METHOD FOR INCREASING PRODUCTIVITY AND SAFETY IN THE MINING AND HEAVY CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRIES

• US 20080208646A1
• Filed: 02/28/2007
• Published: 08/28/2008
• Est. Priority Date: 02/28/2007
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Bottrell Family Investments Limited Partnership
• Original Assignee: Bottrell Family Investments Limited Partnership
• Inventors: Thompson, Ralph E.
• Application Number:
  US11/679,989
• Publication Number:
  US 20080208646A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 705/7
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/06 Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/06375 Prediction of business process outcome or impact based on a proposed change
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/06398 Performance of employee with respect to a job function
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/10 Office automation; Time management

Abstract

A method for increasing productivity and safety in the mining and heavy construction industries comprising: evaluating equipment operator skills; correlating the evaluated operator skills to skill levels; calculating an average site skill level; correlating the average site skill level to an incident rate; establishing equipment costs based on the incident rate; projecting equipment costs for different average site skill levels; comparing actual to projected equipment costs; using the average site skill level to generate a productivity factor for each class of equipment; calculating production costs for a class of equipment based on the productivity factors; calculating production costs for different productivity factors; comparing actual to projected production costs to generate cost-benefit information for a manager deciding whether to implement a training program; and generating a report with recommended training based on the skill evaluations and desired equipment cost and/or productivity factor goals.

Claims

1. A method for increasing productivity and safety in the mining and heavy construction industries comprising:

(a) evaluating equipment operator skills at a site;

(b) correlating the evaluated operator skills to operator skill levels;

(c) calculating an average site skill level for the site;

(d) correlating the average site skill level to an incident rate;

(e) establishing equipment costs for the site based on the incident rate from step (d);

(f) calculating incident rates for different average site skill levels;

(g) projecting equipment costs for different average site skill levels based on the incident rates calculated in step (f);

(h) comparing the equipment costs from step (e) to the projected equipment costs from step (g);

(i) wherein the site utilizes one or more classes of equipment, using the average site skill level to generate a productivity factor for each class of equipment;

(j) calculating production costs for a class of equipment based on the productivity factors generated in step (i);

(k) calculating production costs for different productivity factors;

(l) comparing the production costs from step (j) to the production costs from step (k) to generate cost-benefit information for a manager deciding whether to implement a training program; and

(m) generating a report with recommended training based on the skill evaluations and desired equipment cost and/or productivity factor goals established by the site manager based on the information generated in steps (h) and (l).

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the average site skill level is for a particular class of equipment.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein the method applies to an operation, and wherein the average site skill level is for the operation as a whole.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein the step of calculating incident rates for different average site skill levels is performed using the following algorithm:

IR=Σ

C*200,000/Σ

t_EE(c₁+c₂+c₃ . . . )200,000/Σ

t_EE

wherein IR is the incident rate, C represents the cases of reportable incidents for the site, t_EE represents the total time in hours of employee exposure at the site, and c_α

represents the cases of reportable incidents for each individual operator at a particular skill level over the period of his or her employment at the site.

5. The method of claim 1, wherein the step of projecting equipment costs for different average site skill levels involves three categories of incidents,

wherein the three categories of incidents are major, serious and minor;

wherein each category of incident has an assigned dollar value;

wherein the equipment costs for the major incident category are calculated by multiplying the incident rate by the dollar value assigned to that category;

wherein the equipment costs for the serious incident category are calculated by multiplying the incident rate by ten and then by the dollar value assigned to that category; and

wherein the equipment costs for the minor incident category are calculated by multiplying the incident rate by thirty and then by the dollar value assigned to that category.

6. The method of claim 1, wherein the step of using the average site skill level to generate a productivity factor for each class of equipment is performed using the following algorithm:

PF=O_Ap*E

wherein PF is the productivity factor, O_Ap represents the operator percentage of efficiency for a particular skill level, and E represents the efficiency for a specified operation based on original equipment manufacturer (OEM) specifications.

7. The method of claim 1, wherein the step of calculating production costs for a class of equipment is performed using the following algorithm:

PC=PF*Σ

Eq*Σ

Ot*Σ

HCO

wherein PC is the production cost, PF represents the productivity factor for a given class of equipment, Eq represents the number of pieces of equipment in the class, Ot represents the hours of operation for each piece of equipment in the class, and HCO represents the hourly cost of operation for each piece of equipment.

8. The method of claim 7, wherein the hourly cost of operation comprises purchase, finance, depreciation, repair and maintenance, consumables and/or labor costs associated with the equipment.

9. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

(n) assessing an operator'"'"'s knowledge in one or more areas and assigning a knowledge assessment score to the operator;

(o) storing the knowledge assessment score for the operator in a database;

(p) providing computer-based instruction designed to improve the operator'"'"'s knowledge assessment score;

(q) repeating steps (n) through (p) until the operator'"'"'s knowledge assessment score is acceptable.