METHOD OF FITTING CONTACT LENSES

• US 20080231810A1
• Filed: 03/18/2008
• Published: 09/25/2008
• Est. Priority Date: 03/19/2007
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Johnson & Johnson Vision Care Incorporated (Johnson & Johnson)
• Original Assignee: Johnson & Johnson Vision Care Incorporated (Johnson & Johnson)
• Inventors: Menezes, Edgar V., Catania, Louis J.
• Granted Patent: US 7,731,365 B2
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 351/247
• CPC Class Codes: A61B 3/028 for testing visual acuity; for determination of refraction, e.g. phoropters
• CPC Class Codes: A61B 3/103 for determining refraction, e.g. refractometers, skiascopes
• CPC Class Codes: A61B 3/107 for determining the shape or measuring the curvature of the cornea

Abstract

The invention provides a method of fitting lenses that results in correction of not only low and high order ocular aberrations, but that additionally provides correction for the effects of cortical influences, or neuro-adaptive influences.

Claims

1. A contact lens fitting method, comprising the steps of:

a.) obtaining baseline measurements of low order aberration data;

low order manifest subjective data;

high order spherical aberrations resulting from the crystalline lens;

corneal data; and

visual requirements or an individual;

b.) determining a difference between the lower order aberrations and the lower order manifest subjective refraction obtained in carrying out the baseline measurements in step a.);

c.) fitting at least a first trial aspheric lens on an eye of the individual, wherein the first trial lens is selected based on the low order aberrations and the crystalline lens spherical aberrations less a corneal Q_v;

d.) carrying out a contrast sensitivity function measurement of the first trial lens;

e.) obtaining a second contrast sensitivity function measurement that takes into account the difference between the low order aberration data and the low order manifest subjective data;

f.) calculating the difference between the first and second contrast sensitivity function measurements; and

g.) selecting an aspheric lens for the individual based on the following equation;

(low order manifest subjective refraction+crystalline lens spherical aberrations)−

Q_v+CSA

wherein CSA is a cortical spherical aberration.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein step e.) further comprises carrying out a second contrast sensitivity function measurement while the first trial lens is on-eye and the individual is viewing through a phoropter or a trial frame into which the difference between the low order aberration data and low order manifest subjective refraction data is inputted.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein step e.) further comprises (i) fitting a second trial aspheric lens on the eye of the individual, wherein the second trial lens is selected based on the low order manifest subjective data and the crystalline lens spherical aberrations less a corneal Q_v and (ii) carrying out a second contrast sensitivity function measurement using the second trial lens.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein step a.) further comprises obtaining measurements of a slit lamp evaluation of the cornea, an individual visual acuity history, a tear film volume, chemistry and quality analysis;

a pinhole acuity; and

a near point analysis.

5. The method of claim 1, further comprising the step of repeating steps a) through g.) at chronological intervals during the individual'"'"'s lifetime.

6. The method of claim 2, further comprising the step of repeating steps a) through g.) at chronological intervals during the individual'"'"'s lifetime.

7. The method of claim 3, further comprising the step of repeating steps a) through g.) at chronological intervals during the individual'"'"'s lifetime.