculation of remaining fuel safety margin for said aircraft.

32. The system defined in claim 27, wherein at least one of said landing commands is a landing inhibit command, whereby said command causes said second logic device to postpone the landing of said aircraft.

33. The system defined in claim 32, where said postponement causes said aircraft to move in a pre-defined orbit in the vicinity of the airfield.

34. The system defined in claim 32, where said postponement causes said aircraft to move in one of a plurality of pre-defined orbits in the vicinity of the airfield, said orbit selected by said first logic device.

35. The system defined in claim 34, wherein said first logic device may send a command which changes the aircraft motion from one predefined orbit to another.

36. The system defined in claim 27, wherein said first logic device may send a command which causes said aircraft to approach the airfield along one of a plurality of pre-defined approach vectors.

37. The system defined in claim 27, wherein at least one of said landing commands causes said aircraft to land on one of a plurality of runways.

38. The system defined in claim 27, wherein at least one of said landing commands causes said aircraft to land at a particular time.

39. The system defined in claim 27, wherein at least one of said landing commands is a landing confirmation command, whereby said command causes said second logic device to initiate the landing of said aircraft.

40. The system defined in claim 27, further comprising at least one landing parameter logic device aboard the aircraft, for storing landing parameter information.

41. The system defined in claim 40, wherein at least one of said landing commands is a landing inhibit command which causes said second logic device to postpone the landing of said aircraft.

42. The system defined in claim 40, wherein said landing parameter information includes at least one of:

(1) airport identity;

(2) airport location;

(3) airport approach vector;

(4) airport runway assignment; and

(5) airport holding orbit.

43. The system defined in claim 40, wherein at least one of said landing commands causes said aircraft to change its approach to the airfield from a pre-assigned approach vector to one of a plurality of possible alternate approach vectors.

44. The system defined in claim 40, wherein at least one of said landing commands causes said aircraft to change its runway choice from a pre-assigned runway to one of a plurality of possible alternate runways.

45. The system defined in claim 40, wherein at least one of said landing commands causes said aircraft to change its landing time to another landing time.

46. The system defined in claim 40, wherein at least one of said landing commands represents a landing confirmation command, whereby said command causes said second logic device to initiate the landing of said aircraft.

47. The system defined in claim 27, wherein at least one of said landing commands causes said aircraft to traverse a particular taxiway on the ground.

48. The system defined in claim 27, wherein at least one of said aircraft is controllable by at least one alternate pilot, said alternate pilot selected from the group consisting of (i) at least one autopilot;

(ii) at least one flight management computer, and (iii) a human pilot remote from said aircraft.

49. The system defined in claim 48, further comprising a remote pilot transmitting device, whereby said remote pilot may communicate with said second logic device for control of said aircraft.

50. The system defined in claim 48, wherein each of said at least one autopilot and said at least one flight management computer is coupled to a respective one of said at least one second logic device.

51. The system defined in claim 48, wherein said second logic device is operative to receive signals from said at least one first logic device to override the control signals of said alternate pilot.

52. The system defined in claim 27, wherein said control station (a) is onboard one of said aircraft.

53. A system for supervising the movement of a plurality of aircraft in the vicinity of an airfield by a control device in a control station, each of said aircraft capable of being controlled by an onboard pilot, said system comprising, in combination:

(a) a control station comprising;

(1) a first transmitting/receiving (T/R) device for electronic communication with each of a plurality of aircraft; and

(2) at least one first logic device, coupled to said first T/R device, for analysis of received aircraft information and for the computation of traffic control instructions for orderly aircraft movement in the vicinity of said airfield; and

(b) aircraft control apparatus disposed on each of a plurality of aircraft, each said apparatus including;

(1) a second T/R device for electronic communication with said first T/R device of said control station;

(2) a display device coupled to said second T/R device, aboard each aircraft for displaying said traffic control instructions; and

(3) at least one telemetry device, coupled to the second T/R device, for providing aircraft information about said aircraft required for aircraft supervision in the vicinity of said airfield;

whereby (1) said aircraft information is transmitted from each of a plurality of aircraft in the vicinity of said airfield;

(2) aircraft information is received at said control station and processed by said at least one first logic device;

(3) said at least one first logic device generates traffic control instructions for each of said plurality of aircraft based on said information;

(4) said traffic control instructions are transmitted from said first T/R device to said respective second T/R devices on said aircraft; and

(5) said traffic control instructions are displayed on said aircraft;

thereby to allow for orderly motion of aircraft in the vicinity of an airfield without a human air traffic controller.

54. The system defined in claim 53, wherein said traffic control instructions supervise at least one of:

(i) aircraft landing; and

(ii) aircraft takeoff.

55. The system defined in claim 54, wherein at least one of said first logic device generates landing sequence instructions indicating the landing sequence for aircraft needing to land at said airfield at the time of said landing sequence generation.

56. The system defined in claim 53, wherein said first logic device generates traffic control instructions indicating at least one of:

(i) landing instructions including at least one of;

(α

) the approach vector for an aircraft approaching said airfield;

(β

) the choice of runway for an aircraft which is going to land at said airfield;

(γ

) instructions describing an air path to be taken by an aircraft in the vicinity of said airfield, in order to delay a landing; and

(δ

) the time that an aircraft should land;

(ii) motion instructions for aircraft on the ground at said airfield; and

(iii) takeoff instructions including at least one of;

(α

) the takeoff runway from which an aircraft should take off;

(β

) the taxiways that an aircraft should traverse to reach said takeoff runway;

(γ

) any time and place where a temporary halt in aircraft motion is necessary; and

(δ

) the time that an aircraft should take off.

