Method and System For Determining Freshness and Palatability and Assessing Organ Vitality

• US 20080224716A1
• Filed: 02/28/2007
• Published: 09/18/2008
• Est. Priority Date: 03/18/2006
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: John D. Kutzko, Michaeal G. Singer
• Original Assignee: John D. Kutzko, Michaeal G. Singer
• Inventors: Singer, Michaeal G., Kutzko, John D.
• Application Number:
  US11/912,887
• Publication Number:
  US 20080224716A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 324/629
• CPC Class Codes: A61B 2017/00969 used for transplantation
• CPC Class Codes: A61B 5/053 Measuring electrical impedance or conductance of a portion of the body
• CPC Class Codes: A61B 5/0531 Measuring skin impedance
• CPC Class Codes: A61B 5/0537 Measuring body composition by impedance, e.g. tissue hydration or fat content
• CPC Class Codes: A61B 5/413 Monitoring transplanted tissue or organ, e.g. for possible rejection reactions after a transplant
• CPC Class Codes: A61B 5/416 the spleen
• CPC Class Codes: A61B 5/4869 Determining body composition
• CPC Class Codes: A61B 5/6824 Arm or wrist
• CPC Class Codes: A61B 5/6825 Hand
• CPC Class Codes: A61B 5/6829 Foot or ankle
• CPC Class Codes: G01N 33/02 Food

Abstract

A method and system to determine freshness and palatability (tenderness, juiciness, and flavor) of live foodstuffs (meat, fish, fowl, fruit and vegetables) including the steps of; utilizing bioelectrical impedance analysis in a biological subject model for measurement and composition analysis; and a system of using the results of the utilizing step procedure to illustrate an objective scale of palatability; a ‘Palatability Index’. Also a method of whole body and regional organ and tissue vitality assessment in a biological entity, human, animal, fruit or vegetable, including the steps of: utilizing bioelectric impedance analysis in a biological model for composition analysis; and using the results of the utilizing step to provide an objective assessment of volume and distribution of fluid and tissues, and electrical health of cells and membranes of the organ or tissue.

Claims

1. A method of determining and monitoring palatability and freshness of a foodstuff biological entity including at least a portion of a live or previously-live organism, comprising the steps of:

subjecting said foodstuff biological entity to bioelectrical impedance analysis for measurement and composition analysis; and

utilizing results of said subjecting step to illustrate an objective scale of palatability and freshness of said foodstuff biological entity.

2. A method according to claim 1, wherein:

said bioelectrical impedance analysis includes measurement and/or calculation of resistance, reactance, impedance, capacitance, and/or phase angle of said foodstuff biological entity.

3. A method according to claim 1, wherein:

said utilizing step also determines a value of an “

Electrical Freshness”

, “

Palatability Index”

or “

EFRESH”

certification for said foodstuff biological entity.

4. A method according to claim 2, including:

placing said foodstuff biological entity or a portion thereof in an electrical field; and

taking said measurements through a fixed or scanning process.

5. A method according to claim 1, wherein:

said bioelectrical impedance analysis includes measurement and/or calculation of resistance, reactance, impedance, capacitance, and/or phase angle of said foodstuff biological entity as determined through measurement by mono or multiple frequencies or spectroscopic analysis and by series and/or parallel circuit models; and

using voltage and current sufficient to accommodate the geometry of said foodstuff biological entity.

6. A method according to claim 1, wherein:

said method is utilized to determine optimal aging, curing, and/or processing of said entity; and

said subjecting step includes subjecting said entity to bioelectrical impedance analysis for measurement, composition analysis, and serial tracking and grading of aging or preservation of said entity and determination of aging or preservation (intentional or incidental) beyond palatability.

7. A method according to claim 3, wherein:

said method is utilized to determine optimal aging, curing, and/or processing of said entity; and

said subjecting step includes subjecting said entity to bioelectrical impedance analysis for measurement, composition analysis, and serial tracking and grading of aging or preservation of said entity and determination of aging or preservation (intentional or incidental) beyond palatability.

8. A method according to claim 6, including:

placing said foodstuff biological entity or a portion thereof in an electrical field; and

taking said measurements through a fixed or scanning process.

9. A method according to claim 6, wherein:

said bioelectrical impedance analysis includes measurement and/or calculation of resistance, reactance, impedance, capacitance, and/or phase angle of said foodstuff biological entity; and

including the step of comparing said measurements and calculations to normal values, average values, optimal values, and/or individual values, and in response to time and/or external influences purposeful or incidental.

10. A method according to claim 7, wherein:

said bioelectrical impedance analysis includes measurement and/or calculation of resistance, reactance, impedance, capacitance, and/or phase angle of said foodstuff biological entity; and

including the step of comparing said measurements and calculations to normal values, average values, optimal values, and/or individual values, and in response to time and/or external influences purposeful or incidental.

