Methods and Apparatus for Reasoning About Information Fusion Approaches

• US 20080288425A1
• Filed: 05/17/2007
• Published: 11/20/2008
• Est. Priority Date: 05/17/2007
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Battelle Memorial Institute
• Original Assignee: Battelle Memorial Institute
• Inventors: Posse, Christian, Tratz, Stephen C., White, Amanda M., Beagley, Nathaniel, Spindola, Jorge F. Reyes
• Application Number:
  US11/749,916
• Publication Number:
  US 20080288425A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 706/12
• CPC Class Codes: G06N 5/02 Knowledge representation; Symbolic representation

Abstract

Methods and apparatus for reasoning about information fusion approaches are described according to some aspects. In one aspect, a method for reasoning about information fusion approaches comprises selecting one or more information fusion approaches for evaluation, and applying the approaches to two or more sets of data. The selection of information fusion approaches can be based on a taxonomy that classifies information fusion algorithms. The impact of each of the applied information fusion approaches can then be conveyed to a user, wherein the conveyed impact is based on one or more impact measures.

Claims

1. A computer-implemented method of reasoning about information fusion approaches, the method comprising:

selecting one or more information fusion approaches for evaluation, wherein said selecting is based on a taxonomy that classifies information fusion algorithms;

applying one or more of the selected information fusion approaches to two or more sets of data, and

conveying to a user the impact of each of the applied information fusion approaches, wherein the conveyed impact is based on one or more impact measures.

2. The computer-implemented method as recited in claim 1, wherein at least a portion of the data comprises information selected from the group consisting of sensor data, text-based correspondence, communication transcripts, news articles, intelligence reports, imagery, and maps.

3. The computer-implemented method as recited in claim 1, wherein at least a portion of the data comprises computer-processable information characterized by one or more information analysis techniques.

4. The computer-implemented method as recited in claim 3, wherein at least a portion of the data comprises data signatures.

5. The computer-implemented method as recited in claim 3, wherein the information analysis techniques comprise visual analytics techniques.

6. The computer-implemented method as recited in claim 1, wherein said selecting is automated, user-assisted, user-determined, or combinations thereof.

7. The computer-implemented method as recited in claim 1, wherein said selecting is further based on the pedigrees of the data.

8. The computer-implemented method as recited in claim 1, wherein the taxonomy comprises one or more fusion processes, wherein fusion processes are classes of fusion algorithms.

9. The computer-implemented method as recited in claim 8, wherein the taxonomy comprises one or more fusion algorithms, wherein fusion algorithms are classes of fusion implementation variants.

10. The computer-implemented method as recited in claim 8, wherein the taxonomy further comprises symmetric and asymmetric data classes, wherein the symmetric and asymmetric classes are different classes of fusion processes.

11. The computer-implemented method as recited in claim 10, wherein fusion processes associated with the symmetric data class comprise data fusion, feature fusion, and decision fusion processes.

12. The computer-implemented method as recited in claim 10, wherein fusion processes associated with the asymmetric dataset class comprise data enrichment and analytics enrichment processes.

13. The computer-implemented method as recited in claim 1, wherein said applying comprises traversing the taxonomy along a path of associated classes to a fusion implementation variant of a particular fusion algorithm, and applying to the data the fusion implementation variant of the particular fusion algorithm.

14. The computer-implemented method as recited in claim 1, wherein said applying comprises varying the degree of enrichment when employing asymmetric fusion or varying the degree of mixing when employing symmetric fusion.

15. The computer-implemented method as recited in claim 14, wherein said varying the degree of enrichment or the degree of mixing comprises applying a parameter to one or more analytical operators or to at least one of the sets of data.

16. The computer-implemented method as recited in claim 14, wherein an optimal enrichment produces the maximum impact, based on one or more impact measures, at the minimum degree of enrichment.

17. The computer-implemented method as recited in claim 1, wherein said conveying comprises conveying substantially in parallel the impact of a plurality of information fusion approaches.

18. The computer-implemented method as recited in claim 1, wherein said conveying occurs substantially in real-time relative to said applying.

19. The computer-implemented method as recited in claim 1, wherein the impact measures comprise numeric criteria, visual criteria, or both.

20. The computer-implemented method as recited in claim 1, wherein said conveying comprises generating visual representations of the impact.

21. The computer-implemented method as recited in claim 20, wherein the visual representations are dynamic or static.

22. The computer-implemented method as recited in claim 1, further comprising fusing the sets of data using one of the information fusion approaches.

23. The computer-implemented method as recited in claim 22, wherein the fusing results in the optimal impact based on the impact measures.

24. An apparatus for reasoning about information fusion approaches comprising:

a plurality of information fusion algorithms accessible by processing circuitry, wherein the information fusion algorithms are classified according to a taxonomy;

two or more sets of data accessible by processing circuitry; and

processing circuitry configured to;

select one or more information fusion approaches for evaluation, wherein the selection is based on the taxonomy of information fusion algorithms;

apply one or more of the selected information fusion approaches to at least two of the sets of data;

convey to a user through a user interface the impact of the application of the fusion approaches, wherein the conveyed impact is based on one or more impact measures; and

process input received from a user through an input device.

25. The apparatus as recited in claim 24, wherein at least a portion of the data comprises computer-processable information characterized by one or more information analysis techniques.

26. The apparatus as recited in claim 24, wherein the conveyance of the impact comprises generation of a visualization that is displayed to the user on a display device.