SYSTEMS AND METHODS FACILITATING AUXILIARY ANALYSIS OF DATA FROM IMPLANTED MEDICAL DEVICES

• US 20080270036A1
• Filed: 04/27/2007
• Published: 10/30/2008
• Est. Priority Date: 04/27/2007
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Medtronic Incorporated (Medtronic Plc)
• Original Assignee: Medtronic Incorporated (Medtronic Plc)
• Inventors: Patel, Amisha S., Webb, James D.
• Application Number:
  US11/741,031
• Publication Number:
  US 20080270036A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 702/19
• CPC Class Codes: A61N 1/37282 characterised by communication with experts in remote locations using a network
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/10 Office automation; Time management
• CPC Class Codes: G16H 15/00 ICT specially adapted for medical reports, e.g. generation or transmission thereof
• CPC Class Codes: G16H 40/67 for remote operation
• CPC Class Codes: G16H 50/20 for computer-aided diagnosis, e.g. based on medical expert systems

Abstract

Systems and methods facilitating auxiliary analysis of data collected by an implanted medical device employ a software application user interface, through which an analysis service may be invoked for a selected group of data sets collected from an implanted device; the group of data sets includes data sets that describe episodes detected and classified by an analysis performed by the device, and/or data sets that describe events indicative of a device integrity issue. The user interface informs, or notifies a user of the system if any of the results warrant further review of the corresponding data sets, and may display an organized report of results from the automated analysis. The report may be organized such that those results, which warrant further review, are displayed in a more prominent fashion than other results.

Claims

1. A system facilitating auxiliary analysis of data collected by an implanted medical device, the system comprising:

a data handling system for storing a collection of data, the collection of data including data sets collected by the implanted device;

an analysis service including a pre-programmed algorithm adapted to analyze the data sets; and

a software application adapted to project a user interface, adapted for invoking the algorithm of the analysis service to analyze a selected group of the data sets, and adapted to organize results of the analysis for each of the selected group of data sets, wherein the user interface of the application provides a notification to a user of the system if any of the organized results warrant further review of the corresponding selected data sets.

2. The system of claim 1, wherein a portion of the selected group of data sets describes an episode detected and classified by an analysis performed by the device, and the results warranting further review, that are associated with each episode-describing data set, differ in classification from a classification generated by the device analysis of the corresponding selected data set.

3. The system of claim 2, wherein the described episode detected is a type of cardiac arrhythmia.

4. The system of claim 1, wherein a portion of the results warranting further review are indicative of a device integrity issue.

5. The system of claim 1, wherein the algorithm is adapted to analyze each selected data set for an indication of one of over-sensing, under-sensing, abnormal impedance, supra-ventricular tachyarrhythmia, atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter, atrial/sinus tachyarrhythmia and monomorphic ventricular tachyarrhythmia.

6. The system of claim 1, wherein an invocation, through the software application, of the analysis service is provided by a user interacting with the application user interface.

7. The system of claim 1, wherein an invocation, through the software application, of the analysis service is pre-programmed into the application to be automatic at periodic intervals.

8. The system of claim 1, wherein the user interface further provides a report of the results.

9. The system of claim 8, wherein a portion of the results warranting further review are indicative of a device integrity issue, and the report of the results includes a warning related to the device integrity issue.

10. The system of claim 8, wherein the report of the results is organized such that each result warranting further review is displayed in a more prominent fashion than other results.

11. The system of claim 8, wherein the report of the results is organized such that each result warranting further review is displayed bolder than results other than the report of the results.

12. The system of claim 8, wherein the report of the results is organized such that each result warranting further review is displayed in a color different from a color in which results other than the report of results are displayed.

13. The system of claim 8, wherein the report of the results is organized such that each result warranting further review is located closer to a top of the display than results other than the report of results.

14. The system of claim 8, wherein the report further includes a description of evidence supporting each result warranting further review.

15. The system of claim 8, wherein the report further includes a time associated with the data set associated with each result warranting further review.

16. The system of claim 8, wherein the report further includes a heart rate associated with the data set associated with each result warranting further review.

17. The system of claim 1, wherein the user interface is further adapted to display a graphical representation of the data set associated with each result warranting further review.

18. The system of claim 5, wherein the user interface is further adapted to display a graphical representation of the data set associated with each result warranting further review, and each graphical representation includes one or more annotation corresponding to one or more of the indications, if one or more of the indications is found for the corresponding data set by the algorithm.

19. The system of claim 2, wherein the difference in classification between the analysis service analysis and the device analysis is determined by the software application.

20. The system of claim 2, wherein the difference in classification between the analysis service analysis and the device analysis is determined by the analysis service algorithm.

21. The system of claim 1, wherein the software application is further adapted to provide the results in an XML format.

22. The system of claim 1, wherein the selected group of data sets are selected by a user interacting with the user interface.

23. The system of claim 1, wherein the selected group of data sets are selected automatically according to pre-programmed criteria.

24. The system of claim 1, wherein the analysis service is a web service.

25. The system of claim 1, wherein the notification is formatted into one of a plurality of browser screens, a PDF report, an XPS report, an e-mail message, a page, a fax, and an RSS feed.

26. A method facilitating auxiliary analysis of data collected by an implanted medical device, the method comprising:

selecting a group of data sets from a collection of data stored in a data handling system, the data sets having been collected from an implanted device;

invoking an analysis service to retrieve and analyze the selected data sets; and

receiving notification from a software application linked to the analysis service, the notification informing whether results of the analysis service analysis warrant further review of the corresponding selected data sets.

27. The method of claim 26, wherein selecting the group of data sets and invoking the analysis service are automatic, occurring at pre-programmed intervals according to pre-programmed criteria.

28. The method of claim 26, wherein selecting the group of data sets and invoking the analysis service are performed via a user interface of the software application linked to the analysis service.

29. The method of claim 26, wherein a portion of the selected data sets describes an episode detected and classified by an analysis performed by the implanted device;

and

the results warranting further review, that are associated with each episode-describing data set, differ in classification from a classification generated by the device analysis of the corresponding data set.

30. The method of claim 29, further comprising:

selecting a configuration for a graphical representation of the episode described by the data set associated with each result warranting further review; and

viewing at least one of the graphical representations.

31. The method of claim 26, wherein a portion of the results warranting further review are indicative of a device integrity issue.

32. The method of claim 26, wherein the analysis service is a web service.

33. The method of claim 26, further comprising displaying a report generated by the software application, the report including a summary of each automated analysis result warranting further review.

34. The method of claim 33, further comprising:

selecting a more detailed report generated by the software application, the more detailed report including a description of each result warranting further review and a description of evidence supporting each result warranting further review; and

displaying the more detailed report.