11. A method according to claim 7, including:

placing said foodstuff biological entity or a portion thereof in an electrical field; and

taking said measurements through a fixed or scanning process.

12. A method according to claim 6, wherein:

said bioelectrical impedance analysis includes measurement and/or calculation of resistance, reactance, impedance, capacitance, and/or phase angle of said entity as determined through measurement by mono or multiple frequencies or spectroscopic analysis; and

including the step of comparing said measurements and calculations to normal values, average values, optimal values, and/or individual values, and in response to time and/or external influences purposeful or incidental.

13. A method for determining palatability and freshness of a foodstuff biological entity, changes of palatability of said biological entity, and/or timing of optimal palatability, loss of the palatability of said biological entity and/or illustrating an objective scale of palatability from which a producer, purveyor, merchant, preparer or consumer may objectively and subjectively apply individual tastes and select from said scale their preference, comprising the steps of:

providing normal, average, optimal and individual measured values of resistance, reactance, capacitance and phase angle, of a sample subject studied of said foodstuff biological entity;

measuring initial values of impedance, resistance, reactance, capacitance and phase angle of said sample subject foodstuff biological entity;

taking measurements of impedance, resistance, reactance, capacitance and phase angle, at predetermined intervals of time based upon said sample subject foodstuff biological entity;

recording said measurements;

comparing initial values of said measurements to normal values of said measurements and to serially measured values of said measurements; and

determining, from said comparison steps, hallmarks of palatability of said foodstuff biological entity, said progression of changes in palatability and freshness of said biological entity, to a specific individual Palatability Index or Electrical Freshness value which may be reported and found as the inherent average, normal, optimal and/or safe individual characteristics of said foodstuff biological entity or portion thereof.

14. A method according to claim 13, including:

measuring initial values of impedance, resistance, reactance, capacitance and phase angle of said sample subject biological entity as determined by mono or multiple frequencies or spectroscopic analysis and/or at various current, voltage and power, and by series and/or parallel circuit models requirements as to accommodate the inherent characteristics of the subject foodstuff biological entity.

15. A method according to claim 13, including:

placing said foodstuff biological entity or a portion thereof in an electrical field; and

taking said measurements through a fixed or scanning process.

16. A method according to claim 13, including the steps of

determining a first value of a “

Palatability/Freshness Index”

from said measured initial values of impedance, resistance, reactance, capacitance and phase angle of said sample subject foodstuff biological entity;

determining a second value of said “

Palatability/Freshness Index”

from said measurements at said predetermined intervals of time; and

determining third values of said “

Palatability/Freshness Index”

based upon said comparison steps.

17-20. -20. (canceled)

21. A method of organ and tissue vitality assessment in a biological entity, human, animal, fruit or vegetable, comprising the steps of:

utilizing bioelectric impedance analysis in a biological model for composition analysis; and

using the results of said utilizing step to provide an objective assessment of volume and distribution of fluid and tissues, as well as electrical health of cells and membranes of said organ or tissue of any biological entity.

22. The method according to claim 21, including the step of:

utilizing a modified bioelectric impedance analysis for composition analysis to assess the health of cells of said organs and tissues or the biological entity by the measured reactance thereof.

23. A method according to claim 21, wherein upon harvesting, processing, preserving, treating or transporting said organ or tissue or meat, fish, fruit or vegetable from the donor or source, including the steps of:

placing signal introduction electrodes on opposite lateral peripheral borders of said organ tissue, meat, fish, fruit or vegetable;

placing signal detection electrodes at superior and inferior borders of said organ tissue, meat, fish, fruit or vegetable for a first part of an initial measurement;

measuring and recording first values of resistance and reactance and calculating the phase angle of said organ tissue, meat, fish, fruit or vegetable in said initial measurement;

then placing said signal introduction electrodes on said superior and said inferior borders of said organ tissue, meat, fish, fruit or vegetable;

placing said signal detection electrodes on said opposite lateral borders of said organ tissue, meat, fish, fruit or vegetable;

measuring and recording second values of said resistance and said reactance and calculating the phase angle of said organ tissue, meat, fish, fruit or vegetable; and

comparing said first and second values to normal values to assess vitality.