57. The system defined in claim 56, wherein said air path is defined by at least one of:

the altitude, the radius and the spatial coordinates of the center of a circular orbit;

the altitude, the ellipticity, and the spatial coordinates of each of the foci of an elliptical orbit; and

the coordinates of each of a sufficiently large number of points along said air path to define said air path.

58. The system defined in claim 54, wherein said traffic control instructions include a landing inhibit instruction, instructing said onboard pilot to postpone the landing of said aircraft.

59. The system defined in claim 58, where said landing inhibit instruction instructs said onboard pilot to move said aircraft into a pre-defined orbit in the vicinity of the airfield.

60. The system defined in claim 58, where said landing inhibit instruction instructs said onboard pilot to move said aircraft into one of a plurality of pre-defined orbits in the vicinity of the airfield, said orbit selected by said control device.

61. The system defined in claim 60, wherein said first logic device may send traffic control instructions, instructing said onboard pilot to change the aircraft motion from one pre-defined orbit to another.

62. The system defined in claim 54, wherein said first logic device may send an instruction, instructing said aircraft to approach the airfield along one of a plurality of pre-defined approach vectors.

63. The system defined in claim 54, wherein said traffic control instructions is a landing confirmation instruction, instructing said onboard pilot to initiate the landing of said aircraft.

64. The system defined in claim 53, wherein said aircraft control apparatus further comprises at least one second logic device, coupled to said second T/R device, for controlling said aircraft by controlling at least one of the movable aerodynamic control surfaces of the aircraft, throttles, landing gear, and brakes;

whereby said second logic device automatically carries out said air traffic instructions;

thereby to allow said first logic device to control the motion of said aircraft in the vicinity of said airfield.

65. The system defined in claim 64, wherein said aircraft control apparatus further comprises an instruction enabling input device, coupled to said second logic device, to allow said second logic device to enact said air traffic instructions transmitted from said first logic device;

thereby to allow said onboard pilot to enable control of said aircraft by said first logic device, in the vicinity of said airfield.

66. The system defined in claim 64, wherein said aircraft control apparatus further comprises an override input device, coupled to said second logic device, to allow said onboard pilot to input an override command, thereby to allow said onboard pilot to override the air traffic instructions transmitted from said first logic device.

67. The system defined in claim 66, wherein said override input device is further coupled to said second T/R device, thereby to transmit said override input information to said first logic device.

68. The system defined in claim 64, wherein said traffic control instructions control at least one of:

(i) aircraft landing; and

(ii) aircraft takeoff.

69. The system defined in claim 68, wherein said first logic device generates landing sequence instructions, for transmission to said second logic devices;

thereby controlling the landing sequence for aircraft needing to land at said airfield at the time of said landing sequence generation.

70. The system defined in claim 64, wherein said first logic device generates traffic control instructions indicating at least one of:

(i) landing instructions including at least one of;

(α

) the approach vector for an aircraft approaching said airfield;

(β

) the choice of runway for an aircraft which is going to land at said airfield;

(γ

) instructions describing an air path to be taken by an aircraft in the vicinity of said airfield, in order to delay a landing; and

(δ

) the time that an aircraft should land;

(ii) motion instructions for aircraft on the ground at said airfield; and

(iii) takeoff instructions including at least one of;

(α

) the takeoff runway from which an aircraft should take off;

(β

) the taxiways that an aircraft should traverse to reach said takeoff runway;

(γ

) any time and place where a temporary halt in aircraft motion is necessary; and

(δ

) the time that an aircraft should take off.

71. The system defined in claim 70, wherein said air path is defined by at least one of:

the altitude, the radius and the spatial coordinates of the center of a circular orbit;

the altitude, the ellipticity, and the spatial coordinates of each of the foci of an elliptical orbit; and

the coordinates of each of a sufficiently large number of points along said air path to define said air path.

72. The system defined in claim 64, wherein said traffic control instructions is a landing inhibit instruction, causing said second logic device to postpone the landing of said aircraft.

73. The system defined in claim 72, where said landing inhibit instruction causes said second logic device to move said aircraft into a pre-defined orbit in the vicinity of the airfield.

74. The system defined in claim 72, where said landing inhibit instruction causes said second logic device to move said aircraft into one of a plurality of pre-defined orbits in the vicinity of the airfield, said orbit selected by said first logic device.

75. The system defined in claim 74, wherein said first logic device may send traffic control instructions, causing said second logic device to change the aircraft motion from one pre-defined orbit to another.

76. The system defined in claim 64, wherein said first logic device may send an instruction, causing said second logic device to cause said aircraft to approach the airfield along one of a plurality of pre-defined approach vectors.

77. The system defined in claim 64, wherein said traffic control instructions is a landing confirmation instruction, causing said second logic device to cause the landing of said aircraft.

78. The system defined in claim 53, wherein said telemetry device comprises at least one of:

(i) an aircraft identification generating device;

(ii) a fuel remaining sensor; and

(iii) a global positioning apparatus;

wherein said telemetry output is transmitted to said first logic device for at least one of;

aircraft identification, and the calculation of remaining fuel safety margin for said aircraft.

79. The system defined in claim 53, wherein said control station further comprises:

(3) a display device coupled to at least one of said first logic device for displaying said traffic control instructions; and

(4) a supervisory input device, coupled to at least one of said first logic device;

whereby a supervising person (1) observes said traffic control instructions generated by said at least one first logic device, and (2) may override the decision of said at least one first logic device by inputting overriding instructions to said supervisory input device.