Systems and methods for policy enforcement in electronic evidence management

• US 20080301757A1
• Filed: 05/31/2007
• Published: 12/04/2008
• Est. Priority Date: 05/31/2007
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Xiotech Corporation
• Original Assignee: Xiotech Corporation
• Inventors: Demarest, Marc, Lolayekar, Santosh, Kondoff, Robert, Winkler, Scott
• Application Number:
  US11/809,550
• Publication Number:
  US 20080301757A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 726/1
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/10 Office automation; Time management

Abstract

Systems and methods are provided for policy enforcement on electronic evidence captured from at least one source. The contents of the captured electronic evidence are indexed, and the captured electronic evidence is classified based on the indexed contents by associating the electronic evidence with one or more classes. It is determined whether one or more policies apply to the classified captured electronic evidence. When two or more policies apply to the classified captured electronic evidence, a conflict between the two or more policies is resolved to select the one or more policies to enforce. The systems and methods also enforce the selected one or more policies on the classified captured evidence.

Claims

1. A method for policy enforcement on electronic evidence captured from at least one source, the method comprising:

indexing the contents of the captured electronic evidence;

classifying the captured electronic evidence based on the indexed contents by associating the electronic evidence with one or more classes;

determining whether one or more policies apply to the classified captured electronic evidence;

when two or more policies apply to the classified captured electronic evidence, resolving a conflict between the two or more policies to select the one or more policies to enforce; and

enforcing the selected one or more policies on the classified captured evidence.

2. The method of claim 1, further comprising determining whether one or more policies has been violated, based on the indexed contents of the captured electronic evidence.

3. The method of claim 2, further comprising performing an action based on the one or more policy violations.

4. The method of claim 3, wherein the performing an action comprises monitoring the at least one source of the captured electronic evidence, restricting access to the at least one source, or investigating the policy violation, or any combination thereof.

5. A system for policy enforcement on electronic evidence captured from at least one source, comprising:

means for indexing the contents of the captured electronic evidence;

means for classifying the captured electronic evidence based on the indexed contents by associating the electronic evidence with one or more classes;

means for determining whether one or more policies apply to the classified captured electronic evidence;

when two or more policies apply to the classified captured electronic evidence, means for resolving a conflict between the two or more policies to select the one or more policies to enforce; and

means for enforcing the selected one or more policies on the classified captured evidence.

6. The system of claim 5, further comprising means for determining whether one or more policies has been violated, based on the indexed contents of the captured electronic evidence.

7. The system of claim 6, further comprising means for performing an action based on the one or more policy violations.

8. The system of claim 7, wherein the means for performing an action comprises means for monitoring the at least one source of the captured electronic evidence, means for restricting access to the at least one source, or means for investigating the policy violation, or any combination thereof.

9. A computer readable medium comprising software that, when executed by a computer, causes an electronic evidence management system to perform a method for policy enforcement on electronic evidence captured from at least one source, the method comprising:

indexing the contents of the captured electronic evidence;

classifying the captured electronic evidence based on the indexed contents by associating the electronic evidence with one or more classes;

determining whether one or more policies apply to the classified captured electronic evidence;

when two or more policies apply to the classified captured electronic evidence, resolving a conflict between the two or more policies to select the one or more policies to enforce; and

enforcing the selected one or more policies on the classified captured evidence.

10. The medium of claim 9, further comprising determining whether one or more policies has been violated, based on the indexed contents of the captured electronic evidence.

11. The medium of claim 10, further comprising performing an action based on the one or more policy violations.

12. The medium of claim 11, wherein the performing an action comprises monitoring the source of the captured electronic evidence, restricting access to the at least one source, or investigating the policy violation, or any combination thereof.