24. A method according to claim 22, wherein upon arrival of said organ tissue, meat, fish, fruit or vegetable at the location of the recipient including the steps of:

placing signal introduction electrodes on opposite lateral peripheral borders of said organ, tissue, meat, fish, fruit or vegetable;

placing signal detection electrodes at superior and inferior borders of said organ, tissue, meat, fish, fruit or vegetable for a first part of an initial measurement of said organ, tissue, meat, fish, fruit or vegetable;

measuring and recording first values of resistance and reactance and calculating the phase angle of said organ, tissue, meat, fish, fruit or vegetable in said initial measurement;

then placing said signal introduction electrodes on said superior and said inferior borders of said organ, tissue, meat, fish, fruit or vegetable;

placing said signal detection electrodes on said opposite lateral borders of said organ, tissue, meat, fish, fruit or vegetable;

measuring and recording second values of said resistance and said reactance and calculating the phase angle of said organ, tissue, meat, fish, fruit or vegetable; and

comparing said first and second values to normal values to assess vitality of said organ, tissue, meat, fish, fruit or vegetable.

25. A method according to claim 23, wherein prior to preservation, sale, implantation, treatment and/or consumption of said organ tissue, meat, fish, fruit or vegetable into the recipient including the following additional steps:

again placing said signal introduction electrodes on said opposite lateral peripheral borders of said organ tissue, meat, fish, fruit or vegetable;

again placing said signal detection electrodes at said superior and said inferior borders of said organ tissue, meat, fish, fruit or vegetable;

measuring and recording third values of resistance and reactance and calculating the phase angle of said organ tissue, meat, fish, fruit or vegetable;

then again placing said signal introduction electrodes on said superior and said inferior borders of said organ tissue, meat, fish, fruit or vegetable;

again placing said signal detection electrodes on said opposite lateral borders of said organ tissue, meat, fish, fruit or vegetable;

measuring and recording fourth values of said resistance and said reactance of said organ tissue, meat, fish, fruit or vegetable; and

comparing said first and second values to said third and fourth values to determine if the values are within a predetermined acceptable range of agreement denoting no further loss of said organ tissue, meat, fish, fruit or vegetable vitality.

26. A method according to claim 24, including the following additional steps:

again placing said signal introduction electrodes on said opposite lateral peripheral borders of said organ tissue, meat, fish, fruit or vegetable;

again placing said signal detection electrodes at said superior and said inferior borders of said organ tissue, meat, fish, fruit or vegetable;

measuring and recording third values of resistance and reactance and calculating the phase angle of said organ tissue, meat, fish, fruit or vegetable;

then again placing said signal introduction electrodes on said superior and said inferior borders of said organ tissue, meat, fish, fruit or vegetable;

again placing said signal detection electrodes on said opposite lateral borders of said organ tissue, meat, fish, fruit or vegetable;

measuring and recording fourth values of said resistance and said reactance and calculating the phase angle of said organ tissue, meat, fish, fruit or vegetable; and

comparing said first and second values to said third and fourth values to determine if the values are within a predetermined acceptable range of agreement denoting no further loss of said organ tissue, meat, fish, fruit or vegetable vitality.

33. A method according to claim 23, wherein:

said measured values of resistance and reactance and the calculation of phase angle changes will be compared to their previous values and considered in the rate of change either increase or decrease the assessment of fluid volumes, cellular architecture, freshness and vitality.

34. A method according to claim 23, including the steps of:

comparing and assessing homogeneity within heterogeneous populations based upon comparative values of calculated phase angles.

35. A method according to claim 23, wherein:

the severity, criticality or burden of an adverse condition is based upon said calculated phase angle value in that a higher value indicates a less severe, critical or burden of adversity and a lower value indicates a greater severity, criticality or burden of adversity.

36. A method according to claim 35 wherein:

the resources allocated or required to manage said adverse condition are based upon said calculated phase angle value in that the lower phase angle value entity requires greater resources than that of an entity with a greater phase angle value.

37. A method according to claim 36, wherein:

in those entities that experience a transient reduction of said phase angle value that does not fully return to the previous baseline phase angle value after apparent recovery that that entity is not fully recovered and may be predisposed to further adversity and require additional care and intervention.

39. A method according to claim 23, wherein:

the freshness of a consumable biological foodstuff such as a meat, fish, fowl, fruit or vegetable is based upon said calculated phase angle value in which the higher said phase angle value as related to that value upon initial harvest or processing is compared to that level after transport or upon purchase or process for purchase.

40. A method according to claim 39, wherein:

said phase angle is used as a freshness indicator of said consumable biological foodstuff.

27. A method of organ, tissue, meat, fish, fruit or vegetable vitality assessment, comprising the steps of:

placing signal introduction electrodes on opposite lateral peripheral borders of said organ, tissue, meat, fish, fruit or vegetable;

placing signal detection electrodes at superior and inferior borders of said organ, tissue, meat, fish, fruit or vegetable for a first part of an initial measurement of said organ tissue, meat, fish, fruit or vegetable;

measuring and recording first values of resistance and reactance of said organ, tissue, meat, fish, fruit or vegetable in said initial measurement;

then placing said signal introduction electrodes on said superior and said inferior borders of said organ tissue, meat, fish, fruit or vegetable;

placing said signal detection electrodes on said opposite lateral borders of said organ, tissue, meat, fish, fruit or vegetable;

measuring and recording second values of said resistance and said reactance of said organ, tissue, meat, fish, fruit or vegetable; and

comparing said first and second values to normal values to assess vitality of said organ, tissue, meat, fish, fruit or vegetable.

