METHOD, SYSTEM, SIGNAL AND PROGRAM PRODUCT FOR ASSURING FEEDBACK IS RECEIVED FROM STUDENTS OF AN ONLINE COURSE

• US 20080299532A1
• Filed: 06/04/2007
• Published: 12/04/2008
• Est. Priority Date: 06/04/2007
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Ceu Plan Incorporated
• Original Assignee: Ceu Plan Incorporated
• Inventors: Edgar, William W.
• Application Number:
  US11/757,561
• Publication Number:
  US 20080299532A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 434/350
• CPC Class Codes: G09B 7/00 Electrically-operated teaching apparatus or devices working with questions and answers mechanically operated G09B3/00; computing arrangements G06F

Abstract

An application for a system that assures feedback is provided from a student to a professor of an on-line course. The system includes a computer with at least a processor, memory and storage and software running on the computer for accepting inputs indicating the student feedback. Once the student feedback is entered by the student, the software running on the computer determines if the student feedback is valid, and if it is valid, the student feedback is provided to the professor and a final grade is provided to the student. If it is not valid, no final grade is provided.

Claims

1. A system for assuring feedback is provided from a student to a professor of an on-line course, the system comprising:

a computer including at least a processor, memory and storage;

software running on the computer for accepting inputs indicating the feedback from the student;

software running on the computer for determining if the feedback is valid;

software running on the computer for providing the feedback to the professor only if the feedback is valid; and

software running on the computer for providing a final grade from the professor to the student.

2. The system for assuring feedback is provided from a student to a professor of an on-line course of claim 1, wherein the software running on the computer for determining if the feedback is valid includes software that counts a number of words in the feedback and if the number of words is greater than a word-count-threshold, the software that counts the number of words in the feedback indicates that the feedback is valid.

3. The system for assuring feedback is provided from a student to a professor of an on-line course of claim 1, wherein the software running on the computer for determining if the feedback is valid include software that determines an average length of words in the feedback and if the average length of words is within an acceptable range, the software that determines the average length of words in the feedback indicates the feedback is valid.

4. The system for assuring feedback is provided from a student to a professor of an on-line course of claim 1, wherein the software running on the computer for determining if the feedback is valid includes software that performs a spelling check on the feedback and if the spelling check detects an acceptable number of spelling errors, the software that performs the spelling check on the feedback indicates the feedback is valid.

5. The system for assuring feedback is provided from a student to a professor of an on-line course of claim 1, wherein the software running on the computer for providing the feedback to the professor does not provide access to the feedback to the professor until a final grade is presented to the student at which time access is provided to the feedback for the professor.

6. A method for assuring feedback is provided from a student to a professor of an on-line course, the method comprising:

accepting inputs containing the feedback from the student;

determining if the feedback is valid; and

if the feedback is valid, providing a final grade to the student.

7. The method of claim 6, wherein the step of determining if the feedback is valid includes counting a number of words in the feedback and if the number of words is greater than a word-count-threshold, indicating the feedback is valid.

8. The method of claim 6, wherein the step of determining if the feedback is valid includes determining an average length of words in the feedback and if the average length of words is within an acceptable range, indicating the feedback is valid.

9. The method of claim 6, wherein the step of determining if the feedback is valid includes performing a spelling check on the feedback and if the spelling check detects an acceptable number of spelling errors, indicating the feedback is valid.

10. The method of claim 6, wherein the step of providing the feedback to the professor further includes a step of determining if the professor has provided a final grade and after the professor has provided the final grade, providing access to the feedback for the professor.

11. A computer readable medium tangibly embodying a program of instructions, the program of instructions configured to assure feedback is provided from a student to a professor of an on-line course, the program of instructions comprising:

computer instructions for accepting inputs containing the feedback from the student;

computer instructions for determining if the feedback is valid; and

if the feedback is valid, computer instructions providing a final grade from the professor to the student.

12. The computer readable medium tangibly embodying a program of instructions, the program of instructions configured to assure feedback is provided from a student to a professor of an on-line course of claim 11, wherein the step of determining if the feedback is valid includes performing a spelling check on the feedback and if the spelling check detects an acceptable number of spelling errors, indicating the feedback is valid

13. The computer readable medium tangibly embodying a program of instructions, the program of instructions configured to assure feedback is provided from a student to a professor of an on-line course of claim 11, wherein the step of determining if the feedback is valid includes counting a number of words in the feedback and if the number of words is greater than a word-count-threshold, indicating the feedback is valid.

14. The computer readable medium tangibly embodying a program of instructions, the program of instructions configured to assure feedback is provided from a student to a professor of an on-line course of claim 11, wherein the step of determining if the feedback is valid is includes determining an average length of words in the feedback and if the average length of words is within an acceptable range, indicating the feedback is valid.

15. The computer readable medium tangibly embodying a program of instructions, the program of instructions configured to assure feedback is provided from a student to a professor of an on-line course of claim 11, wherein the step of providing the feedback to the professor further includes a step of determining if the professor has provided a final grade once the professor has provided the final grade, providing access to the feedback for the professor.