28. A method according to claim 27, including the following additional steps:

again placing said signal introduction electrodes on said opposite lateral peripheral borders of said organ, tissue, meat, fish, fruit or vegetable;

again placing said signal detection electrodes at said superior and said inferior borders of said organ, tissue, meat, fish, fruit or vegetable;

measuring and recording third values of resistance and reactance and calculating the phase angle of said organ, tissue, meat, fish, fruit or vegetable;

then again placing said signal introduction electrodes on said superior and said inferior borders of said organ, tissue, meat, fish, fruit or vegetable;

again placing said signal detection electrodes on said opposite lateral borders of said organ, tissue, meat, fish, fruit or vegetable;

measuring and recording fourth values of said resistance and said reactance and calculating the phase angle of said organ, tissue, meat, fish, fruit or vegetable; and

comparing said first and second values to said third and fourth values to determine if the values are within a predetermined acceptable range of agreement denoting no further loss of said organ, tissue, meat, fish, fruit or vegetable vitality.

29. A method of organ, tissue, meat, fish, fruit or vegetable vitality assessment for transplantation, treatment, consumption, preservation, sale or transport of an organ, tissue, meat, fish, fruit or vegetable being assessed, comprising the steps of:

placing signal introduction electrodes on opposite lateral peripheral borders of said organ, tissue, meat, fish, fruit or vegetable upon harvesting of said organ tissue, meat, fish, fruit or vegetable;

placing signal detection electrodes at superior and inferior borders of said organ tissue, meat, fish, fruit or vegetable for a first part of an initial measurement upon said harvesting of said organ, tissue, meat, fish, fruit or vegetable;

measuring and recording first values of resistance and reactance of said organ, tissue, meat, fish, fruit or vegetable in said initial measurement;

then placing said signal introduction electrodes on said superior and said inferior borders of said organ, tissue, meat, fish, fruit or vegetable;

placing said signal detection electrodes on said opposite lateral borders of said organ, tissue, meat, fish, fruit or vegetable;

measuring and recording second values of said resistance and said reactance of said organ, tissue, meat, fish, fruit or vegetable; and

comparing said first and second values to normal values to determine if said organ, tissue, meat, fish, fruit or vegetable is acceptable or not for said transplantation, consumption, treatment or transportation effects.

30. A method according to claim 29, wherein:

if said organ, tissue, meat, fish, fruit or vegetable is acceptable, then prior to preserving, selling, implanting, consuming or further treatment said organ, tissue, meat, fish, fruit or vegetable, performing the following steps;

again placing said signal introduction electrodes on said opposite lateral peripheral borders of said organ, tissue, meat, fish, fruit or vegetable;

again placing said signal detection electrodes at said superior and said inferior borders of said organ, tissue, meat, fish, fruit or vegetable for a first part of an initial post-harvest (transport/treatment)/pre-implant, consumption, preservation, sale, treatment or transport measurement;

measuring and recording third values of resistance and reactance of said organ, tissue, meat, fish, fruit or vegetable in said initial post-harvest (transport, treatment)/pre-implant measurement;

then placing said signal introduction electrodes on said superior and said inferior borders of said organ, tissue, meat, fish, fruit or vegetable;

placing said signal detection electrodes on said opposite lateral borders of said organ, tissue, meat, fish, fruit or vegetable;

measuring and recording fourth values of said resistance and said reactance of said organ, tissue, meat, fish, fruit or vegetable; and

comparing said first and second values to said third and fourth values to determine if the values are within a predetermined acceptable range of agreement denoting no further loss of said organ, tissue, meat, fish, fruit or vegetable vitality.

31. A method according to claim 29, including:

harvesting said organ from a first species of biological entity; and

implanting said organ in a different species of biological entity.

32. A method according to claim 30, including:

harvesting said organ from a first species of biological entity; and

implanting said organ in a different species of biological entity.

38. A method according to claim 30, wherein:

the vitality of said organ will have different levels of vitality based upon its measured resistance, reactance and calculated phase angle which while it may not be optimal will be sufficient for its purpose and may further be used to classify its use for a corresponding recipient with the matching of a higher phase angle value to the recipient with a lower phase angle value, and conversely the matching of a organ with a lower phase angle value to a recipient of a higher phase angle value.